Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 N/A 491.5 (485.5, 497.5) N/A 5,425 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Kimball County 6 Rural 279.5 (199.2, 388.9) 82 (61, 82) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.6, -0.3)
Morrill County 6 Rural 323.2 (242.0, 426.3) 81 (48, 82) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.6)
Dawes County 6 Rural 335.4 (266.7, 417.8) 80 (53, 82) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.2)
Stanton County 6 Rural 342.8 (262.4, 441.6) 79 (38, 82) 13 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.6)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 343.4 (265.3, 440.9) 78 (37, 82) 15 falling falling trend -10.1 (-25.9, -3.5)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 358.4 (295.8, 431.7) 77 (46, 82) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Pawnee County 6 Rural 359.9 (253.6, 507.2) 76 (13, 82) 8 falling falling trend -9.5 (-31.6, -1.5)
Seward County 6 Urban 386.1 (333.9, 444.5) 75 (44, 81) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Colfax County 6 Rural 387.1 (316.2, 469.0) 74 (23, 82) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Box Butte County 6 Rural 394.6 (328.1, 471.4) 73 (25, 82) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Dawson County 6 Rural 398.7 (352.8, 449.2) 72 (44, 80) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Gosper County 6 Rural 404.9 (263.5, 604.2) 71 (2, 82) 6 falling falling trend -5.7 (-13.6, -2.2)
Phelps County 6 Rural 407.3 (336.1, 490.2) 70 (19, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.2)
Dundy County 6 Rural 416.2 (275.1, 621.0) 69 (2, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Dakota County 6 Urban 417.4 (362.9, 477.8) 68 (28, 79) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Cherry County 6 Rural 418.6 (329.9, 525.9) 67 (8, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.2)
Wayne County 6 Rural 426.7 (350.8, 515.1) 66 (11, 81) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 1.0)
Chase County 6 Rural 436.7 (327.1, 574.1) 65 (4, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.5)
Frontier County 6 Rural 437.4 (319.9, 594.3) 64 (2, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.3)
Deuel County 6 Rural 437.8 (302.1, 630.9) 63 (2, 82) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.8, 15.6)
Red Willow County 6 Rural 441.7 (375.1, 517.7) 62 (11, 79) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Perkins County 6 Rural 453.0 (333.9, 606.8) 61 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.3)
Polk County 6 Rural 456.8 (364.1, 569.1) 60 (4, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Brown County 6 Rural 457.3 (338.8, 610.7) 59 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.0, 1.7)
Hall County 6 Urban 462.0 (429.9, 495.9) 58 (26, 68) 160 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Sherman County 6 Rural 462.2 (341.5, 618.5) 57 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.3, 2.5)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 462.8 (447.6, 478.5) 56 (36, 64) 742 falling falling trend -6.3 (-12.8, -1.3)
Furnas County 6 Rural 467.0 (369.2, 586.4) 55 (4, 80) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-8.2, -0.8)
Harlan County 6 Rural 467.2 (353.7, 613.2) 54 (2, 82) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 0.6)
Keith County 6 Rural 467.9 (397.9, 549.2) 53 (6, 76) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.3)
Saunders County 6 Urban 468.1 (418.1, 522.9) 52 (13, 71) 70 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Holt County 6 Rural 470.6 (398.8, 552.7) 51 (7, 76) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 0.9)
York County 6 Rural 471.8 (410.9, 539.8) 50 (8, 73) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Boyd County 6 Rural 472.2 (327.7, 676.8) 49 (1, 82) 9 falling falling trend -20.9 (-37.1, -3.1)
Knox County 6 Rural 472.6 (396.9, 560.2) 48 (5, 77) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Pierce County 6 Rural 478.1 (393.0, 577.6) 47 (3, 77) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.2)
Richardson County 6 Rural 479.6 (403.7, 567.8) 46 (5, 76) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 2.0)
Otoe County 6 Rural 481.0 (422.6, 545.9) 45 (8, 71) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.1)
Custer County 6 Rural 482.7 (412.8, 562.3) 44 (5, 73) 37 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Adams County 6 Rural 487.3 (442.8, 535.2) 43 (11, 67) 94 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Webster County 6 Rural 488.3 (374.5, 631.6) 42 (2, 80) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 2.9)
Kearney County 6 Rural 489.0 (401.4, 592.0) 41 (3, 77) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Scotts Bluff County 6 Rural 490.2 (448.6, 534.7) 40 (12, 64) 110 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.4, 12.4)
Rock County 6 Rural 493.4 (310.0, 765.6) 39 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 2.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 498.6 (444.1, 558.3) 38 (7, 67) 67 falling falling trend -7.4 (-11.2, -2.9)
Platte County 6 Rural 499.3 (456.1, 545.7) 37 (8, 64) 104 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Dodge County 6 Rural 500.6 (460.5, 543.5) 36 (10, 61) 120 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.7)
Sarpy County 6 Urban 501.1 (479.6, 523.4) 35 (16, 52) 439 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Garden County 6 Rural 501.4 (361.8, 694.2) 34 (1, 82) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 3.9)
Butler County 6 Rural 501.9 (422.3, 593.6) 33 (3, 74) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.2, 9.5)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 502.8 (464.1, 544.0) 32 (9, 60) 131 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Gage County 6 Rural 503.7 (453.5, 558.6) 31 (7, 65) 79 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Howard County 6 Urban 505.2 (417.5, 608.1) 30 (3, 75) 25 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -1.0)
Clay County 6 Rural 505.3 (407.5, 620.9) 29 (2, 77) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.5)
Dixon County 6 Rural 507.0 (405.0, 628.3) 28 (2, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.4)
Burt County 6 Rural 507.9 (421.7, 608.9) 27 (2, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Cuming County 6 Rural 508.8 (430.3, 598.6) 26 (3, 72) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Saline County 6 Rural 509.5 (442.6, 584.0) 25 (4, 68) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Madison County 6 Rural 511.0 (467.5, 557.6) 24 (6, 58) 109 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Johnson County 6 Rural 511.6 (413.3, 628.4) 23 (2, 77) 20 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.3)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 511.7 (427.9, 609.5) 22 (2, 74) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Thayer County 6 Rural 513.9 (411.2, 637.5) 21 (2, 76) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Fillmore County 6 Rural 519.6 (424.3, 633.0) 20 (2, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Nuckolls County 6 Rural 521.4 (414.8, 652.3) 19 (2, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.4)
Nance County 6 Rural 524.2 (384.2, 700.0) 18 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 4.6)
Cass County 6 Urban 525.8 (476.6, 579.0) 17 (5, 58) 92 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Thurston County 6 Rural 534.8 (416.9, 674.6) 16 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 1.9)
Douglas County 6 Urban 536.7 (524.2, 549.4) 15 (8, 31) 1,508 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.4, -0.3)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 540.4 (497.7, 586.0) 14 (4, 49) 127 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Franklin County 6 Rural 541.0 (399.8, 721.1) 13 (1, 80) 12 rising rising trend 7.3 (1.5, 24.7)
Nemaha County 6 Rural 541.5 (448.1, 650.1) 12 (1, 70) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.9)
Cedar County 6 Rural 546.1 (461.4, 643.0) 11 (2, 66) 33 stable stable trend 6.0 (-1.4, 23.0)
Merrick County 6 Urban 558.4 (468.3, 662.1) 10 (1, 65) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Hamilton County 6 Rural 563.4 (479.7, 658.4) 9 (1, 62) 35 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.3)
Hitchcock County 6 Rural 567.2 (428.3, 745.3) 8 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.3)
Antelope County 6 Rural 569.0 (470.5, 683.9) 7 (1, 68) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Valley County 6 Rural 575.0 (457.7, 717.2) 6 (1, 72) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.7)
Boone County 6 Rural 575.5 (476.5, 692.4) 5 (1, 64) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.2)
Wheeler County 6 Rural 592.6 (330.8, 1,011.0) 4 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural 647.4 (361.5, 1,090.7) 3 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Garfield County 6 Rural 664.3 (478.8, 909.7) 2 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.2)
Greeley County 6 Rural 743.6 (552.6, 984.7) 1 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.3)
Arthur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 11:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top