Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 8.7 (8.5, 8.9) N/A 1,146 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Duplin County 6 4.8 (2.9, 7.5) 78 (42, 78) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.3, 6.7)
Surry County 6 5.5 (3.6, 8.2) 77 (31, 78) 6 stable stable trend -18.7 (-35.5, 2.6)
Transylvania County 6 5.6 (3.1, 10.0) 76 (18, 78) 4
*
*
Brunswick County 6 5.7 (4.4, 7.5) 75 (49, 78) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 6.3)
Chatham County 6 6.1 (4.4, 8.6) 74 (29, 78) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.1, 9.2)
Beaufort County 6 6.2 (3.8, 9.7) 73 (21, 78) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-4.6, 10.3)
Davie County 6 6.3 (3.7, 10.1) 72 (12, 78) 4
*
*
Richmond County 6 6.5 (3.8, 10.5) 71 (12, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 5.8)
Watauga County 6 6.5 (4.0, 10.3) 70 (13, 78) 4 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.1, 9.2)
Alexander County 6 6.7 (4.1, 10.8) 69 (11, 78) 4
*
*
Orange County 6 6.7 (5.1, 8.8) 68 (25, 78) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.8, 6.6)
Cherokee County 6 7.0 (4.2, 11.7) 67 (9, 78) 4
*
*
Moore County 6 7.0 (5.3, 9.2) 66 (22, 78) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.8, 5.7)
Pitt County 6 7.0 (5.4, 8.9) 65 (25, 77) 14 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.3, 6.1)
Franklin County 6 7.2 (4.9, 10.4) 64 (13, 78) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.8, 6.4)
Henderson County 6 7.4 (5.6, 9.5) 63 (20, 77) 14 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.1, 6.4)
Pender County 6 7.6 (5.2, 10.8) 62 (11, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.7, 6.6)
Wilkes County 6 7.6 (5.4, 10.5) 61 (13, 78) 8 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.2, 8.5)
Edgecombe County 6 7.6 (5.1, 11.1) 60 (9, 78) 6 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.0, 6.9)
Wake County 6 7.7 (7.0, 8.5) 59 (35, 70) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.8, 6.3)
Union County 6 7.8 (6.3, 9.5) 58 (21, 75) 20 rising rising trend 6.2 (3.6, 8.9)
Robeson County 6 7.8 (6.0, 10.1) 57 (16, 77) 12 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.4, 8.3)
Craven County 6 7.9 (6.0, 10.4) 56 (13, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.1)
Montgomery County 6 8.0 (4.6, 13.4) 55 (4, 78) 3
*
*
Cumberland County 6 8.0 (6.7, 9.5) 54 (21, 72) 28 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.7)
Johnston County 6 8.0 (6.4, 9.9) 53 (17, 74) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.0)
Catawba County 6 8.1 (6.5, 10.0) 52 (17, 74) 18 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.1, 9.2)
Person County 6 8.1 (5.0, 12.5) 51 (4, 78) 5 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.9, 10.0)
Forsyth County 6 8.2 (7.1, 9.5) 50 (21, 70) 40 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.0)
Guilford County 6 8.3 (7.3, 9.4) 49 (24, 68) 53 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Cabarrus County 6 8.4 (6.7, 10.2) 48 (15, 74) 19 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 6.4)
Caldwell County 6 8.5 (6.3, 11.3) 47 (9, 76) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.0, 5.9)
Lenoir County 6 8.5 (5.9, 12.1) 46 (6, 77) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.9, 8.1)
Dare County 6 8.6 (5.5, 13.1) 45 (4, 78) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.2)
Mecklenburg County 6 8.6 (7.8, 9.5) 44 (24, 62) 94 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.4, 5.6)
Davidson County 6 8.8 (7.2, 10.7) 43 (12, 71) 21 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.1, 8.8)
Sampson County 6 8.8 (6.1, 12.3) 42 (5, 77) 7 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.6, 11.6)
Rutherford County 6 8.8 (6.4, 11.9) 41 (6, 76) 10
*
*
Iredell County 6 8.8 (7.1, 10.8) 40 (12, 71) 20 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.1, 6.7)
Yadkin County 6 8.9 (5.6, 13.7) 39 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 5.4 (-0.3, 11.4)
New Hanover County 6 9.0 (7.5, 10.7) 38 (13, 68) 27 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.2, 6.1)
Columbus County 6 9.1 (6.3, 12.8) 37 (5, 77) 7
*
*
Onslow County 6 9.2 (7.1, 11.7) 36 (7, 72) 13 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 4.9)
Carteret County 6 9.4 (7.0, 12.6) 35 (5, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.2)
Harnett County 6 9.4 (7.3, 12.0) 34 (6, 72) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.1)
Durham County 6 9.5 (8.1, 11.2) 33 (10, 62) 32 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 5.5)
Yancey County 6 9.6 (5.4, 16.8) 32 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Rowan County 6 9.7 (7.7, 12.0) 31 (7, 68) 18 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.5, 6.9)
Nash County 6 9.7 (7.4, 12.6) 30 (5, 71) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.1)
Rockingham County 6 9.8 (7.6, 12.6) 29 (4, 70) 14 stable stable trend -13.1 (-27.4, 4.1)
Warren County 6 10.0 (5.7, 17.1) 28 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Ashe County 6 10.0 (6.5, 15.5) 27 (2, 77) 5
*
*
Wilson County 6 10.1 (7.6, 13.2) 26 (3, 71) 12 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 6.4)
Randolph County 6 10.1 (8.2, 12.4) 25 (5, 63) 20 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.3, 8.8)
Lincoln County 6 10.1 (7.6, 13.3) 24 (4, 72) 11 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.7, 8.9)
Cleveland County 6 10.1 (7.9, 12.9) 23 (5, 70) 14 rising rising trend 8.1 (4.0, 12.4)
Jackson County 6 10.1 (6.7, 14.9) 22 (2, 76) 6 stable stable trend 5.4 (-0.1, 11.2)
Alamance County 6 10.2 (8.4, 12.4) 21 (6, 62) 22 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.8, 7.0)
Wayne County 6 10.2 (8.1, 12.8) 20 (4, 65) 16 rising rising trend 6.6 (3.6, 9.7)
Buncombe County 6 10.5 (9.1, 12.2) 19 (6, 50) 40 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.2, 6.3)
Stokes County 6 10.5 (7.4, 14.8) 18 (2, 75) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.5, 11.2)
Caswell County 6 10.5 (6.4, 17.1) 17 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Bladen County 6 10.6 (6.9, 15.9) 16 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Northampton County 6 10.7 (6.3, 18.0) 15 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 10.8 (7.3, 15.9) 14 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend -8.3 (-33.5, 26.6)
Halifax County 6 11.0 (7.7, 15.2) 13 (1, 72) 8 rising rising trend 12.8 (9.0, 16.7)
Anson County 6 11.4 (6.7, 18.3) 12 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Burke County 6 11.8 (9.3, 14.9) 11 (2, 55) 16 rising rising trend 8.2 (5.4, 11.0)
McDowell County 6 12.5 (9.1, 17.0) 10 (1, 61) 9
*
*
Stanly County 6 12.5 (9.3, 16.5) 9 (1, 57) 11 rising rising trend 8.3 (4.4, 12.3)
Haywood County 6 12.7 (9.6, 16.5) 8 (1, 55) 13 rising rising trend 8.4 (5.4, 11.4)
Lee County 6 12.7 (9.3, 17.1) 7 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 5.8)
Gaston County 6 13.1 (11.3, 15.2) 6 (2, 26) 38 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.0)
Vance County 6 13.5 (9.6, 18.5) 5 (1, 60) 8 rising rising trend 8.3 (4.7, 12.1)
Greene County 6 14.0 (8.6, 22.1) 4 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Scotland County 6 14.5 (10.1, 20.4) 3 (1, 62) 7
*
*
Pamlico County 6 16.1 (8.4, 29.0) 2 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Granville County 6 17.4 (13.7, 22.0) 1 (1, 15) 15 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.3, 9.8)
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 8:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top