Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 *** 119.3 (118.1, 120.6) N/A 7,140 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Tyrrell County 6 *** 170.8 (108.7, 258.6) 1 (1, 99) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.0, 8.3)
Jones County 6 *** 163.8 (124.3, 214.1) 2 (1, 74) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.2)
Anson County 6 *** 160.4 (133.2, 191.9) 3 (1, 54) 26 rising rising trend 17.3 (1.0, 36.1)
Halifax County 6 *** 145.7 (128.2, 165.3) 4 (1, 41) 52 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 143.6 (138.6, 148.8) 5 (1, 14) 667 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Pasquotank County 6 *** 141.8 (120.6, 165.9) 6 (1, 58) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Lenoir County 6 *** 140.5 (123.6, 159.2) 7 (1, 50) 53 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.1)
Wake County 6 *** 139.2 (134.3, 144.3) 8 (3, 20) 669 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.0, 8.8)
Bertie County 6 *** 138.0 (111.4, 169.8) 9 (1, 89) 20 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Craven County 6 *** 137.6 (125.0, 151.2) 10 (2, 39) 91 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.3)
Guilford County 6 *** 136.2 (130.1, 142.6) 11 (3, 24) 392 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Sampson County 6 *** 131.9 (116.0, 149.5) 12 (1, 63) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Union County 6 *** 131.7 (122.2, 141.7) 13 (3, 43) 156 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Caswell County 6 *** 130.2 (106.8, 157.9) 14 (1, 86) 23 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Lee County 6 *** 129.4 (112.9, 147.8) 15 (2, 71) 46 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.4)
Martin County 6 *** 128.9 (105.8, 156.5) 16 (1, 88) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.5, 7.0)
Cabarrus County 6 *** 128.4 (118.6, 138.7) 17 (4, 50) 136 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.5, 8.4)
Cumberland County 6 *** 128.3 (120.0, 137.1) 18 (6, 45) 186 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 128.1 (116.2, 140.8) 19 (4, 61) 90 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Moore County 6 *** 127.1 (115.7, 139.5) 20 (4, 61) 94 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Franklin County 6 *** 124.4 (109.1, 141.3) 21 (3, 77) 52 rising rising trend 12.3 (0.1, 26.0)
Durham County 6 *** 122.5 (114.3, 131.1) 22 (10, 59) 180 stable stable trend 6.3 (-5.4, 19.4)
Iredell County 6 *** 122.2 (112.6, 132.4) 23 (9, 64) 128 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.7, -2.0)
Hoke County 6 *** 122.2 (101.4, 145.9) 24 (2, 93) 27 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.3)
Camden County 6 *** 121.3 (86.3, 167.3) 25 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.7, 0.7)
Johnston County 6 *** 120.9 (111.0, 131.5) 26 (9, 68) 122 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Northampton County 6 *** 120.3 (97.4, 148.1) 27 (1, 95) 20 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.7, -3.4)
Avery County 6 *** 120.2 (95.5, 150.6) 28 (1, 97) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Catawba County 6 *** 120.0 (110.5, 130.2) 29 (10, 68) 124 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Edgecombe County 6 *** 120.0 (104.0, 138.0) 30 (4, 85) 43 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -1.7)
Randolph County 6 *** 119.4 (109.4, 130.2) 31 (11, 71) 110 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Rowan County 6 *** 119.0 (108.8, 129.9) 32 (10, 73) 107 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.5)
Pamlico County 6 *** 118.5 (92.2, 152.6) 33 (1, 98) 15 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -2.0)
Forsyth County 6 *** 118.1 (111.5, 125.0) 34 (16, 61) 250 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.2, -3.4)
Rockingham County 6 *** 117.9 (106.2, 130.6) 35 (8, 78) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Chowan County 6 *** 117.0 (90.0, 151.2) 36 (1, 99) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.4)
Wilson County 6 *** 116.5 (103.3, 131.1) 37 (8, 85) 60 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
Onslow County 6 *** 116.1 (104.5, 128.5) 38 (10, 82) 77 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Granville County 6 *** 115.9 (100.8, 132.9) 39 (7, 87) 45 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.9, -2.4)
Columbus County 6 *** 115.6 (100.6, 132.4) 40 (5, 87) 45 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.4)
Pender County 6 *** 115.5 (100.5, 132.3) 41 (7, 89) 46 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Dare County 6 *** 115.4 (97.9, 135.6) 42 (5, 91) 34 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.2)
Chatham County 6 *** 114.8 (102.3, 128.7) 43 (10, 85) 64 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.8)
Harnett County 6 *** 114.7 (102.9, 127.5) 44 (11, 84) 73 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Hertford County 6 *** 114.4 (92.0, 141.2) 45 (3, 97) 19 falling falling trend -10.5 (-15.6, -5.2)
Robeson County 6 *** 114.2 (103.3, 126.0) 46 (14, 81) 86 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.4, -3.4)
Lincoln County 6 *** 113.7 (101.3, 127.4) 47 (11, 87) 65 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Swain County 6 *** 113.4 (84.9, 149.4) 48 (1, 99) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 4.5)
Warren County 6 *** 113.2 (91.5, 139.8) 49 (4, 97) 20 stable stable trend -2.5 (-8.2, 3.7)
Washington County 6 *** 111.6 (83.6, 148.3) 50 (2, 99) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.3)
Rutherford County 6 *** 111.2 (98.1, 125.9) 51 (13, 91) 55 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Polk County 6 *** 110.7 (90.5, 135.7) 52 (4, 98) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Pitt County 6 *** 110.5 (100.1, 121.7) 53 (19, 87) 90 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.9, -3.0)
Alamance County 6 *** 110.3 (101.0, 120.4) 54 (20, 84) 106 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Cleveland County 6 *** 110.1 (98.6, 122.7) 55 (16, 89) 71 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.7, -2.8)
Scotland County 6 *** 109.6 (90.4, 132.1) 56 (5, 97) 24 falling falling trend -11.0 (-15.5, -6.3)
Haywood County 6 *** 109.0 (96.3, 123.3) 57 (13, 92) 55 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Perquimans County 6 *** 109.0 (83.7, 141.7) 58 (2, 99) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.2)
Alleghany County 6 *** 108.7 (81.3, 145.2) 59 (2, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.2)
Alexander County 6 *** 108.7 (91.4, 128.7) 60 (9, 97) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)
Henderson County 6 *** 107.8 (98.5, 117.9) 61 (26, 87) 102 stable stable trend 2.5 (-5.7, 11.5)
Gaston County 6 *** 106.1 (98.1, 114.7) 62 (31, 88) 138 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.0, -2.9)
Nash County 6 *** 106.1 (94.6, 118.8) 63 (22, 93) 66 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Stanly County 6 *** 105.4 (91.6, 120.9) 64 (16, 96) 44 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Hyde County 6 *** 105.3 (63.4, 167.9) 65 (1, 100) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.4, 2.5)
Brunswick County 6 *** 104.9 (96.7, 113.8) 66 (35, 90) 142 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Macon County 6 *** 104.9 (89.1, 123.4) 67 (13, 98) 33 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.1)
Person County 6 *** 104.3 (87.6, 123.7) 68 (13, 98) 29 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.7, -2.3)
Cherokee County 6 *** 103.4 (86.1, 124.2) 69 (12, 98) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.5)
Ashe County 6 *** 103.4 (85.2, 125.2) 70 (10, 99) 24 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.2, -1.1)
Surry County 6 *** 103.1 (90.8, 116.8) 71 (22, 95) 53 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.2)
Duplin County 6 *** 103.1 (88.8, 119.2) 72 (18, 97) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.8)
Bladen County 6 *** 102.8 (85.3, 123.4) 73 (13, 99) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.2)
Buncombe County 6 *** 102.5 (95.6, 109.7) 74 (42, 89) 174 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.1, -4.0)
Richmond County 6 *** 102.1 (85.7, 121.1) 75 (15, 98) 29 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.0)
Greene County 6 *** 101.9 (78.2, 131.0) 76 (5, 100) 14 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.3, -2.5)
Transylvania County 6 *** 101.8 (86.8, 119.6) 77 (16, 98) 34 stable stable trend 5.0 (-3.0, 13.7)
Orange County 6 *** 101.3 (90.8, 112.6) 78 (34, 95) 76 stable stable trend 7.9 (-8.3, 27.1)
Vance County 6 *** 101.1 (84.5, 120.4) 79 (15, 99) 28 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.6, -3.3)
New Hanover County 6 *** 99.6 (92.1, 107.6) 80 (48, 92) 136 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.3)
Davidson County 6 *** 99.1 (90.7, 108.1) 81 (44, 95) 109 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.5, -1.9)
Burke County 6 *** 97.9 (87.2, 109.6) 82 (36, 98) 63 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.5, -3.0)
Stokes County 6 *** 96.3 (82.0, 112.8) 83 (31, 99) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Watauga County 6 *** 96.3 (81.4, 113.5) 84 (27, 99) 31 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.8, -0.2)
Clay County 6 *** 96.3 (70.5, 131.6) 85 (5, 100) 10 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.1, 0.7)
Montgomery County 6 *** 96.1 (77.0, 119.0) 86 (17, 100) 19 falling falling trend -9.6 (-16.0, -2.6)
Currituck County 6 *** 95.3 (75.6, 119.2) 87 (15, 100) 17 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -0.8)
Beaufort County 6 *** 94.0 (80.1, 110.1) 88 (35, 99) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-13.6, 16.1)
Madison County 6 *** 93.1 (73.3, 117.7) 89 (17, 100) 16 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.1)
McDowell County 6 *** 91.8 (77.3, 108.6) 90 (36, 100) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.2)
Caldwell County 6 *** 90.0 (79.2, 102.0) 91 (55, 99) 53 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.7)
Wilkes County 6 *** 89.9 (78.6, 102.8) 92 (50, 99) 47 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.1, -2.2)
Carteret County 6 *** 89.9 (79.2, 101.9) 93 (56, 99) 54 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.6, -4.4)
Davie County 6 *** 88.6 (74.2, 105.3) 94 (43, 100) 28 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.5)
Mitchell County 6 *** 88.1 (66.7, 116.0) 95 (16, 100) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.0)
Jackson County 6 *** 82.3 (67.7, 99.5) 96 (57, 100) 24 falling falling trend -7.8 (-11.3, -4.2)
Yadkin County 6 *** 78.7 (64.1, 96.1) 97 (62, 100) 21 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.4, -1.5)
Yancey County 6 *** 78.5 (59.4, 103.2) 98 (46, 100) 12 stable stable trend 8.5 (-5.7, 24.9)
Gates County 6 *** 77.0 (53.2, 110.0) 99 (26, 100) 7 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.8, -1.7)
Graham County 6 *** 56.0 (33.8, 90.7) 100 (68, 100) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.7, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 3:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top