Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico 3,8 *** 373.8 (370.2, 377.4) 8,812 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 443.6 (443.3, 443.9) 1,556,536 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Bernalillo County 7,8 *** 392.5 (386.0, 399.1) 2,863 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Dona Ana County 7,8 *** 380.0 (368.4, 391.8) 837 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.7)
Santa Fe County 7,8 *** 341.1 (329.1, 353.4) 677 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.7, -2.6)
Sandoval County 7,8 *** 389.5 (375.2, 404.2) 598 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
San Juan County 7,8 *** 351.4 (336.7, 366.6) 445 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Valencia County 7,8 *** 384.5 (365.8, 404.0) 335 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Otero County 7,8 *** 390.0 (369.8, 411.0) 292 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Chaves County 7,8 *** 357.6 (338.2, 377.8) 263 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -0.7)
Eddy County 7,8 *** 358.8 (337.6, 381.0) 223 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.4, -0.3)
Lea County 7,8 *** 354.4 (333.4, 376.3) 218 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
McKinley County 7,8 *** 317.7 (298.1, 338.1) 206 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Grant County 7,8 *** 364.1 (338.1, 391.7) 169 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Rio Arriba County 7,8 *** 345.3 (321.5, 370.4) 166 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Curry County 7,8 *** 350.9 (327.0, 376.0) 164 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Taos County 7,8 *** 318.3 (294.9, 343.2) 154 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -1.0)
Luna County 7,8 *** 393.1 (362.9, 425.4) 136 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
San Miguel County 7,8 *** 358.4 (330.5, 388.2) 131 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Lincoln County 7,8 *** 363.6 (332.0, 397.9) 119 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Cibola County 7,8 *** 345.0 (315.3, 376.9) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Sierra County 7,8 *** 394.7 (354.1, 439.8) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Los Alamos County 7,8 *** 393.9 (357.5, 433.3) 92 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Torrance County 7,8 *** 408.4 (367.8, 452.5) 83 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Socorro County 7,8 *** 363.8 (327.5, 403.2) 78 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Colfax County 7,8 *** 368.2 (329.1, 411.1) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.7)
Roosevelt County 7,8 *** 333.2 (297.1, 372.4) 64 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.7, -1.1)
Quay County 7,8 *** 406.5 (357.1, 461.7) 56 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Catron County 7,8 *** 325.7 (261.2, 407.2) 25 falling falling trend -8.6 (-14.2, -2.7)
Mora County 7,8 *** 349.2 (287.6, 421.9) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Hidalgo County 7,8 *** 327.1 (265.1, 400.4) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Guadalupe County 7,8 *** 335.2 (270.3, 411.9) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Union County 7,8 *** 260.6 (205.8, 327.1) 16 stable stable trend 7.0 (-10.3, 27.6)
De Baca County 7,8 *** 419.4 (314.3, 553.1) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Harding County 7,8 *** 681.5 (449.1, 1,013.4) 8 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.2, 6.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/17/2017 9:04 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top