Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 *** 116.9 (114.0, 119.9) N/A 1,266 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.9, 8.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Greeley County 6 *** 215.7 (129.6, 347.8) 1 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 35.7 (-5.3, 94.6)
Boone County 6 *** 176.6 (124.5, 247.6) 2 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.9, 7.5)
Cheyenne County 6 *** 172.1 (128.6, 226.5) 3 (1, 40) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 4.9)
Cuming County 6 *** 165.8 (124.6, 218.3) 4 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.7)
Burt County 6 *** 163.8 (118.4, 224.8) 5 (1, 52) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.2)
Sherman County 6 *** 161.8 (96.8, 263.5) 6 (1, 64) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.1, 4.1)
Dixon County 6 *** 157.4 (107.1, 225.9) 7 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.4, 9.7)
Wayne County 6 *** 153.7 (108.9, 211.7) 8 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.2)
Holt County 6 *** 151.6 (114.9, 198.1) 9 (1, 51) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.1)
Chase County 6 *** 148.4 (91.0, 233.3) 10 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.8, 3.8)
Madison County 6 *** 146.5 (123.3, 173.1) 11 (2, 39) 30 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Pawnee County 6 *** 146.4 (88.3, 243.9) 12 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Keith County 6 *** 145.1 (106.4, 196.2) 13 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.4)
Sheridan County 6 *** 138.0 (94.3, 200.8) 14 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.3)
Dodge County 6 *** 136.9 (116.6, 159.9) 15 (4, 43) 33 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.9, -2.8)
Polk County 6 *** 136.8 (89.8, 204.2) 16 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.6, 5.7)
Box Butte County 6 *** 134.8 (99.5, 179.8) 17 (1, 59) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.6)
Washington County 6 *** 133.2 (106.5, 165.2) 18 (3, 54) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Saunders County 6 *** 130.8 (105.7, 160.8) 19 (4, 54) 20 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.6, 0.2)
Johnson County 6 *** 129.8 (82.3, 197.1) 20 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Platte County 6 *** 128.9 (107.4, 153.7) 21 (6, 52) 26 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.9)
Nuckolls County 6 *** 128.3 (80.7, 200.8) 22 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.7, 7.1)
Harlan County 6 *** 126.7 (79.1, 203.6) 23 (1, 65) 4 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.4, -2.1)
Scotts Bluff County 6 *** 126.2 (106.2, 149.1) 24 (7, 52) 29 stable stable trend 16.5 (-1.2, 37.2)
Pierce County 6 *** 124.0 (83.2, 180.0) 25 (2, 65) 6 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.5, 0.1)
Howard County 6 *** 123.1 (82.5, 179.6) 26 (2, 65) 6 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.9, -0.7)
Cass County 6 *** 121.5 (98.3, 149.0) 27 (7, 58) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.8)
Douglas County 6 *** 120.0 (113.9, 126.3) 28 (18, 41) 317 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.1, 7.3)
Webster County 6 *** 118.1 (68.4, 198.1) 29 (1, 65) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.9, 4.3)
Saline County 6 *** 117.4 (85.9, 157.0) 30 (4, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.6, 4.9)
Lancaster County 6 *** 115.9 (108.2, 123.9) 31 (20, 47) 182 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Fillmore County 6 *** 115.1 (75.1, 173.6) 32 (2, 65) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.4)
Lincoln County 6 *** 114.9 (95.9, 136.9) 33 (12, 58) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Merrick County 6 *** 112.1 (75.8, 161.9) 34 (4, 65) 6 falling falling trend -25.2 (-40.0, -6.8)
Gage County 6 *** 112.0 (90.1, 138.5) 35 (9, 61) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.8)
Nemaha County 6 *** 111.9 (71.9, 168.1) 36 (3, 65) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.2, 5.2)
Morrill County 6 *** 111.7 (68.8, 176.2) 37 (2, 65) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.4, 2.6)
Butler County 6 *** 111.4 (76.3, 159.5) 38 (3, 65) 7 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.0, 0.4)
Hall County 6 *** 110.8 (95.4, 128.0) 39 (16, 58) 39 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.9, -2.6)
Knox County 6 *** 110.7 (77.9, 155.6) 40 (4, 65) 8 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.8, 0.4)
Buffalo County 6 *** 110.4 (92.3, 131.0) 41 (14, 59) 28 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -0.8)
Otoe County 6 *** 109.1 (82.7, 142.1) 42 (8, 64) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Thurston County 6 *** 106.0 (58.9, 174.6) 43 (2, 65) 3
*
*
Thayer County 6 *** 105.1 (65.9, 164.8) 44 (3, 65) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.8, 5.2)
Kearney County 6 *** 104.1 (65.5, 159.4) 45 (4, 65) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.8, 4.5)
Custer County 6 *** 104.0 (75.3, 141.9) 46 (9, 65) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.8, -1.2)
Jefferson County 6 *** 103.7 (66.3, 156.7) 47 (4, 65) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.9, 3.2)
Richardson County 6 *** 103.0 (70.6, 148.3) 48 (7, 65) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.8, -0.2)
Adams County 6 *** 102.9 (83.1, 126.2) 49 (16, 63) 20 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.7, -2.8)
Sarpy County 6 *** 102.0 (92.2, 112.6) 50 (29, 58) 85 stable stable trend 6.8 (-2.5, 17.0)
Antelope County 6 *** 100.5 (65.8, 151.2) 51 (6, 65) 5 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.2, 1.1)
Dakota County 6 *** 100.0 (74.7, 131.3) 52 (12, 65) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Cedar County 6 *** 97.8 (67.4, 140.0) 53 (8, 65) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.4, -0.4)
York County 6 *** 96.8 (70.9, 130.4) 54 (14, 65) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.3, 2.4)
Stanton County 6 *** 96.5 (57.3, 154.5) 55 (6, 65) 4 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.3, 0.8)
Cherry County 6 *** 95.2 (57.0, 152.3) 56 (5, 65) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.6, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6 *** 95.1 (64.2, 137.6) 57 (9, 65) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.8, 0.6)
Clay County 6 *** 92.6 (56.7, 145.6) 58 (7, 65) 4 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.1, -1.6)
Seward County 6 *** 92.4 (68.1, 123.1) 59 (18, 65) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.8)
Furnas County 6 *** 84.7 (49.9, 141.4) 60 (10, 65) 4 stable stable trend -4.3 (-10.6, 2.4)
Colfax County 6 *** 80.8 (51.2, 121.5) 61 (19, 65) 5 falling falling trend -8.0 (-11.4, -4.5)
Phelps County 6 *** 80.1 (51.7, 120.3) 62 (19, 65) 5 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.5, -2.5)
Red Willow County 6 *** 80.0 (53.7, 116.2) 63 (21, 65) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.6)
Dawson County 6 *** 79.1 (59.0, 104.1) 64 (34, 65) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.3)
Dawes County 6 *** 76.5 (46.9, 120.0) 65 (19, 65) 4 stable stable trend -5.2 (-10.7, 0.7)
Arthur County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2021 9:27 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top