Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Mexico by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico 7 N/A 13.7 (13.0, 14.3) N/A 379 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Bernalillo County 7 Urban 13.2 (12.1, 14.4) 15 (8, 18) 112 falling falling trend -5.5 (-12.3, -0.7)
Dona Ana County 7 Urban 15.8 (13.7, 18.2) 7 (2, 15) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.2)
Santa Fe County 7 Urban 14.4 (12.4, 16.7) 9 (4, 18) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.7)
Sandoval County 7 Urban 17.9 (15.3, 20.9) 3 (1, 11) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.9)
San Juan County 7 Urban 10.8 (8.5, 13.6) 20 (10, 21) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Otero County 7 Rural 17.2 (13.5, 21.7) 5 (1, 16) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.5)
Valencia County 7 Urban 13.2 (10.2, 17.0) 14 (3, 21) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.7)
Chaves County 7 Rural 14.3 (10.8, 18.8) 10 (2, 20) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Eddy County 7 Rural 15.9 (11.9, 20.9) 6 (1, 19) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Lea County 7 Rural 13.7 (9.9, 18.5) 12 (2, 21) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.4)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 20.3 (14.1, 29.3) 1 (1, 17) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.1)
Rio Arriba County 7 Rural 11.5 (7.9, 16.5) 17 (4, 21) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.5)
San Miguel County 7 Rural 13.5 (9.0, 19.9) 13 (1, 21) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.3)
Grant County 7 Rural 11.3 (7.2, 17.4) 19 (3, 22) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Curry County 7 Rural 11.4 (7.5, 16.5) 18 (4, 21) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Sierra County 7 Rural 19.5 (12.5, 31.6) 2 (1, 20) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.3)
Taos County 7 Rural 8.4 (5.3, 13.1) 21 (12, 22) 5
*
*
Luna County 7 Rural 12.6 (8.0, 19.2) 16 (2, 21) 5 falling falling trend -7.7 (-28.9, -2.2)
Los Alamos County 7 Rural 17.3 (10.8, 26.7) 4 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Colfax County 7 Rural 14.2 (8.5, 24.2) 11 (1, 21) 4
*
*
McKinley County 7 Rural 5.0 (2.9, 8.0) 22 (20, 22) 4
*
*
Torrance County 7 Urban 15.3 (8.8, 25.5) 8 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Catron County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cibola County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Baca County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guadalupe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mora County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roosevelt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Socorro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 5:04 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Catron, Cibola, DeBaca, Guadalupe, Harding, Hidalgo, Mora, Quay, Roosevelt, Socorro, Union

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top