Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

All Cancer Sites, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
New York 6,10 482.5 (481.1, 483.8) 105,987 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 448.4 (448.1, 448.7) 1,540,559 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Queens County 6,10 429.6 (425.9, 433.3) 10,547 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Lewis County 6,10 445.6 (413.7, 479.5) 150 stable stable trend -1.4 (-10.0, 8.1)
Kings County 6,10 449.3 (445.5, 453.0) 11,323 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.4)
Essex County 6,10 450.3 (424.8, 477.1) 249 stable stable trend -3.1 (-12.1, 6.7)
Delaware County 6,10 450.6 (427.6, 474.7) 315 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 0.9)
Bronx County 6,10 451.9 (446.7, 457.2) 5,913 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
New York County 6,10 457.6 (453.1, 462.2) 8,079 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Franklin County 6,10 458.9 (434.5, 484.5) 271 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.6, 2.1)
Columbia County 6,10 465.5 (444.9, 486.8) 419 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.6)
Ulster County 6,10 466.9 (454.2, 479.9) 1,073 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.9)
Steuben County 6,10 467.8 (450.7, 485.4) 592 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.7)
Livingston County 6,10 468.3 (446.2, 491.3) 354 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.2, 9.6)
Sullivan County 6,10 468.3 (448.7, 488.7) 450 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 3.9)
Schenectady County 6,10 469.9 (455.7, 484.5) 873 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 3.5)
Schoharie County 6,10 473.1 (443.1, 504.7) 198 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.8, 5.5)
Tompkins County 6,10 474.0 (454.0, 494.6) 451 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.8, 3.0)
Cayuga County 6,10 474.1 (454.7, 494.1) 473 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.9, 3.7)
Otsego County 6,10 474.2 (452.3, 497.0) 381 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.9, 8.2)
Herkimer County 6,10 475.0 (453.9, 496.9) 404 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Seneca County 6,10 478.1 (449.0, 508.7) 212 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.9, 2.3)
Westchester County 6,10 480.0 (474.2, 485.8) 5,451 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
St. Lawrence County 6,10 480.3 (463.2, 497.8) 620 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.6, 1.3)
Schuyler County 6,10 482.9 (444.2, 524.4) 120 stable stable trend -7.2 (-18.3, 5.4)
Dutchess County 6,10 483.2 (472.7, 493.8) 1,685 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Yates County 6,10 487.5 (452.7, 524.4) 157 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 4.0)
Tioga County 6,10 488.8 (464.4, 514.1) 317 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.7, 6.8)
Ontario County 6,10 489.0 (472.1, 506.4) 675 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.5, 5.6)
Oneida County 6,10 489.6 (478.1, 501.4) 1,450 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.8, 3.0)
Jefferson County 6,10 490.1 (471.6, 509.0) 546 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.9, 4.7)
Greene County 6,10 492.3 (468.2, 517.3) 332 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.4, 6.6)
Monroe County 6,10 493.5 (486.8, 500.4) 4,255 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.8)
Broome County 6,10 493.8 (481.2, 506.6) 1,238 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Rockland County 6,10 494.7 (484.1, 505.4) 1,721 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.2)
Madison County 6,10 496.0 (474.7, 518.0) 428 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.8)
Chemung County 6,10 496.6 (477.7, 516.0) 550 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.5, 3.0)
Orleans County 6,10 497.5 (470.1, 526.2) 256 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.0, 9.2)
Albany County 6,10 497.7 (487.1, 508.4) 1,765 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.2, 2.6)
Orange County 6,10 498.3 (488.1, 508.8) 1,876 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 500.3 (475.3, 526.4) 321 stable stable trend -1.7 (-9.8, 7.2)
Saratoga County 6,10 500.4 (488.0, 513.0) 1,301 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Allegany County 6,10 501.5 (475.4, 528.8) 291 stable stable trend 2.6 (-3.4, 9.0)
Fulton County 6,10 505.0 (481.2, 529.6) 358 stable stable trend -1.0 (-9.4, 8.2)
Cortland County 6,10 507.9 (481.0, 535.9) 278 stable stable trend -2.1 (-9.6, 6.0)
Nassau County 6,10 507.9 (503.0, 512.9) 8,452 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6,10 509.1 (438.7, 590.4) 44 stable stable trend 2.5 (-5.3, 10.9)
Clinton County 6,10 510.3 (489.8, 531.5) 479 stable stable trend -2.4 (-11.6, 7.9)
Richmond County 6,10 511.6 (502.8, 520.5) 2,681 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.5)
Washington County 6,10 511.6 (489.0, 535.0) 402 falling falling trend -6.7 (-11.3, -1.8)
Putnam County 6,10 512.4 (493.4, 531.9) 587 stable stable trend -0.0 (-3.0, 3.0)
Niagara County 6,10 513.1 (500.9, 525.5) 1,418 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.5, 4.9)
Cattaraugus County 6,10 513.1 (492.9, 533.9) 514 stable stable trend 0.8 (-6.1, 8.2)
Wayne County 6,10 515.2 (496.3, 534.8) 583 stable stable trend 1.1 (-8.1, 11.2)
Warren County 6,10 516.0 (494.5, 538.2) 465 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.7, 7.2)
Onondaga County 6,10 516.9 (508.2, 525.7) 2,812 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.2)
Genesee County 6,10 517.4 (494.2, 541.5) 391 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 1.9)
Rensselaer County 6,10 518.9 (504.0, 534.1) 960 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.7, 0.9)
Chenango County 6,10 520.3 (495.2, 546.4) 344 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.0, 0.6)
Suffolk County 6,10 525.3 (520.4, 530.3) 9,030 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Oswego County 6,10 525.3 (507.7, 543.4) 707 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.7)
Erie County 6,10 540.5 (534.3, 546.7) 6,147 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.7)
Chautauqua County 6,10 547.1 (531.2, 563.3) 952 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.4, 1.8)
Wyoming County 6,10 547.6 (518.2, 578.4) 270 stable stable trend -5.2 (-10.6, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/25/2016 12:30 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top