Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York 7 N/A 134.1 (133.1, 135.0) N/A 17,074 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 129.8 (129.5, 130.0) N/A 258,398 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Albany County 7 Urban 146.7 (138.9, 154.9) 12 (2, 34) 293 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.6, 5.1)
Bronx County 7 Urban 112.4 (109.2, 115.7) 61 (54, 62) 953 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
Broome County 7 Urban 141.3 (131.7, 151.5) 18 (3, 48) 186 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.5)
Chemung County 7 Urban 144.6 (130.1, 160.4) 14 (1, 53) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Dutchess County 7 Urban 133.4 (125.8, 141.2) 38 (13, 53) 263 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Erie County 7 Urban 139.4 (135.1, 143.8) 21 (12, 39) 898 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 0.4)
Herkimer County 7 Urban 127.1 (111.3, 144.7) 49 (5, 61) 54 stable stable trend 10.0 (-3.8, 18.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 131.3 (118.3, 145.4) 40 (6, 60) 80 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Kings County 7 Urban 122.9 (120.4, 125.4) 53 (42, 58) 1,932 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 5.3)
Livingston County 7 Urban 153.2 (135.4, 172.8) 6 (1, 49) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Madison County 7 Urban 128.0 (112.7, 144.9) 48 (6, 61) 58 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Monroe County 7 Urban 152.5 (147.4, 157.7) 7 (1, 17) 753 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Nassau County 7 Urban 146.8 (143.2, 150.6) 11 (4, 23) 1,345 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
New York County 7 Urban 136.9 (133.6, 140.2) 26 (17, 41) 1,424 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.7)
Niagara County 7 Urban 139.5 (130.7, 148.8) 20 (5, 48) 211 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Oneida County 7 Urban 122.7 (114.5, 131.3) 54 (31, 61) 192 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.3, 4.9)
Onondaga County 7 Urban 137.4 (131.3, 143.7) 24 (11, 46) 422 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Ontario County 7 Urban 150.4 (137.9, 163.8) 8 (1, 40) 123 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 3.0)
Orange County 7 Urban 129.0 (122.3, 136.0) 46 (22, 57) 291 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Orleans County 7 Urban 139.0 (118.5, 162.3) 22 (1, 61) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Oswego County 7 Urban 136.5 (124.2, 149.7) 27 (4, 57) 100 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.1, 2.4)
Putnam County 7 Urban 156.9 (143.0, 172.0) 2 (1, 31) 104 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 5.7)
Queens County 7 Urban 124.6 (122.0, 127.2) 51 (40, 56) 1,877 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 5.3)
Rensselaer County 7 Urban 134.4 (124.1, 145.4) 33 (8, 56) 139 stable stable trend 6.0 (-0.2, 9.9)
Richmond County 7 Urban 138.9 (132.9, 145.1) 23 (9, 43) 440 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Rockland County 7 Urban 132.0 (124.5, 139.8) 39 (14, 55) 255 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Saratoga County 7 Urban 148.7 (140.0, 157.8) 9 (1, 34) 238 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 7.6)
Schenectady County 7 Urban 141.4 (130.8, 152.6) 17 (3, 50) 146 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Schoharie County 7 Urban 130.0 (108.8, 154.7) 44 (2, 62) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Suffolk County 7 Urban 140.7 (137.3, 144.2) 19 (11, 35) 1,403 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Tioga County 7 Urban 146.3 (127.3, 167.5) 13 (1, 57) 50 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Tompkins County 7 Urban 136.3 (122.3, 151.5) 28 (2, 58) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Ulster County 7 Urban 128.4 (119.0, 138.3) 47 (15, 59) 161 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Warren County 7 Urban 153.6 (137.5, 171.4) 5 (1, 44) 78 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Washington County 7 Urban 134.1 (117.8, 152.1) 36 (2, 61) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.6)
Wayne County 7 Urban 147.5 (133.6, 162.7) 10 (1, 47) 92 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Westchester County 7 Urban 144.2 (140.0, 148.6) 15 (6, 30) 940 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Allegany County 7 Rural 122.3 (103.5, 143.6) 55 (5, 62) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Cattaraugus County 7 Rural 116.9 (103.3, 131.9) 60 (22, 62) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Cayuga County 7 Rural 133.9 (119.2, 150.1) 37 (3, 60) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Chautauqua County 7 Rural 131.2 (120.3, 142.9) 42 (10, 59) 121 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 2.9)
Chenango County 7 Rural 119.8 (102.7, 139.2) 56 (10, 62) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Clinton County 7 Rural 126.3 (111.8, 142.3) 50 (7, 61) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Columbia County 7 Rural 136.1 (120.6, 153.3) 31 (2, 60) 66 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.5, 11.3)
Cortland County 7 Rural 136.1 (117.1, 157.5) 30 (1, 61) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Delaware County 7 Rural 131.2 (112.8, 152.1) 41 (2, 61) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.7)
Essex County 7 Rural 92.6 (76.2, 112.0) 62 (52, 62) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Franklin County 7 Rural 119.0 (101.3, 139.0) 57 (9, 62) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Fulton County 7 Rural 123.8 (108.2, 141.3) 52 (8, 62) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Genesee County 7 Rural 134.1 (117.8, 152.2) 35 (2, 61) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Greene County 7 Rural 135.5 (117.8, 155.4) 32 (2, 61) 50 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 155.2 (95.0, 244.7) 3 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Lewis County 7 Rural 141.9 (116.9, 171.1) 16 (1, 61) 25 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.5)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 137.1 (118.7, 157.8) 25 (1, 61) 45 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Otsego County 7 Rural 136.2 (118.4, 156.0) 29 (1, 61) 52 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.6)
Schuyler County 7 Rural 159.2 (128.1, 196.2) 1 (1, 60) 21 rising rising trend 7.4 (0.7, 22.8)
Seneca County 7 Rural 130.2 (108.0, 156.0) 43 (1, 62) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
St. Lawrence County 7 Rural 118.3 (106.6, 131.0) 58 (28, 62) 84 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 11.0)
Steuben County 7 Rural 134.2 (121.0, 148.4) 34 (4, 59) 87 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.2, 10.5)
Sullivan County 7 Rural 117.2 (103.1, 132.8) 59 (22, 62) 57 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Wyoming County 7 Rural 154.1 (132.2, 179.0) 4 (1, 55) 40 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Yates County 7 Rural 129.5 (104.3, 159.2) 45 (1, 62) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 3:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top