Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 N/A 233.8 (230.6, 237.1) N/A 4,421 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adams County 6 Rural 235.7 (210.7, 263.0) 38 (12, 67) 73 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Antelope County 6 Rural 288.0 (224.8, 363.7) 8 (1, 68) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.6)
Boone County 6 Rural 258.9 (196.8, 335.2) 18 (2, 76) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.1)
Box Butte County 6 Rural 239.8 (196.8, 289.6) 35 (5, 75) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.4)
Boyd County 6 Rural 254.4 (146.9, 412.7) 20 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.3, 3.2)
Brown County 6 Rural 183.6 (113.1, 282.8) 74 (4, 80) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 3.6)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 229.8 (209.4, 251.7) 42 (15, 66) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Burt County 6 Rural 294.1 (235.0, 364.3) 7 (1, 62) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.5)
Butler County 6 Rural 194.8 (154.1, 243.8) 70 (16, 80) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.6)
Cass County 6 Urban 269.6 (242.1, 299.7) 11 (4, 46) 80 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.9)
Cedar County 6 Rural 261.0 (210.3, 320.7) 16 (2, 71) 23 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 8.4)
Chase County 6 Rural 222.5 (154.7, 310.3) 52 (3, 80) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 4.7)
Cherry County 6 Rural 237.4 (180.6, 307.3) 36 (3, 78) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.2)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 176.1 (140.2, 219.0) 76 (31, 80) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.5)
Clay County 6 Rural 271.5 (211.7, 343.4) 10 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.3)
Colfax County 6 Rural 206.9 (167.0, 253.4) 63 (12, 79) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.3)
Cuming County 6 Rural 234.5 (187.3, 290.2) 39 (4, 76) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.5)
Custer County 6 Rural 268.3 (224.0, 319.3) 14 (2, 66) 30 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.5)
Dakota County 6 Urban 186.2 (159.4, 216.2) 72 (40, 79) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Dawes County 6 Rural 151.3 (113.6, 198.2) 80 (48, 80) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.1)
Dawson County 6 Rural 205.1 (178.6, 234.5) 64 (23, 77) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Deuel County 6 Rural 151.9 (84.2, 262.3) 79 (8, 80) 3
*
*
Dixon County 6 Rural 268.8 (207.6, 343.1) 13 (2, 74) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.0)
Dodge County 6 Rural 273.4 (248.7, 300.0) 9 (4, 41) 101 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Douglas County 6 Urban 243.2 (237.2, 249.2) 31 (19, 45) 1,346 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.4)
Dundy County 6 Rural 186.2 (105.3, 313.2) 73 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.1, 2.7)
Fillmore County 6 Rural 230.4 (175.1, 299.1) 41 (3, 79) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.2)
Franklin County 6 Rural 298.6 (209.8, 414.7) 6 (1, 78) 9 rising rising trend 12.5 (3.4, 35.7)
Frontier County 6 Rural 230.9 (156.7, 333.6) 40 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.2)
Furnas County 6 Rural 259.1 (193.9, 340.6) 17 (2, 77) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Gage County 6 Rural 223.3 (195.8, 254.0) 49 (13, 73) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Garden County 6 Rural 178.7 (98.4, 305.1) 75 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend -12.4 (-52.2, 2.3)
Garfield County 6 Rural 309.5 (195.0, 471.1) 5 (1, 80) 6 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 7.6)
Gosper County 6 Rural 211.5 (125.8, 338.6) 61 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.1)
Greeley County 6 Rural 387.6 (263.8, 549.7) 2 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.9, 5.9)
Hall County 6 Urban 223.9 (206.7, 242.2) 48 (23, 67) 135 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Hamilton County 6 Rural 264.3 (217.4, 318.7) 15 (2, 68) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.4)
Harlan County 6 Rural 226.7 (151.2, 328.9) 45 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 4.6)
Hitchcock County 6 Rural 331.5 (231.8, 462.0) 3 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.0, 6.1)
Holt County 6 Rural 222.2 (179.2, 272.7) 53 (6, 78) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 2.9)
Howard County 6 Urban 236.8 (185.5, 299.0) 37 (4, 78) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.7)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 243.3 (192.5, 304.4) 30 (3, 75) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Johnson County 6 Rural 223.1 (171.5, 287.2) 50 (5, 79) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Kearney County 6 Rural 215.6 (166.2, 275.7) 57 (5, 79) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 4.9)
Keith County 6 Rural 196.5 (152.8, 249.6) 69 (14, 80) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.1, 4.4)
Kimball County 6 Rural 170.2 (111.2, 252.0) 77 (8, 80) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.6, 1.3)
Knox County 6 Rural 246.1 (195.6, 306.1) 25 (3, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.0)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 214.6 (206.8, 222.6) 58 (41, 65) 614 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.9)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 222.9 (200.6, 247.1) 51 (19, 70) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Logan County 6 Rural 420.7 (227.2, 722.1) 1 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Madison County 6 Rural 247.0 (222.9, 273.1) 23 (8, 59) 87 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Merrick County 6 Urban 247.6 (197.5, 307.1) 21 (3, 75) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.3)
Morrill County 6 Rural 208.4 (148.4, 285.1) 62 (4, 80) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.2)
Nance County 6 Rural 257.0 (180.5, 356.2) 19 (1, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 5.9)
Nemaha County 6 Rural 224.0 (173.9, 284.5) 47 (4, 79) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 4.5)
Nuckolls County 6 Rural 204.3 (145.6, 281.5) 65 (5, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.1)
Otoe County 6 Rural 269.6 (233.6, 310.0) 12 (3, 56) 46 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9)
Pawnee County 6 Rural 213.9 (133.7, 327.2) 59 (2, 80) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.6, 9.3)
Perkins County 6 Rural 226.0 (148.9, 330.4) 46 (2, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.4, 5.2)
Phelps County 6 Rural 213.7 (170.9, 264.3) 60 (9, 78) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.6)
Pierce County 6 Rural 220.6 (172.8, 278.3) 55 (6, 78) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Platte County 6 Rural 228.6 (204.7, 254.6) 43 (15, 68) 74 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Polk County 6 Rural 247.4 (186.8, 322.5) 22 (2, 78) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.2)
Red Willow County 6 Rural 221.6 (181.7, 268.1) 54 (8, 76) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.3)
Richardson County 6 Rural 246.0 (198.4, 302.5) 26 (3, 75) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-13.0, 11.9)
Saline County 6 Rural 246.5 (210.3, 287.5) 24 (5, 69) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Sarpy County 6 Urban 241.8 (231.5, 252.4) 33 (17, 49) 431 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Saunders County 6 Urban 243.5 (214.1, 276.1) 29 (8, 67) 57 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.8)
Scotts Bluff County 6 Rural 228.5 (205.6, 253.4) 44 (16, 68) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Seward County 6 Urban 188.2 (158.6, 222.0) 71 (33, 79) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 198.0 (142.1, 269.4) 68 (5, 80) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.3, 6.6)
Sherman County 6 Rural 201.3 (131.9, 297.4) 66 (4, 80) 7 falling falling trend -22.0 (-44.2, -7.6)
Stanton County 6 Rural 165.8 (121.7, 221.8) 78 (24, 80) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.9, 0.6)
Thayer County 6 Rural 315.6 (242.1, 405.0) 4 (1, 66) 15 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.5)
Thurston County 6 Rural 240.0 (184.8, 306.2) 34 (3, 78) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.8)
Valley County 6 Rural 243.7 (176.5, 329.5) 27 (2, 79) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 5.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 243.6 (213.7, 276.8) 28 (7, 66) 54 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.0)
Wayne County 6 Rural 215.8 (171.2, 268.6) 56 (7, 79) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.7)
Webster County 6 Rural 200.2 (138.5, 282.9) 67 (4, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 2.8)
York County 6 Rural 242.4 (204.6, 285.4) 32 (5, 71) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.5)
Arthur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 7:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Grant, Hayes, Hooker, Keya Paha, Loup, McPherson, Rock, Sioux, Thomas, Wheeler

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top