Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for New Mexico by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
New Mexico7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.9 to 95.8 and 1,144 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 0.6.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 106.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.3 to 106.7 and 208,914 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to -0.2.
Santa Fe County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 88.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.0 to 98.4 and 74 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (5, 22)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 7.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.4 to 14.8.
Torrance County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 125.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 94.1 to 163.7 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.8 to 4.5.
Dona Ana County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.8 to 110.5 and 121 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (2, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.9 to 2.0.
McKinley County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 79.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.6 to 92.4 and 33 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (8, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.3 to 2.5.
Socorro County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 95.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 68.3 to 128.5 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 2.6.
Luna County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 89.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.9 to 116.3 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 3.4.
Lea County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 99.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.5 to 114.0 and 43 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 19)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.9.
Rio Arriba County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 67.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 53.4 to 85.2 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (12, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 1.9.
San Miguel County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 84.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.0 to 108.3 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (2, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 2.1.
Roosevelt County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 95.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 70.3 to 126.3 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 2.7.
Quay County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 77.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 45.0 to 123.9 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.6.
Valencia County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 103.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.2 to 117.8 and 45 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 1.2.
Grant County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 81.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.5 to 106.3 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (2, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.3.
San Juan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 83.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.2 to 93.0 and 63 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (8, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 1.2.
Taos County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 91.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.6 to 114.6 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 1.6.
Bernalillo County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 97.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.2 to 101.8 and 409 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (3, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 0.6.
Cibola County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 91.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.8 to 115.0 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 1.5.
Eddy County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.3 to 109.4 and 32 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (2, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 1.3.
Los Alamos County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 120.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.4 to 154.0 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 1.7.
Sandoval County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 98.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.5 to 108.4 and 86 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (2, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 1.1.
Chaves County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 78.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.5 to 93.0 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (8, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 0.6.
Colfax County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 55.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 31.2 to 89.4 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (8, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.8.
Lincoln County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 68.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.6 to 97.7 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (5, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.0.
Sierra County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 77.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.7 to 123.8 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to 1.0.
Curry County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 88.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.7 to 105.8 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (2, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.2 to 3.2.
Otero County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 84.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.7 to 99.1 and 32 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (4, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -8.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -16.4 to -0.4.
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/05/2023 3:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Catron, DeBaca, Guadalupe, Harding, Hidalgo, Mora, Union
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.