Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New Mexico by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
New Mexico 3,8 Yes 33.9 (32.9, 35.0) 797 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.8 (39.7, 39.9) 139,083 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Bernalillo County 7,8 Yes 33.9 (32.0, 35.8) 247 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Catron County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaves County 7,8 Yes 30.5 (25.0, 36.9) 22 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.0, -1.6)
Cibola County 7,8 No 42.7 (32.6, 54.9) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Colfax County 7,8 Yes 33.0 (23.2, 46.7) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Curry County 7,8 Yes 32.7 (25.6, 41.0) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
De Baca County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dona Ana County 7,8 Yes 32.5 (29.2, 36.1) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Eddy County 7,8 Yes 33.4 (27.2, 40.7) 21 falling falling trend -8.3 (-15.6, -0.3)
Grant County 7,8 Yes 32.8 (25.4, 42.0) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Guadalupe County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County 7,8 No 56.3 (31.3, 94.0) 3 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.5, 6.8)
Lea County 7,8 Yes 36.5 (30.0, 43.9) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Lincoln County 7,8 Yes 26.4 (18.9, 36.7) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.4)
Los Alamos County 7,8 Yes 30.2 (20.6, 43.2) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Luna County 7,8 Yes 39.5 (30.7, 50.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
McKinley County 7,8 Yes 37.7 (31.2, 45.1) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Mora County 7 No 43.4 (24.3, 74.5) 3
*
*
Otero County 7,8 Yes 32.7 (27.2, 39.1) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Quay County 7,8 No 44.5 (29.8, 65.2) 6 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.3)
Rio Arriba County 7,8 No 40.4 (32.6, 49.7) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Roosevelt County 7,8 Yes 36.3 (25.0, 51.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
San Juan County 7,8 Yes 31.1 (26.8, 35.8) 40 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.9, -2.4)
San Miguel County 7,8 No 42.6 (33.5, 53.7) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Sandoval County 7,8 Yes 35.2 (30.9, 39.8) 53 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Santa Fe County 7,8 Yes 29.9 (26.4, 33.7) 59 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Sierra County 7,8 Yes 34.5 (22.8, 51.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Socorro County 7,8 No 44.3 (32.2, 59.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Taos County 7,8 Yes 30.6 (24.0, 38.8) 15 falling falling trend -13.1 (-23.9, -0.9)
Torrance County 7,8 Yes 38.1 (26.6, 53.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Union County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valencia County 7,8 Yes 34.3 (28.8, 40.6) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2017 12:35 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top