Incidence Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | N/A | 18.8 (18.4, 19.1) | N/A | 2,387 |
rising 
|
0.9 (0.5, 1.2) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) | N/A | 67,373 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Jones County 6 | Rural | 27.3 (15.0, 46.4) | 1 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| McDowell County 6 | Rural | 26.3 (20.6, 33.2) | 2 (1, 69) | 16 |
rising
|
3.2 (0.1, 6.9) |
| Wayne County 6 | Urban | 25.2 (21.5, 29.3) | 3 (1, 53) | 35 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.7, 6.9) |
| Chowan County 6 | Rural | 25.0 (15.4, 38.9) | 4 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable 
|
2.7 (-2.3, 8.3) |
| Robeson County 6 | Rural | 24.8 (21.0, 29.0) | 5 (1, 56) | 33 |
rising
|
3.3 (1.3, 5.6) |
| Columbus County 6 | Rural | 24.6 (19.3, 31.0) | 6 (1, 78) | 17 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.6, 7.8) |
| Granville County 6 | Rural | 24.2 (19.4, 29.8) | 7 (1, 74) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.5, 2.8) |
| Onslow County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (20.7, 27.9) | 8 (1, 60) | 38 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.9, 4.6) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (21.2, 27.3) | 9 (1, 51) | 55 |
rising
|
2.4 (0.8, 4.2) |
| Davie County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (18.5, 30.5) | 10 (1, 82) | 15 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.7, 5.2) |
| Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (20.0, 28.3) | 11 (1, 70) | 30 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.7, 3.4) |
| Randolph County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (20.6, 27.2) | 12 (1, 58) | 45 |
rising
|
3.0 (1.4, 5.0) |
| Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 23.5 (19.6, 28.2) | 13 (1, 70) | 27 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.5, 4.4) |
| Burke County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (19.4, 27.7) | 14 (1, 74) | 29 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.3, 4.9) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (18.1, 29.5) | 15 (1, 82) | 16 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.8, 3.7) |
| Clay County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (13.2, 39.0) | 16 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (18.2, 29.1) | 17 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 3.7) |
| Surry County 6 | Rural | 23.0 (18.9, 27.9) | 18 (1, 77) | 23 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.1, 3.9) |
| Pender County 6 | Urban | 22.9 (18.3, 28.5) | 19 (1, 80) | 18 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.1, 4.1) |
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 22.8 (15.0, 33.6) | 20 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Montgomery County 6 | Rural | 22.7 (16.0, 31.5) | 21 (1, 88) | 8 |
stable
|
3.2 (-0.7, 7.8) |
| Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (18.9, 26.8) | 22 (1, 74) | 30 |
stable
|
-11.4 (-29.9, 5.6) |
| Stanly County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (17.9, 28.0) | 23 (1, 81) | 18 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.0, 3.9) |
| Scotland County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (16.5, 30.1) | 24 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
1.3 (-3.1, 6.4) |
| Bladen County 6 | Rural | 22.4 (16.2, 30.5) | 25 (1, 88) | 10 |
rising
|
4.1 (0.4, 8.8) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (18.0, 27.5) | 26 (1, 82) | 21 |
rising
|
3.5 (1.9, 5.3) |
| Northampton County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (13.6, 34.6) | 27 (1, 90) | 5 |
rising
|
14.0 (1.9, 42.5) |
| Anson County 6 | Urban | 21.8 (14.4, 31.7) | 28 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 21.7 (12.3, 36.5) | 29 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Orange County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.3, 25.1) | 30 (4, 76) | 35 |
rising
|
12.5 (1.9, 33.9) |
| Alamance County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.7, 24.6) | 31 (5, 69) | 46 |
rising
|
2.6 (0.7, 4.9) |
| Hoke County 6 | Urban | 21.2 (15.6, 28.1) | 32 (1, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.3, 4.9) |
| Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 21.1 (15.6, 28.1) | 33 (1, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.9, 3.5) |
| Duplin County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (16.2, 27.0) | 34 (1, 86) | 14 |
stable
|
1.9 (-2.5, 7.0) |
| Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (15.9, 27.2) | 35 (1, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.0, 5.4) |
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (13.3, 31.8) | 36 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (13.9, 30.3) | 37 (1, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.3, 5.0) |
| Rowan County 6 | Urban | 20.8 (17.9, 24.0) | 38 (7, 77) | 40 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 2.9) |
| Person County 6 | Urban | 20.6 (15.6, 26.9) | 39 (1, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.8, 2.3) |
| Sampson County 6 | Rural | 20.6 (16.1, 25.9) | 40 (2, 87) | 16 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.4, 6.3) |
| Wilson County 6 | Rural | 20.5 (16.7, 24.9) | 41 (3, 85) | 22 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.3, 5.0) |
| Halifax County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.7, 26.1) | 42 (2, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.2, 6.0) |
| Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (17.4, 23.7) | 43 (8, 80) | 50 |
rising
|
2.1 (0.6, 4.0) |
| Richmond County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.3, 26.5) | 44 (2, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
2.6 (-1.1, 6.9) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (16.6, 24.6) | 45 (5, 84) | 23 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.7, 2.4) |
| Carteret County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (16.2, 25.1) | 46 (3, 86) | 22 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.7, 4.7) |
| Gaston County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (17.9, 22.8) | 47 (12, 75) | 56 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.9, 2.8) |
| Watauga County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (15.1, 26.7) | 48 (1, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
1.9 (-3.0, 7.9) |
| Franklin County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (16.0, 25.1) | 49 (3, 87) | 18 |
rising
|
4.3 (1.0, 8.8) |
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 20.0 (15.8, 25.1) | 50 (3, 87) | 19 |
stable
|
3.0 (0.0, 6.5) |
| Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 20.0 (18.1, 22.0) | 51 (19, 73) | 92 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.2, 2.1) |
| Bertie County 6 | Rural | 19.9 (12.3, 31.0) | 52 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.5, 5.3) |
| Harnett County 6 | Rural | 19.6 (16.4, 23.2) | 53 (9, 85) | 27 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.9, 5.0) |
| Lee County 6 | Rural | 19.3 (15.1, 24.5) | 54 (4, 88) | 15 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.2, 5.2) |
| Vance County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (14.1, 25.5) | 55 (2, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.4, 1.8) |
| Greene County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (12.3, 28.7) | 56 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
1.6 (-2.6, 6.6) |
| Catawba County 6 | Urban | 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) | 57 (15, 84) | 39 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.1) |
| Craven County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (15.7, 22.9) | 58 (11, 86) | 25 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.1, 3.9) |
| Hertford County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (12.3, 28.3) | 59 (1, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.5 (-3.2, 4.2) |
| Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 18.9 (12.7, 27.2) | 60 (1, 90) | 8 |
rising
|
5.2 (1.0, 10.4) |
| New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (16.5, 21.2) | 61 (25, 84) | 54 |
stable
|
-6.0 (-13.4, 1.7) |
| Stokes County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (14.1, 24.5) | 62 (3, 89) | 13 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 4.0) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 18.4 (16.0, 21.0) | 63 (23, 85) | 45 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.2, 1.3) |
| Chatham County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (14.8, 22.4) | 64 (13, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.2, 3.9) |
| Moore County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (15.0, 22.0) | 65 (15, 88) | 26 |
stable
|
1.7 (-1.1, 4.9) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 18.1 (16.1, 20.4) | 66 (31, 85) | 60 |
rising
|
2.2 (0.8, 3.7) |
| Guilford County 6 | Urban | 18.0 (16.5, 19.6) | 67 (38, 82) | 112 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.9, 2.1) |
| Johnston County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.6) | 68 (25, 86) | 43 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 3.2) |
| Avery County 6 | Rural | 17.9 (11.1, 28.0) | 69 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Union County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.4) | 70 (28, 87) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.6) |
| Swain County 6 | Rural | 17.8 (10.7, 28.8) | 71 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Iredell County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (15.4, 20.5) | 72 (28, 86) | 41 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.3, 3.3) |
| Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 17.7 (13.7, 22.4) | 73 (10, 89) | 16 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.7, 2.8) |
| Nash County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (14.3, 21.5) | 74 (19, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.5, 3.8) |
| Caswell County 6 | Rural | 17.5 (11.2, 26.3) | 75 (2, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.3 (-4.6, 5.8) |
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 17.4 (10.8, 27.0) | 76 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (12.3, 23.5) | 77 (6, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.1, 8.9) |
| Pitt County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (14.4, 20.1) | 78 (28, 88) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.9, 0.9) |
| Durham County 6 | Urban | 16.8 (14.8, 18.9) | 79 (42, 87) | 57 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (11.5, 23.7) | 80 (4, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
5.1 (1.9, 8.9) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 16.4 (15.3, 17.6) | 81 (57, 86) | 177 |
stable
|
0.0 (-5.5, 1.4) |
| Macon County 6 | Rural | 16.3 (11.6, 22.5) | 82 (8, 90) | 10 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.1, 6.1) |
| Wake County 6 | Urban | 15.9 (14.9, 17.0) | 83 (64, 87) | 181 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.3) |
| Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 15.8 (14.0, 17.8) | 84 (53, 88) | 59 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.1, 2.6) |
| Alexander County 6 | Urban | 15.4 (10.7, 21.6) | 85 (10, 90) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-6.3, 2.9) |
| Henderson County 6 | Urban | 15.2 (12.6, 18.2) | 86 (45, 90) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.2, 1.2) |
| Ashe County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (9.5, 20.6) | 87 (25, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-5.4, 1.3) |
| Yancey County 6 | Rural | 13.9 (7.9, 23.2) | 88 (5, 90) | 4 |
stable
|
4.1 (-2.2, 11.8) |
| Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 12.0 (8.1, 17.4) | 89 (47, 90) | 6 |
falling
|
-23.2 (-51.3, -2.4) |
| Dare County 6 | Rural | 10.7 (7.1, 15.7) | 90 (64, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.4, 4.3) |
| Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currituck County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitchell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perquimans County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 6:19 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 6:19 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.