Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Montana by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Montana 6,10 34.5 (32.4, 36.6) 222 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.2, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 26.5 (16.0, 43.0) 4 stable stable trend -8.6 (-48.9, 63.5)
Ravalli County 6,10 28.4 (20.3, 39.1) 9 stable stable trend -12.8 (-42.8, 32.9)
Missoula County 6,10 30.9 (24.7, 38.2) 18 stable stable trend 5.4 (-14.0, 29.3)
Silver Bow County 6,10 31.0 (21.6, 43.6) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-43.3, 69.0)
Yellowstone County 6,10 31.4 (26.5, 36.9) 31 stable stable trend -13.8 (-26.1, 0.6)
Gallatin County 6,10 31.4 (24.2, 40.2) 13 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.2, 11.2)
Flathead County 6,10 31.5 (25.3, 38.8) 19 stable stable trend 3.8 (-18.8, 32.6)
Lewis and Clark County 6,10 40.0 (31.3, 50.4) 16 stable stable trend -11.1 (-23.7, 3.6)
Fergus County 6,10 40.2 (23.8, 66.2) 4 stable stable trend -9.7 (-42.9, 43.0)
Lake County 6,10 40.2 (28.7, 55.4) 8 stable stable trend -11.3 (-40.1, 31.3)
Cascade County 6,10 40.4 (33.0, 49.0) 22 stable stable trend -5.6 (-28.2, 24.1)
Hill County 6,10 41.9 (25.3, 65.8) 4 stable stable trend -18.7 (-48.5, 28.3)
Dawson County 6,10 52.5 (30.4, 86.7) 3
*
*
Custer County 6,10 53.3 (31.7, 84.8) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-59.2, 144.8)
Beaverhead County 6,10 54.4 (30.2, 92.0) 3
*
*
Big Horn County 6,10 58.2 (34.0, 92.8) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 2.0)
Rosebud County 6,10 61.4 (34.2, 102.2) 3
*
*
Roosevelt County 6,10 68.0 (41.6, 105.6) 4 stable stable trend -4.5 (-49.2, 79.4)
Blaine County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Broadwater County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carbon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chouteau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deer Lodge County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fallon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glacier County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granite County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Judith Basin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meagher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Musselshell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Park County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pondera County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanders County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stillwater County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sweet Grass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Toole County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2016 1:27 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top