Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 131.0 (127.9, 134.2) N/A 1,479 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 4.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) N/A 249,750 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Butler County 6 121.8 (81.4, 176.8) 38 (2, 62) 7 stable stable trend -20.9 (-45.5, 4.8)
Keith County 6 76.5 (49.3, 117.1) 62 (26, 62) 6 falling falling trend -20.1 (-49.6, -4.9)
Dixon County 6 97.6 (56.3, 159.6) 54 (4, 62) 4 stable stable trend -4.6 (-10.8, 1.0)
Polk County 6 124.5 (74.1, 198.2) 33 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.4, 0.6)
Antelope County 6 93.8 (53.2, 154.5) 58 (3, 62) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.8, -0.2)
Custer County 6 110.1 (77.1, 153.4) 49 (5, 62) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.2, 1.0)
Holt County 6 122.9 (87.4, 169.5) 37 (3, 62) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.8, 1.2)
Nuckolls County 6 112.9 (64.9, 189.1) 48 (2, 62) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.8, 3.1)
Merrick County 6 89.0 (55.2, 137.4) 59 (12, 62) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.5)
Fillmore County 6 133.9 (83.6, 205.8) 23 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.3)
Cherry County 6 94.0 (52.9, 156.1) 57 (5, 62) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.2, 2.6)
Stanton County 6 87.1 (49.5, 144.3) 60 (9, 62) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.4, 3.6)
Dawes County 6 98.2 (64.4, 145.9) 53 (7, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.7, 3.9)
Morrill County 6 95.8 (52.7, 163.7) 56 (4, 62) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.1, 4.7)
Box Butte County 6 113.8 (77.7, 161.2) 47 (3, 62) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.4)
Wayne County 6 83.6 (51.8, 128.9) 61 (19, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.3, 3.5)
Cheyenne County 6 102.7 (69.0, 148.1) 51 (5, 62) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.4, 3.8)
Hall County 6 119.2 (102.9, 137.3) 41 (14, 55) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Lancaster County 6 119.5 (112.0, 127.4) 40 (22, 49) 201 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
York County 6 140.9 (104.9, 185.4) 19 (1, 58) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.6)
Gage County 6 106.7 (84.8, 133.4) 50 (15, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Dodge County 6 155.6 (131.5, 182.9) 7 (1, 38) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Madison County 6 118.4 (97.9, 142.2) 44 (11, 57) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.5)
Adams County 6 137.1 (113.7, 164.1) 22 (4, 50) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.4)
Buffalo County 6 115.2 (96.8, 136.1) 45 (15, 58) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Colfax County 6 114.2 (75.2, 165.8) 46 (3, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.2, 6.0)
Sarpy County 6 141.0 (130.4, 152.3) 18 (7, 35) 135 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.9)
Saunders County 6 127.8 (101.1, 159.8) 27 (4, 56) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 4.0)
Phelps County 6 147.3 (105.8, 201.0) 13 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.6, 7.4)
Richardson County 6 140.5 (98.9, 196.2) 20 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 5.1)
Seward County 6 119.0 (89.6, 155.3) 43 (5, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-18.3, 18.6)
Howard County 6 123.1 (77.1, 187.9) 35 (2, 62) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.2, 5.5)
Douglas County 6 144.5 (138.4, 150.8) 15 (7, 28) 446 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Kearney County 6 101.8 (62.8, 158.1) 52 (3, 62) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.0)
Platte County 6 144.9 (120.8, 172.4) 14 (2, 47) 29 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.1)
Dakota County 6 96.5 (71.5, 127.6) 55 (17, 62) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.6)
Boone County 6 129.8 (78.6, 204.1) 24 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.2, 8.1)
Hamilton County 6 126.1 (87.7, 176.7) 30 (2, 61) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.4, 7.7)
Otoe County 6 126.9 (95.1, 166.1) 28 (3, 59) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 5.9)
Sheridan County 6 152.0 (96.0, 231.3) 8 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.6, 8.8)
Cass County 6 124.7 (100.7, 152.9) 32 (6, 57) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.3)
Cedar County 6 125.0 (85.2, 178.4) 31 (2, 61) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 7.0)
Washington County 6 148.5 (119.7, 182.7) 11 (2, 48) 20 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 5.4)
Burt County 6 129.0 (86.5, 188.4) 25 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.0)
Knox County 6 140.3 (94.5, 201.2) 21 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.5)
Valley County 6 162.7 (106.1, 244.5) 4 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.1, 9.9)
Dawson County 6 119.1 (93.5, 149.6) 42 (7, 59) 16 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.2, 17.9)
Thurston County 6 156.9 (103.7, 227.7) 6 (1, 60) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 8.0)
Furnas County 6 151.3 (93.7, 234.1) 9 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.3, 10.4)
Cuming County 6 141.0 (95.4, 201.0) 17 (1, 61) 7 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.7, 22.0)
Clay County 6 176.6 (122.0, 249.3) 3 (1, 55) 8 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.2, 10.1)
Jefferson County 6 147.9 (102.5, 208.8) 12 (1, 59) 8 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.6, 22.0)
Thayer County 6 162.4 (95.9, 256.8) 5 (1, 62) 5 rising rising trend 9.1 (0.2, 41.1)
Scotts Bluff County 6 128.4 (107.3, 152.5) 26 (7, 54) 31 rising rising trend 14.3 (9.7, 23.0)
Saline County 6 149.0 (112.1, 194.3) 10 (1, 54) 12 rising rising trend 16.5 (0.5, 33.3)
Lincoln County 6 124.1 (103.8, 147.5) 34 (7, 55) 30 stable stable trend 17.2 (-4.0, 37.8)
Johnson County 6 182.8 (108.3, 289.2) 2 (1, 60) 5 rising rising trend 18.2 (3.1, 54.5)
Red Willow County 6 142.3 (102.6, 192.9) 16 (1, 58) 10 rising rising trend 30.0 (1.7, 53.5)
Franklin County 6 123.0 (68.3, 215.7) 36 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Hitchcock County 6 204.6 (114.7, 341.2) 1 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Nemaha County 6 120.1 (79.8, 175.9) 39 (2, 62) 6
*
*
Pierce County 6 126.3 (82.3, 186.6) 29 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Arthur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top