## Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data

### Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

**Explanation of Column Headers**

**Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval)**- The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.

**Recent Trends** - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:

**Rising**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.**Stable**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.**Falling**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.

**AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval)** - the change in rate over time

- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.

**Other Notes**

**Line by Line Interpretation of the Report**

#### New Mexico^{3,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 41.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 40.7 to 43.1 and 967 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to -1.6.

#### US (SEER+NPCR)^{1,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 62.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.3 to 62.6 and 214,614 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to -2.0.

#### Quay County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 62.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 45.1 to 84.7 and 9 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 3.3.

#### Otero County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 58.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 51.0 to 66.8 and 45 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 2.0.

#### Lea County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 57.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 49.3 to 67.1 and 34 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to -0.1.

#### Luna County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 56.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.5 to 69.1 and 22 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 1.8.

#### Roosevelt County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 55.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 41.1 to 72.5 and 10 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.7 to 0.6.

#### Sierra County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 55.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 43.5 to 70.9 and 16 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.1.

#### Valencia County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 50.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.0 to 58.3 and 42 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 1.0.

#### Cibola County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 50.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 39.6 to 63.7 and 15 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 1.7.

#### Torrance County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 49.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 36.3 to 65.1 and 11 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 0.5.

#### Socorro County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 47.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 35.3 to 63.7 and 10 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 2.0.

#### Chaves County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 47.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 40.8 to 55.1 and 36 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -8.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.6 to -1.2.

#### Eddy County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 47.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 39.8 to 55.7 and 29 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 0.2.

#### Curry County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 46.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 38.3 to 56.6 and 21 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 1.2.

#### Lincoln County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 45.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 36.0 to 57.3 and 17 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 1.5.

#### Grant County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 44.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 36.4 to 54.7 and 22 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 0.9.

#### San Juan County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 44.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 38.8 to 49.7 and 53 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.2.

#### Dona Ana County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 42.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 38.7 to 46.7 and 92 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 0.0.

#### Catron County^{7}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 41.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 24.0 to 77.3 and 4 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

#### Sandoval County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 40.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 35.7 to 45.5 and 58 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 0.1.

#### Bernalillo County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 39.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 37.4 to 41.6 and 277 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to -0.9.

#### Colfax County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 38.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 27.6 to 52.3 and 9 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 1.4.

#### San Miguel County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 37.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 28.9 to 47.7 and 14 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 0.4.

#### Taos County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 35.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 27.5 to 44.1 and 16 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.3.

#### Rio Arriba County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 34.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 27.5 to 43.5 and 16 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 1.5.

#### Santa Fe County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 31.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 28.1 to 35.7 and 59 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.9.

#### Los Alamos County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 26.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.1 to 38.0 and 7 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.2 to 0.6.

#### McKinley County^{7,8}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 13.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 9.7 to 18.3 and 9 average annual cases over 2009-2013.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -3.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.3 to -0.7.

**De Baca County**

^{7}- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

**Guadalupe County**

^{7}- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

**Harding County**

^{7}- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

**Hidalgo County**

^{7}**Mora County**

^{7}**Union County**

^{7,8}**Notes:**

Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/31/2016 7:29 pm.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

^{1}Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in

*United States Cancer Statistics*.

^{3}Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.

^{7}Source: SEER November 2015 submission.

^{8}Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.

^{10}Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.