Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Mexico by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico 7 N/A 17.4 (16.3, 18.5) N/A 229 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) N/A 57,211 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 3.7)
Los Alamos County 7 Rural 32.7 (19.3, 52.5) 1 (1, 9) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Valencia County 7 Urban 23.9 (17.6, 31.7) 2 (1, 9) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.9)
Santa Fe County 7 Urban 22.2 (18.2, 26.8) 3 (1, 8) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.8)
San Miguel County 7 Rural 21.5 (12.8, 34.4) 4 (1, 12) 4
*
*
Sandoval County 7 Urban 21.3 (17.2, 26.1) 5 (1, 9) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 1.1)
Bernalillo County 7 Urban 20.8 (18.8, 23.0) 6 (2, 8) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Rio Arriba County 7 Rural 19.0 (11.8, 29.2) 7 (1, 13) 5
*
*
Otero County 7 Rural 18.4 (12.8, 25.8) 8 (2, 12) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 5.3)
Dona Ana County 7 Urban 15.5 (12.4, 19.2) 9 (6, 12) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.5)
Lea County 7 Rural 12.5 (7.7, 19.3) 10 (6, 14) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.3)
Chaves County 7 Rural 12.2 (7.8, 18.3) 11 (7, 14) 5 falling falling trend -13.4 (-32.3, -3.2)
Eddy County 7 Rural 12.1 (7.1, 19.1) 12 (6, 14) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.2)
Taos County 7 Rural 10.3 (5.8, 18.2) 13 (7, 14) 3
*
*
San Juan County 7 Urban 8.5 (5.6, 12.3) 14 (10, 14) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.7)
Catron County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cibola County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colfax County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Curry County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Baca County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guadalupe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luna County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McKinley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mora County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roosevelt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Socorro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Torrance County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 3:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Catron, Cibola, Colfax, Curry, DeBaca, Grant, Guadalupe, Harding, Hidalgo, Lincoln, Luna, McKinley, Mora, Quay, Roosevelt, Sierra, Socorro, Torrance, Union

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top