Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 N/A 19.1 (18.3, 19.9) N/A 454 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.6, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Cass County 6 Urban 21.2 (14.9, 29.7) 13 (2, 24) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.6)
Dakota County 6 Urban 19.1 (11.4, 29.8) 18 (2, 24) 4
*
*
Douglas County 6 Urban 19.5 (18.0, 21.2) 16 (9, 22) 118 falling falling trend -7.1 (-14.5, -0.2)
Hall County 6 Urban 17.2 (13.2, 22.1) 22 (8, 24) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.1)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 19.1 (17.1, 21.4) 17 (9, 23) 65 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Sarpy County 6 Urban 23.0 (19.8, 26.4) 9 (3, 18) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Saunders County 6 Urban 19.0 (12.5, 28.0) 20 (3, 24) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 7.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 20.8 (14.3, 29.8) 14 (2, 24) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.4, 3.6)
Adams County 6 Rural 26.8 (20.0, 35.4) 2 (1, 20) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Box Butte County 6 Rural 23.7 (13.8, 38.7) 8 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Buffalo County 6 Rural 19.1 (14.3, 25.0) 19 (4, 24) 11 stable stable trend -12.6 (-28.2, 2.6)
Custer County 6 Rural 22.9 (13.6, 37.3) 10 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Dawson County 6 Rural 24.5 (17.0, 34.2) 5 (1, 23) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.5, 2.1)
Dodge County 6 Rural 18.4 (13.6, 24.5) 21 (5, 24) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.4)
Gage County 6 Rural 21.5 (15.1, 30.3) 12 (2, 24) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.1)
Keith County 6 Rural 23.9 (14.1, 40.2) 7 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 22.3 (16.9, 29.1) 11 (2, 23) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.6, 5.3)
Madison County 6 Rural 15.3 (10.5, 21.7) 24 (8, 24) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 3.1)
Nemaha County 6 Rural 39.5 (24.0, 62.8) 1 (1, 17) 4 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.2, 12.4)
Otoe County 6 Rural 24.5 (16.4, 35.7) 6 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 7.4)
Platte County 6 Rural 24.7 (18.4, 32.6) 4 (1, 22) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.4)
Richardson County 6 Rural 25.0 (14.4, 42.3) 3 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Scotts Bluff County 6 Rural 20.2 (15.3, 26.5) 15 (3, 24) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.1)
York County 6 Rural 16.5 (9.7, 27.0) 23 (3, 24) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 1.8)
Antelope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arthur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cedar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colfax County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cuming County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dixon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Furnas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearney County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Merrick County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nuckolls County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phelps County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Willow County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saline County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seward County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thayer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thurston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 2:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Antelope, Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Boone, Boyd, Brown, Burt, Butler, Cedar, Chase, Cherry, Cheyenne, Clay, Colfax, Cuming, Dawes, Deuel, Dixon, Dundy, Fillmore, Franklin, Frontier, Furnas, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Hamilton, Harlan, Hayes, Hitchcock, Holt, Hooker, Howard, Jefferson, Johnson, Kearney, Keya Paha, Kimball, Knox, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Merrick, Morrill, Nance, Nuckolls, Pawnee, Perkins, Phelps, Pierce, Polk, Red Willow, Rock, Saline, Seward, Sheridan, Sherman, Sioux, Stanton, Thayer, Thomas, Thurston, Valley, Wayne, Webster, Wheeler

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top