Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Jersey by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey 7 143.3 (141.9, 144.8) N/A 7,783 stable stable trend 3.6 (-2.1, 7.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Hudson County 7 114.1 (108.7, 119.8) 21 (19, 21) 344 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 6.1)
Warren County 7 120.0 (109.0, 131.9) 20 (14, 21) 92 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.8)
Sussex County 7 124.7 (114.7, 135.3) 19 (13, 21) 128 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.1)
Ocean County 7 127.7 (123.0, 132.6) 18 (14, 20) 563 stable stable trend 6.6 (-3.0, 13.6)
Atlantic County 7 127.9 (120.5, 135.7) 17 (13, 20) 231 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Hunterdon County 7 130.0 (119.6, 141.3) 16 (10, 20) 124 rising rising trend 7.5 (4.4, 12.8)
Middlesex County 7 135.1 (130.3, 139.9) 15 (11, 18) 645 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.8, 7.8)
Somerset County 7 136.0 (128.7, 143.6) 14 (9, 19) 277 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Bergen County 7 137.3 (133.1, 141.6) 13 (10, 16) 823 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 5.1)
Salem County 7 142.2 (126.6, 159.5) 12 (2, 20) 63 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Morris County 7 142.4 (136.5, 148.5) 11 (7, 15) 463 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Passaic County 7 145.8 (139.4, 152.5) 10 (5, 14) 405 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Cumberland County 7 148.6 (137.1, 160.9) 9 (2, 15) 128 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Monmouth County 7 150.2 (144.9, 155.7) 8 (4, 12) 636 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.4, 10.2)
Camden County 7 151.9 (145.6, 158.5) 7 (3, 11) 456 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Union County 7 154.8 (148.5, 161.3) 6 (2, 10) 478 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.8, 10.8)
Gloucester County 7 156.5 (148.2, 165.2) 5 (1, 10) 284 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Cape May County 7 158.0 (145.9, 171.1) 4 (1, 11) 135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Mercer County 7 158.4 (150.8, 166.4) 3 (1, 9) 337 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Burlington County 7 165.9 (159.1, 172.8) 2 (1, 5) 480 stable stable trend 2.8 (-4.0, 10.8)
Essex County 7 167.5 (161.8, 173.3) 1 (1, 4) 690 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.3, 8.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 5:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top