Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 52.3 (51.0, 53.7) N/A 1,236 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Douglas County 6 59.2 (56.4, 62.0) 14 (7, 25) 356 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Lancaster County 6 48.6 (45.2, 52.1) 33 (21, 47) 165 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Sarpy County 6 52.6 (47.8, 57.8) 23 (11, 44) 91 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.1)
Hall County 6 54.3 (46.9, 62.7) 19 (6, 47) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Dodge County 6 62.8 (53.3, 73.6) 9 (2, 36) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 55.0 (46.0, 65.4) 18 (4, 49) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.3)
Buffalo County 6 44.4 (36.8, 53.2) 48 (17, 58) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.9)
Cass County 6 66.7 (55.2, 80.2) 5 (1, 33) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Scotts Bluff County 6 47.0 (38.7, 56.8) 40 (12, 56) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 2.0)
Platte County 6 52.4 (43.2, 63.2) 24 (6, 53) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.6)
Adams County 6 50.8 (41.6, 61.7) 30 (6, 54) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.6)
Madison County 6 49.9 (40.8, 60.6) 31 (8, 55) 22 falling falling trend -12.8 (-22.4, -6.1)
Gage County 6 61.7 (50.0, 75.8) 10 (1, 46) 20 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.2)
Saunders County 6 59.3 (47.4, 73.5) 13 (2, 48) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1)
Dawson County 6 46.6 (36.1, 59.3) 42 (8, 59) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.4)
Washington County 6 48.3 (37.2, 61.9) 34 (6, 58) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.8)
Otoe County 6 54.3 (41.7, 69.9) 20 (2, 56) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Dakota County 6 57.9 (44.3, 74.4) 15 (1, 53) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Seward County 6 43.7 (32.4, 58.2) 49 (8, 60) 10 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.0, 0.3)
York County 6 47.9 (35.4, 64.2) 36 (4, 59) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.5)
Hamilton County 6 69.5 (50.4, 94.2) 3 (1, 49) 9 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.0, 7.3)
Richardson County 6 63.0 (45.8, 86.4) 8 (1, 53) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.8)
Red Willow County 6 53.8 (38.6, 73.9) 21 (2, 58) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.1)
Saline County 6 51.0 (36.7, 69.4) 28 (3, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.9, 5.4)
Keith County 6 51.8 (37.3, 72.3) 26 (2, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.8)
Jefferson County 6 63.6 (45.0, 89.2) 7 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.6)
Phelps County 6 53.7 (37.6, 75.4) 22 (2, 59) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 6.5)
Box Butte County 6 46.6 (31.6, 66.7) 41 (3, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.0)
Burt County 6 47.2 (31.9, 70.0) 39 (3, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 2.3)
Cedar County 6 45.4 (30.6, 66.3) 45 (3, 61) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.6)
Custer County 6 37.0 (24.6, 54.3) 55 (12, 61) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.0)
Nemaha County 6 59.8 (40.4, 86.8) 12 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.5, 10.0)
Cuming County 6 45.8 (30.3, 67.4) 44 (3, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.1)
Merrick County 6 46.3 (30.9, 68.1) 43 (3, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.5, 4.6)
Holt County 6 32.5 (21.5, 48.6) 59 (24, 61) 6 falling falling trend -5.7 (-15.1, -3.0)
Knox County 6 37.4 (23.9, 57.3) 54 (11, 61) 6 falling falling trend -9.1 (-25.3, -4.4)
Antelope County 6 48.0 (31.3, 72.7) 35 (2, 61) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.8, 5.6)
Butler County 6 43.4 (28.2, 65.3) 50 (4, 61) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.2, 8.3)
Dixon County 6 64.7 (41.0, 98.2) 6 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.5)
Franklin County 6 88.7 (57.0, 138.0) 1 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.3, 6.7)
Wayne County 6 44.7 (29.0, 66.8) 46 (3, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.2, 5.4)
Howard County 6 48.6 (31.4, 73.8) 32 (2, 61) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.7, -0.7)
Thurston County 6 73.0 (46.7, 108.6) 2 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.5)
Sheridan County 6 51.4 (32.4, 80.3) 27 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.6, 5.9)
Fillmore County 6 56.8 (34.0, 90.2) 16 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.2)
Cheyenne County 6 31.0 (19.1, 48.5) 61 (23, 61) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.7, 2.9)
Dawes County 6 34.9 (21.5, 55.0) 58 (13, 61) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.6)
Kearney County 6 42.6 (26.6, 66.5) 52 (4, 61) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.9, 4.6)
Polk County 6 52.1 (32.0, 82.6) 25 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.5, 6.6)
Nuckolls County 6 51.0 (31.4, 83.1) 29 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Boone County 6 42.2 (25.5, 68.9) 53 (3, 61) 4
*
*
Cherry County 6 43.2 (25.6, 70.1) 51 (3, 61) 4
*
*
Furnas County 6 56.0 (32.2, 92.1) 17 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 5.0 (-2.3, 14.3)
Colfax County 6 31.3 (18.6, 49.6) 60 (20, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.0, 3.5)
Pierce County 6 36.2 (21.6, 58.2) 57 (9, 61) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.3)
Johnson County 6 47.9 (28.2, 78.3) 37 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Nance County 6 67.5 (37.8, 113.6) 4 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.6, 8.9)
Webster County 6 61.4 (35.9, 102.1) 11 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.6, 4.2)
Valley County 6 44.6 (25.9, 75.9) 47 (2, 61) 3
*
*
Clay County 6 36.6 (19.9, 62.7) 56 (5, 61) 3 falling falling trend -10.9 (-36.2, -6.8)
Harlan County 6 47.4 (27.0, 84.1) 38 (1, 61) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.6)
Arthur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thayer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 8:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Boyd, Brown, Chase, Deuel, Dundy, Frontier, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Hayes, Hitchcock, Hooker, Keya Paha, Kimball, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Morrill, Pawnee, Perkins, Rock, Sherman, Sioux, Stanton, Thayer, Thomas, Wheeler

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top