Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 *** 240.1 (238.8, 241.5) N/A 25,181 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Granville County 6 *** 301.7 (282.5, 321.9) 1 (1, 12) 201 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Pamlico County 6 *** 299.0 (256.1, 347.9) 2 (1, 74) 45 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Onslow County 6 *** 282.6 (269.5, 296.1) 3 (1, 20) 376 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.0)
Tyrrell County 6 *** 278.1 (210.9, 362.0) 4 (1, 99) 13 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.3, 8.4)
Swain County 6 *** 276.8 (238.8, 319.4) 5 (1, 88) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Vance County 6 *** 273.9 (251.8, 297.4) 6 (1, 59) 127 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Jones County 6 *** 273.8 (229.6, 325.1) 7 (1, 93) 33 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Alexander County 6 *** 272.4 (249.1, 297.4) 8 (1, 64) 110 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 2.9)
Person County 6 *** 270.8 (248.1, 295.3) 9 (1, 66) 119 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Cleveland County 6 *** 268.9 (254.3, 284.3) 10 (2, 49) 279 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 1.9)
Halifax County 6 *** 268.0 (248.2, 289.2) 11 (1, 65) 155 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Davie County 6 *** 267.4 (245.6, 290.8) 12 (1, 69) 126 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Lenoir County 6 *** 266.5 (247.7, 286.5) 13 (2, 63) 170 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.1)
Yancey County 6 *** 264.5 (230.8, 302.3) 14 (1, 91) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
Clay County 6 *** 262.4 (217.9, 314.4) 15 (1, 97) 31 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.3)
Rockingham County 6 *** 261.9 (247.4, 277.1) 16 (3, 57) 279 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Haywood County 6 *** 261.5 (243.1, 281.0) 17 (3, 70) 174 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Randolph County 6 *** 261.1 (249.4, 273.2) 18 (5, 52) 406 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.1)
Wayne County 6 *** 258.9 (246.0, 272.4) 19 (4, 60) 327 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.7)
McDowell County 6 *** 258.8 (238.1, 280.9) 20 (2, 78) 130 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Stokes County 6 *** 256.7 (236.5, 278.3) 21 (2, 82) 136 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Bertie County 6 *** 256.0 (225.6, 289.8) 22 (1, 91) 59 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Davidson County 6 *** 255.6 (244.8, 266.8) 23 (7, 62) 461 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Alamance County 6 *** 255.4 (244.4, 266.9) 24 (6, 62) 429 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Caswell County 6 *** 255.2 (227.2, 286.1) 25 (1, 92) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Bladen County 6 *** 255.0 (231.1, 280.9) 26 (2, 88) 96 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Stanly County 6 *** 254.9 (237.0, 273.9) 27 (4, 80) 164 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Edgecombe County 6 *** 254.6 (235.5, 274.9) 28 (3, 80) 152 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Cherokee County 6 *** 254.6 (227.8, 284.0) 29 (2, 91) 82 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Rowan County 6 *** 254.5 (242.8, 266.6) 30 (7, 63) 389 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Surry County 6 *** 253.6 (237.5, 270.5) 31 (4, 76) 204 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Anson County 6 *** 252.9 (226.0, 282.4) 32 (1, 91) 70 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.3)
Carteret County 6 *** 252.4 (235.6, 270.2) 33 (4, 80) 203 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Mitchell County 6 *** 252.1 (217.3, 291.5) 34 (1, 94) 44 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Gaston County 6 *** 251.6 (242.3, 261.3) 35 (11, 64) 581 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Craven County 6 *** 251.6 (237.0, 266.8) 36 (7, 77) 248 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Catawba County 6 *** 251.5 (240.5, 262.9) 37 (9, 67) 427 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Caldwell County 6 *** 250.9 (236.0, 266.7) 38 (7, 81) 232 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Johnston County 6 *** 249.5 (239.6, 259.7) 39 (13, 69) 495 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.4, 6.4)
Sampson County 6 *** 249.4 (232.0, 267.9) 40 (6, 83) 165 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Lincoln County 6 *** 247.9 (233.1, 263.5) 41 (8, 81) 230 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Brunswick County 6 *** 247.4 (234.5, 261.0) 42 (10, 77) 361 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Iredell County 6 *** 246.9 (236.6, 257.7) 43 (14, 74) 455 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Warren County 6 *** 246.2 (215.2, 280.9) 44 (1, 94) 56 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Scotland County 6 *** 246.0 (222.9, 270.9) 45 (3, 91) 91 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Burke County 6 *** 245.8 (231.6, 260.8) 46 (10, 82) 248 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Franklin County 6 *** 245.2 (228.8, 262.5) 47 (8, 87) 182 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Lee County 6 *** 243.9 (226.3, 262.5) 48 (7, 88) 153 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Pasquotank County 6 *** 242.5 (220.7, 266.0) 49 (5, 92) 99 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Guilford County 6 *** 241.9 (235.9, 248.1) 50 (30, 72) 1,285 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Moore County 6 *** 241.8 (227.3, 257.0) 51 (13, 86) 232 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Buncombe County 6 *** 241.7 (233.1, 250.4) 52 (23, 77) 664 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Rutherford County 6 *** 241.6 (225.1, 259.1) 53 (9, 90) 180 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Chatham County 6 *** 240.6 (224.2, 258.0) 54 (11, 90) 184 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Cumberland County 6 *** 240.4 (232.3, 248.7) 55 (27, 77) 706 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Pender County 6 *** 239.6 (222.4, 258.0) 56 (12, 91) 158 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Richmond County 6 *** 239.6 (219.4, 261.1) 57 (8, 92) 114 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
New Hanover County 6 *** 238.1 (228.9, 247.7) 58 (30, 83) 536 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Cabarrus County 6 *** 237.6 (228.1, 247.4) 59 (30, 83) 483 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.6)
Nash County 6 *** 237.5 (223.7, 251.9) 60 (20, 89) 246 stable stable trend -5.3 (-14.7, 5.0)
Hoke County 6 *** 237.3 (218.0, 257.8) 61 (9, 93) 115 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Forsyth County 6 *** 236.0 (229.0, 243.2) 62 (38, 82) 911 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 235.9 (210.5, 263.8) 63 (5, 96) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Harnett County 6 *** 235.4 (223.2, 248.1) 64 (24, 88) 286 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Union County 6 *** 235.3 (226.4, 244.5) 65 (34, 85) 543 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Dare County 6 *** 233.9 (212.4, 257.2) 66 (10, 94) 104 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Avery County 6 *** 233.7 (203.3, 267.8) 67 (3, 97) 46 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Northampton County 6 *** 233.3 (203.6, 266.6) 68 (4, 97) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Greene County 6 *** 232.3 (204.6, 263.0) 69 (5, 97) 55 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Polk County 6 *** 232.0 (202.2, 265.6) 70 (4, 97) 55 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.5)
Hertford County 6 *** 231.9 (204.9, 261.6) 71 (6, 97) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Orange County 6 *** 230.2 (218.7, 242.2) 72 (39, 91) 322 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Ashe County 6 *** 229.8 (204.0, 258.3) 73 (8, 96) 69 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Martin County 6 *** 229.7 (203.2, 259.1) 74 (7, 97) 65 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Durham County 6 *** 229.6 (221.9, 237.6) 75 (47, 88) 687 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Wake County 6 *** 229.1 (225.0, 233.3) 76 (58, 85) 2,383 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Yadkin County 6 *** 228.0 (206.6, 251.2) 77 (12, 96) 93 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Duplin County 6 *** 227.4 (210.1, 245.8) 78 (26, 95) 140 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Wilson County 6 *** 227.1 (212.6, 242.4) 79 (30, 93) 201 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Columbus County 6 *** 226.8 (209.5, 245.4) 80 (25, 94) 138 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Henderson County 6 *** 224.6 (212.2, 237.6) 81 (42, 93) 279 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Pitt County 6 *** 224.3 (213.8, 235.2) 82 (50, 93) 361 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Robeson County 6 *** 224.2 (212.6, 236.3) 83 (48, 93) 301 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Macon County 6 *** 223.1 (200.1, 248.2) 84 (17, 97) 84 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 223.1 (219.0, 227.2) 85 (69, 90) 2,278 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Madison County 6 *** 222.3 (195.2, 252.6) 86 (9, 99) 55 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.3)
Beaufort County 6 *** 220.6 (201.7, 241.1) 87 (26, 97) 118 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.0)
Wilkes County 6 *** 217.9 (202.5, 234.2) 88 (45, 96) 168 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Washington County 6 *** 217.7 (180.9, 260.4) 89 (4, 100) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Transylvania County 6 *** 213.7 (190.7, 239.0) 90 (31, 100) 77 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 206.8 (186.3, 229.0) 91 (49, 99) 85 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Graham County 6 *** 206.7 (165.2, 256.5) 92 (5, 100) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.5)
Watauga County 6 *** 200.4 (181.4, 220.9) 93 (61, 100) 95 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Alleghany County 6 *** 193.8 (160.2, 233.6) 94 (29, 100) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Perquimans County 6 *** 192.4 (159.4, 230.9) 95 (20, 100) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Chowan County 6 *** 190.5 (159.5, 226.4) 96 (32, 100) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Currituck County 6 *** 185.7 (164.2, 209.6) 97 (78, 100) 59 falling falling trend -19.7 (-32.9, -3.8)
Gates County 6 *** 184.7 (150.3, 225.4) 98 (35, 100) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
Camden County 6 *** 179.5 (146.1, 219.1) 99 (58, 100) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.2)
Hyde County 6 *** 168.8 (125.9, 224.3) 100 (36, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2021 12:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top