Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York 7 *** 2,105.7 (2,098.3, 2,113.2) N/A 63,661 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 1,975.9 (1,974.1, 1,977.7) N/A 952,920 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Albany County 7 *** 2,291.6 (2,230.5, 2,353.9) 23 (11, 38) 1,112 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Allegany County 7 *** 2,336.2 (2,189.9, 2,489.6) 17 (1, 47) 194 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Bronx County 7 *** 1,823.6 (1,795.0, 1,852.5) 60 (59, 62) 3,158 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Broome County 7 *** 2,121.4 (2,053.0, 2,191.5) 45 (33, 57) 748 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.6)
Cattaraugus County 7 *** 2,153.4 (2,043.9, 2,267.2) 42 (17, 57) 297 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Cayuga County 7 *** 2,261.7 (2,148.9, 2,378.9) 29 (6, 52) 310 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Chautauqua County 7 *** 2,212.0 (2,128.0, 2,298.4) 35 (16, 52) 536 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Chemung County 7 *** 2,272.4 (2,164.8, 2,383.9) 28 (5, 49) 344 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.2)
Chenango County 7 *** 2,327.7 (2,189.6, 2,472.2) 18 (2, 47) 217 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.4)
Clinton County 7 *** 2,251.0 (2,135.4, 2,371.2) 32 (6, 53) 290 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -0.9)
Columbia County 7 *** 2,169.2 (2,056.6, 2,286.2) 40 (15, 57) 286 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Cortland County 7 *** 2,355.2 (2,199.2, 2,519.3) 14 (1, 48) 173 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Delaware County 7 *** 2,030.5 (1,909.0, 2,157.7) 56 (34, 59) 212 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Dutchess County 7 *** 2,093.6 (2,035.6, 2,152.9) 52 (37, 57) 1,006 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Erie County 7 *** 2,405.7 (2,370.9, 2,440.8) 9 (3, 18) 3,752 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Essex County 7 *** 2,075.5 (1,936.8, 2,221.4) 54 (20, 59) 170 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Franklin County 7 *** 2,196.6 (2,051.4, 2,349.3) 37 (7, 57) 174 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Fulton County 7 *** 2,455.2 (2,316.8, 2,599.7) 5 (1, 31) 243 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Genesee County 7 *** 2,339.0 (2,207.0, 2,476.8) 16 (2, 45) 239 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Greene County 7 *** 2,205.7 (2,074.2, 2,343.3) 36 (8, 57) 215 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Hamilton County 7 *** 2,535.9 (2,150.7, 2,969.9) 2 (1, 58) 32 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.2)
Herkimer County 7 *** 2,277.2 (2,156.0, 2,403.4) 26 (3, 52) 271 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County 7 *** 2,542.6 (2,426.0, 2,663.3) 1 (1, 15) 367 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Kings County 7 *** 1,819.3 (1,798.8, 1,840.0) 61 (59, 62) 6,171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Lewis County 7 *** 2,394.0 (2,196.4, 2,604.5) 11 (1, 51) 110 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Livingston County 7 *** 2,325.4 (2,194.5, 2,461.9) 20 (2, 49) 243 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.7)
Madison County 7 *** 2,138.2 (2,021.0, 2,260.5) 44 (18, 58) 254 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Monroe County 7 *** 2,284.7 (2,245.9, 2,324.0) 24 (14, 35) 2,728 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Montgomery County 7 *** 2,430.5 (2,282.8, 2,585.2) 6 (1, 39) 212 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Nassau County 7 *** 2,235.3 (2,207.6, 2,263.4) 33 (23, 40) 5,137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
New York County 7 *** 1,903.4 (1,879.4, 1,927.7) 59 (56, 59) 4,856 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Niagara County 7 *** 2,400.2 (2,329.8, 2,472.2) 10 (2, 25) 904 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.0)
Oneida County 7 *** 2,216.7 (2,151.6, 2,283.2) 34 (18, 48) 908 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Onondaga County 7 *** 2,325.6 (2,275.8, 2,376.1) 19 (9, 31) 1,719 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Ontario County 7 *** 2,319.5 (2,224.6, 2,417.4) 22 (4, 41) 466 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.7, 9.9)
Orange County 7 *** 2,174.7 (2,115.9, 2,234.7) 39 (26, 52) 1,072 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Orleans County 7 *** 2,457.2 (2,291.7, 2,631.5) 4 (1, 36) 168 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Oswego County 7 *** 2,387.0 (2,284.8, 2,492.5) 13 (1, 34) 425 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Otsego County 7 *** 2,059.8 (1,944.4, 2,180.3) 55 (28, 59) 244 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Putnam County 7 *** 2,159.9 (2,056.3, 2,267.3) 41 (19, 57) 337 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Queens County 7 *** 1,783.1 (1,762.7, 1,803.6) 62 (61, 62) 6,001 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Rensselaer County 7 *** 2,320.2 (2,234.9, 2,407.9) 21 (4, 40) 579 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Richmond County 7 *** 2,276.7 (2,226.8, 2,327.5) 27 (14, 38) 1,630 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Rockland County 7 *** 2,102.0 (2,044.4, 2,160.7) 50 (36, 57) 1,030 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Saratoga County 7 *** 2,393.5 (2,322.6, 2,465.9) 12 (2, 26) 896 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Schenectady County 7 *** 2,177.4 (2,094.6, 2,262.7) 38 (20, 55) 546 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Schoharie County 7 *** 2,147.2 (1,986.2, 2,317.8) 43 (9, 59) 135 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Schuyler County 7 *** 2,344.7 (2,119.3, 2,587.5) 15 (1, 56) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Seneca County 7 *** 2,258.4 (2,092.3, 2,434.3) 31 (2, 57) 141 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
St. Lawrence County 7 *** 2,115.9 (2,020.5, 2,214.8) 46 (26, 58) 377 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Steuben County 7 *** 2,112.9 (2,017.2, 2,212.0) 48 (27, 58) 374 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Suffolk County 7 *** 2,416.2 (2,387.9, 2,444.9) 7 (2, 16) 5,659 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Sullivan County 7 *** 2,009.5 (1,901.5, 2,122.0) 57 (38, 59) 268 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tioga County 7 *** 2,093.4 (1,962.9, 2,230.2) 53 (22, 59) 194 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Tompkins County 7 *** 1,938.4 (1,831.8, 2,049.7) 58 (47, 62) 260 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Ulster County 7 *** 2,097.6 (2,026.5, 2,170.6) 51 (35, 57) 681 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Warren County 7 *** 2,415.3 (2,296.7, 2,538.4) 8 (1, 33) 319 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Washington County 7 *** 2,282.5 (2,157.3, 2,413.0) 25 (3, 51) 254 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Wayne County 7 *** 2,258.4 (2,152.9, 2,367.7) 30 (6, 51) 354 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Westchester County 7 *** 2,106.4 (2,073.9, 2,139.2) 49 (39, 55) 3,317 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Wyoming County 7 *** 2,472.0 (2,301.5, 2,651.8) 3 (1, 37) 161 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Yates County 7 *** 2,114.7 (1,931.8, 2,310.2) 47 (8, 60) 101 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/21/2021 3:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top