Incidence Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | N/A | 12.8 (12.6, 13.1) | N/A | 1,661 |
rising 
|
0.9 (0.4, 1.4) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) | N/A | 47,920 |
stable 
|
-0.1 (-0.8, 0.4) |
| Currituck County 6 | Urban | 15.9 (10.4, 23.4) | 14 (1, 89) | 6 |
stable
|
5.1 (-0.2, 13.4) |
| Richmond County 6 | Rural | 17.4 (12.8, 23.3) | 4 (1, 82) | 10 |
rising
|
4.4 (0.8, 9.2) |
| McDowell County 6 | Rural | 19.7 (15.0, 25.6) | 2 (1, 60) | 13 |
rising
|
4.1 (0.6, 8.4) |
| Rowan County 6 | Urban | 14.3 (11.9, 17.1) | 32 (5, 78) | 27 |
rising
|
3.8 (2.0, 6.0) |
| Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (13.8, 20.7) | 5 (1, 63) | 22 |
rising
|
3.7 (1.6, 6.3) |
| Macon County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (12.2, 22.8) | 8 (1, 84) | 11 |
stable
|
3.5 (-0.8, 9.0) |
| Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 15.3 (12.8, 18.1) | 19 (3, 70) | 38 |
rising
|
2.7 (1.1, 4.7) |
| Stanly County 6 | Rural | 15.3 (11.8, 19.6) | 18 (1, 84) | 14 |
stable
|
2.7 (0.0, 6.0) |
| Catawba County 6 | Urban | 13.5 (11.3, 16.0) | 49 (9, 83) | 29 |
rising
|
2.4 (0.1, 5.2) |
| Burke County 6 | Urban | 16.6 (13.6, 20.2) | 10 (1, 67) | 22 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.1, 6.1) |
| Alexander County 6 | Urban | 14.3 (10.0, 20.2) | 31 (1, 89) | 7 |
stable
|
2.2 (-3.0, 9.0) |
| Dare County 6 | Rural | 13.0 (9.2, 18.2) | 58 (3, 89) | 9 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.7, 7.2) |
| Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 16.9 (13.8, 20.6) | 6 (1, 64) | 22 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.5, 6.2) |
| Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 14.6 (11.5, 18.2) | 26 (3, 83) | 17 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.8, 4.9) |
| Orange County 6 | Urban | 12.6 (10.2, 15.4) | 63 (11, 87) | 21 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.1, 4.0) |
| Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 13.1 (8.9, 18.8) | 56 (1, 89) | 7 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.5, 6.8) |
| Avery County 6 | Rural | 15.5 (9.5, 24.7) | 16 (1, 89) | 4 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.6, 5.3) |
| Harnett County 6 | Rural | 14.6 (11.9, 17.8) | 23 (3, 80) | 20 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.0, 4.6) |
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 13.2 (10.2, 17.1) | 53 (5, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.0, 4.6) |
| Wake County 6 | Urban | 11.2 (10.3, 12.1) | 77 (53, 85) | 129 |
rising
|
1.5 (0.5, 2.7) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (10.8, 18.0) | 36 (4, 86) | 14 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.0, 4.1) |
| Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 13.9 (9.9, 19.3) | 40 (2, 89) | 8 |
stable
|
1.4 (-2.3, 5.7) |
| Gaston County 6 | Urban | 13.2 (11.3, 15.3) | 54 (15, 80) | 38 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.4, 3.2) |
| Davie County 6 | Urban | 14.5 (10.7, 19.6) | 28 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
1.2 (-1.9, 5.3) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 13.3 (11.3, 15.5) | 51 (11, 82) | 33 |
stable
|
1.1 (-1.3, 4.2) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 12.7 (10.7, 15.1) | 61 (15, 85) | 30 |
stable
|
1.1 (-1.1, 3.5) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 14.6 (10.6, 19.6) | 24 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.4, 4.9) |
| Guilford County 6 | Urban | 12.6 (11.4, 13.9) | 62 (27, 78) | 79 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.4, 2.8) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 13.9 (11.0, 17.6) | 38 (4, 86) | 16 |
stable
|
1.1 (-1.8, 4.7) |
| Union County 6 | Urban | 11.8 (10.0, 13.8) | 73 (25, 87) | 32 |
stable
|
1.1 (-1.4, 4.3) |
| Iredell County 6 | Urban | 15.2 (13.0, 17.7) | 20 (4, 70) | 36 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.2, 3.5) |
| New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 13.5 (11.6, 15.6) | 48 (12, 79) | 40 |
stable
|
1.0 (-2.1, 4.7) |
| Carteret County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (13.3, 20.9) | 9 (1, 70) | 20 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.2, 3.4) |
| Surry County 6 | Rural | 13.9 (10.9, 17.7) | 39 (4, 86) | 15 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.4, 4.5) |
| Watauga County 6 | Rural | 10.7 (7.3, 15.3) | 81 (13, 89) | 7 |
stable
|
0.9 (-3.0, 5.5) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 12.2 (10.6, 14.1) | 68 (24, 85) | 40 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.0, 2.7) |
| Duplin County 6 | Rural | 11.9 (8.3, 16.6) | 71 (5, 89) | 8 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.7, 3.6) |
| Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 12.6 (11.1, 14.1) | 65 (23, 81) | 59 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.3, 2.1) |
| Halifax County 6 | Rural | 15.5 (11.5, 20.6) | 15 (1, 85) | 11 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.2, 4.1) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 14.1 (9.7, 20.1) | 34 (1, 89) | 7 |
stable
|
0.8 (-5.1, 8.0) |
| Stokes County 6 | Urban | 13.3 (9.3, 18.6) | 50 (2, 89) | 8 |
stable
|
0.8 (-3.3, 5.3) |
| Wayne County 6 | Urban | 13.8 (11.2, 16.9) | 42 (5, 84) | 21 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.7, 3.5) |
| Randolph County 6 | Urban | 13.7 (11.4, 16.4) | 44 (7, 83) | 26 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.1, 2.4) |
| Craven County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (11.2, 17.3) | 37 (4, 83) | 19 |
stable
|
0.5 (-3.4, 4.7) |
| Nash County 6 | Urban | 12.9 (10.1, 16.2) | 60 (8, 88) | 16 |
stable
|
0.4 (-2.6, 3.6) |
| Sampson County 6 | Rural | 11.1 (8.0, 15.1) | 79 (9, 89) | 9 |
stable
|
0.4 (-3.0, 4.1) |
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 14.4 (8.7, 23.2) | 29 (1, 89) | 4 |
stable
|
0.3 (-5.3, 6.3) |
| Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 13.8 (12.2, 15.7) | 41 (10, 73) | 52 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.4, 2.0) |
| Robeson County 6 | Rural | 10.2 (7.9, 13.0) | 85 (32, 89) | 14 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.5, 2.9) |
| Onslow County 6 | Urban | 16.5 (13.7, 19.7) | 11 (1, 64) | 26 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.8, 3.3) |
| Henderson County 6 | Urban | 12.6 (10.3, 15.3) | 64 (12, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.3, 2.6) |
| Columbus County 6 | Rural | 13.8 (10.0, 18.6) | 43 (2, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.7, 2.6) |
| Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 10.5 (7.8, 14.0) | 83 (21, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-4.0, 4.0) |
| Alamance County 6 | Urban | 12.5 (10.5, 14.9) | 66 (14, 86) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.4, 1.1) |
| Durham County 6 | Urban | 10.4 (8.9, 12.1) | 84 (49, 89) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.0, 1.6) |
| Montgomery County 6 | Rural | 13.2 (8.4, 20.0) | 55 (1, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-3.4, 3.1) |
| Northampton County 6 | Rural | 14.9 (9.2, 23.8) | 22 (1, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-6.4, 6.6) |
| Swain County 6 | Rural | 20.4 (11.9, 32.9) | 1 (1, 89) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-8.3, 8.4) |
| Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (10.2, 19.1) | 35 (1, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.8, 3.0) |
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 12.5 (7.6, 20.0) | 67 (1, 89) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-4.4, 4.3) |
| Greene County 6 | Rural | 14.5 (8.6, 23.4) | 27 (1, 89) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-5.5, 5.4) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 10.1 (9.3, 11.0) | 86 (65, 88) | 111 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.8, 0.9) |
| Pender County 6 | Urban | 14.6 (10.9, 19.2) | 25 (1, 86) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-4.3, 3.5) |
| Lee County 6 | Rural | 13.2 (9.8, 17.6) | 52 (3, 89) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-4.0, 3.2) |
| Chatham County 6 | Urban | 11.4 (8.7, 14.9) | 75 (13, 89) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.4, 2.3) |
| Granville County 6 | Rural | 14.2 (10.6, 18.8) | 33 (2, 87) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.3, 2.0) |
| Moore County 6 | Urban | 13.5 (10.9, 16.7) | 47 (5, 86) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.4, 2.1) |
| Ashe County 6 | Rural | 11.7 (7.2, 18.5) | 74 (2, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-6.9, 5.6) |
| Franklin County 6 | Urban | 11.2 (8.2, 14.9) | 78 (11, 89) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.3, 3.1) |
| Johnston County 6 | Urban | 11.9 (9.9, 14.1) | 72 (20, 87) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.7, 2.6) |
| Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 15.4 (11.6, 20.2) | 17 (1, 85) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-4.1, 2.6) |
| Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 10.6 (7.2, 15.5) | 82 (10, 89) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-5.7, 3.1) |
| Wilson County 6 | Rural | 13.0 (10.0, 16.6) | 57 (5, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.3, 0.8) |
| Caswell County 6 | Rural | 14.4 (9.2, 21.9) | 30 (1, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-7.6, 3.7) |
| Vance County 6 | Rural | 8.2 (5.2, 12.6) | 89 (35, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-7.0, 1.8) |
| Pitt County 6 | Urban | 11.2 (9.1, 13.7) | 76 (24, 88) | 21 |
falling 
|
-3.5 (-12.6, -1.2) |
| Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 15.1 (10.5, 21.6) | 21 (1, 88) | 9 |
stable
|
-3.6 (-25.5, 3.5) |
| Hoke County 6 | Urban | 9.8 (6.3, 14.6) | 88 (12, 89) | 5 |
stable
|
-4.0 (-8.4, 0.3) |
| Person County 6 | Urban | 12.2 (8.4, 17.4) | 69 (3, 89) | 8 |
falling
|
-6.2 (-32.6, -0.7) |
| Bladen County 6 | Rural | 13.6 (8.8, 20.3) | 46 (1, 89) | 6 |
stable
|
-36.9 (-60.8, 1.5) |
| Anson County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (11.3, 27.1) | 3 (1, 89) | 5 |
|
|
| Bertie County 6 | Rural | 12.1 (6.8, 20.5) | 70 (1, 89) | 3 |
|
|
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 10.0 (5.9, 16.5) | 87 (5, 89) | 4 |
|
|
| Mitchell County 6 | Rural | 12.9 (6.9, 22.8) | 59 (1, 89) | 3 |
|
|
| Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 16.1 (8.5, 28.9) | 13 (1, 89) | 3 |
|
|
| Perquimans County 6 | Rural | 16.8 (9.5, 28.6) | 7 (1, 89) | 4 |
|
|
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 13.6 (8.1, 22.3) | 45 (1, 89) | 5 |
|
|
| Scotland County 6 | Rural | 16.5 (11.2, 23.5) | 12 (1, 88) | 7 |
|
|
| Yancey County 6 | Rural | 11.1 (6.2, 19.0) | 80 (2, 89) | 3 |
|
|
| Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Chowan County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clay County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hertford County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jones County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/16/2024 4:19 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/16/2024 4:19 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.