Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Jersey by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey 7 22.0 (21.6, 22.4) N/A 2,487 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.9 (18.8, 19.0) N/A 74,016 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.5)
Hudson County 7 15.5 (14.1, 16.9) 21 (20, 21) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Essex County 7 16.8 (15.6, 18.1) 20 (19, 21) 147 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Union County 7 18.9 (17.4, 20.5) 19 (15, 20) 122 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Somerset County 7 19.7 (17.8, 21.8) 18 (11, 20) 82 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Passaic County 7 20.2 (18.6, 21.9) 17 (11, 19) 118 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Bergen County 7 20.9 (19.7, 22.1) 16 (11, 19) 266 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Mercer County 7 21.2 (19.3, 23.3) 15 (8, 19) 94 falling falling trend -3.2 (-11.2, -1.5)
Middlesex County 7 21.4 (20.1, 22.8) 14 (9, 18) 210 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Camden County 7 22.0 (20.4, 23.8) 13 (7, 18) 136 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Morris County 7 22.8 (21.2, 24.6) 12 (5, 16) 152 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Atlantic County 7 23.1 (20.9, 25.4) 11 (3, 17) 85 falling falling trend -4.5 (-11.3, -1.1)
Warren County 7 23.9 (20.5, 27.8) 10 (1, 18) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Salem County 7 23.9 (19.5, 29.1) 9 (1, 19) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Cumberland County 7 24.0 (20.9, 27.5) 8 (2, 17) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Burlington County 7 24.5 (22.7, 26.4) 7 (3, 13) 146 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Gloucester County 7 24.7 (22.4, 27.2) 6 (2, 14) 89 falling falling trend -5.2 (-13.3, -0.6)
Monmouth County 7 25.1 (23.6, 26.7) 5 (2, 11) 216 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Sussex County 7 25.5 (22.3, 29.1) 4 (1, 15) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Hunterdon County 7 25.6 (22.3, 29.3) 3 (1, 15) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.3)
Ocean County 7 27.6 (26.1, 29.1) 2 (1, 5) 276 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.4, 8.7)
Cape May County 7 29.8 (26.0, 34.2) 1 (1, 7) 50 falling falling trend -4.1 (-13.6, -1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/22/2024 9:39 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top