Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 429.7 (427.5, 432.0) | N/A | 29,006 | stable | 0.2 (0.0, 0.4) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 416.4 (416.0, 416.8) | N/A | 835,074 | stable | 0.1 (0.0, 0.1) |
Bertie County 6 | 434.7 (384.0, 490.9) | 48 (1, 95) | 66 | stable | 7.3 (-0.2, 16.7) |
Lenoir County 6 | 473.5 (442.5, 506.2) | 6 (1, 59) | 199 | rising | 4.3 (0.5, 7.3) |
Robeson County 6 | 402.4 (382.5, 423.1) | 74 (44, 91) | 327 | rising | 3.7 (0.6, 8.3) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 512.5 (380.2, 678.4) | 1 (1, 98) | 13 | stable | 2.9 (-1.7, 8.3) |
Anson County 6 | 447.8 (401.0, 499.0) | 26 (1, 87) | 75 | stable | 2.2 (-0.1, 4.8) |
Cleveland County 6 | 468.2 (444.7, 492.6) | 9 (1, 54) | 328 | rising | 1.8 (1.2, 2.4) |
Johnston County 6 | 449.9 (432.8, 467.6) | 22 (5, 58) | 539 | stable | 1.6 (-1.4, 4.6) |
Jones County 6 | 452.8 (380.1, 536.8) | 18 (1, 95) | 34 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4) |
Clay County 6 | 425.6 (363.0, 497.8) | 59 (1, 97) | 45 | stable | 1.4 (-0.8, 3.8) |
Northampton County 6 | 409.8 (360.5, 464.7) | 67 (3, 97) | 68 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.7) |
Alexander County 6 | 452.0 (414.4, 492.4) | 20 (1, 79) | 120 | rising | 1.3 (0.1, 2.7) |
Avery County 6 | 408.8 (356.3, 467.9) | 69 (2, 97) | 52 | stable | 1.3 (0.0, 2.7) |
Granville County 6 | 474.6 (443.7, 507.2) | 5 (1, 56) | 191 | rising | 1.3 (0.5, 2.2) |
Caldwell County 6 | 440.8 (416.4, 466.5) | 36 (5, 73) | 269 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.3) |
Mitchell County 6 | 434.0 (378.1, 496.9) | 51 (1, 96) | 54 | stable | 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9) |
Onslow County 6 | 510.7 (488.3, 533.8) | 2 (1, 9) | 408 | rising | 1.2 (0.6, 2.0) |
Sampson County 6 | 440.9 (411.6, 472.0) | 35 (3, 77) | 185 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.4) |
Bladen County 6 | 415.3 (377.9, 455.8) | 63 (7, 93) | 106 | stable | 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5) |
Halifax County 6 | 458.7 (426.3, 493.1) | 13 (1, 70) | 176 | rising | 1.1 (0.5, 1.7) |
Haywood County 6 | 466.8 (438.3, 496.8) | 10 (1, 59) | 244 | rising | 1.1 (0.1, 2.1) |
Martin County 6 | 455.8 (410.0, 506.0) | 15 (1, 85) | 87 | stable | 1.1 (-0.6, 3.0) |
Davidson County 6 | 453.9 (436.1, 472.4) | 17 (4, 57) | 529 | rising | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) |
Surry County 6 | 461.0 (434.8, 488.5) | 12 (2, 62) | 255 | rising | 1.0 (0.2, 1.7) |
Alamance County 6 | 465.1 (446.9, 483.9) | 11 (2, 46) | 524 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
McDowell County 6 | 454.3 (420.9, 489.9) | 16 (2, 73) | 155 | stable | 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0) |
Union County 6 | 438.5 (422.5, 455.0) | 43 (12, 67) | 585 | rising | 0.8 (0.3, 1.5) |
Wayne County 6 | 448.1 (426.8, 470.2) | 25 (4, 66) | 360 | stable | 0.8 (-4.6, 3.2) |
Chatham County 6 | 432.7 (407.5, 459.3) | 52 (7, 79) | 265 | stable | 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8) |
Harnett County 6 | 442.3 (420.6, 464.9) | 33 (6, 71) | 321 | stable | 0.7 (0.0, 1.4) |
Hoke County 6 | 414.2 (379.1, 451.6) | 64 (6, 94) | 110 | stable | 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Stokes County 6 | 442.0 (409.7, 476.4) | 34 (2, 83) | 158 | stable | 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6) |
Yadkin County 6 | 404.4 (369.6, 441.9) | 73 (14, 95) | 112 | stable | 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3) |
Yancey County 6 | 446.6 (395.0, 504.0) | 30 (1, 94) | 67 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Brunswick County 6 | 435.7 (416.9, 455.3) | 44 (12, 71) | 571 | stable | 0.6 (0.0, 1.3) |
Gaston County 6 | 452.1 (436.5, 468.2) | 19 (6, 56) | 669 | rising | 0.6 (0.1, 1.1) |
Montgomery County 6 | 396.9 (356.9, 440.6) | 76 (10, 97) | 81 | stable | 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4) |
Pamlico County 6 | 434.6 (371.6, 507.0) | 49 (1, 96) | 47 | stable | 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5) |
Transylvania County 6 | 384.9 (351.0, 421.8) | 85 (32, 97) | 126 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9) |
Caswell County 6 | 440.6 (392.5, 493.5) | 37 (1, 92) | 75 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7) |
Madison County 6 | 447.8 (400.7, 499.4) | 27 (1, 88) | 76 | stable | 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2) |
Richmond County 6 | 439.9 (406.3, 475.8) | 38 (2, 83) | 138 | stable | 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Chowan County 6 | 387.1 (333.7, 447.7) | 83 (6, 98) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0) |
Franklin County 6 | 407.0 (380.5, 434.9) | 70 (21, 93) | 191 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Henderson County 6 | 447.7 (427.6, 468.6) | 28 (5, 64) | 455 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
Warren County 6 | 417.6 (367.8, 472.8) | 61 (2, 96) | 68 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
Buncombe County 6 | 444.9 (430.8, 459.2) | 32 (9, 59) | 852 | stable | 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9) |
Columbus County 6 | 396.7 (368.4, 426.8) | 77 (33, 94) | 164 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4) |
Duplin County 6 | 369.9 (342.3, 399.2) | 91 (62, 98) | 149 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6) |
Rockingham County 6 | 446.9 (423.8, 471.0) | 29 (3, 68) | 318 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9) |
Wake County 6 | 428.2 (420.6, 435.9) | 57 (35, 66) | 2,535 | rising | 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) |
Washington County 6 | 396.3 (338.3, 462.6) | 78 (2, 98) | 41 | stable | 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5) |
Burke County 6 | 416.3 (393.6, 440.1) | 62 (21, 86) | 283 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Carteret County 6 | 449.6 (423.1, 477.6) | 23 (3, 71) | 264 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Lincoln County 6 | 439.4 (414.6, 465.5) | 40 (5, 76) | 254 | stable | 0.2 (-1.9, 0.9) |
Macon County 6 | 425.6 (389.3, 464.9) | 58 (4, 92) | 135 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6) |
New Hanover County 6 | 431.7 (416.6, 447.2) | 53 (18, 71) | 679 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8) |
Orange County 6 | 439.0 (418.6, 460.1) | 41 (8, 71) | 371 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Polk County 6 | 397.1 (350.4, 449.1) | 75 (5, 97) | 77 | stable | 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7) |
Swain County 6 | 479.5 (418.1, 548.1) | 3 (1, 86) | 48 | stable | 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2) |
Iredell County 6 | 446.5 (428.9, 464.7) | 31 (7, 65) | 511 | stable | 0.1 (-2.2, 0.9) |
Randolph County 6 | 458.3 (438.9, 478.5) | 14 (3, 56) | 451 | stable | 0.1 (-2.3, 0.9) |
Scotland County 6 | 430.7 (392.4, 471.9) | 56 (3, 92) | 104 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
Forsyth County 6 | 431.4 (419.6, 443.5) | 54 (23, 67) | 1,079 | stable | 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 413.1 (405.6, 420.6) | 65 (53, 77) | 2,423 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Moore County 6 | 449.1 (426.6, 472.5) | 24 (4, 68) | 358 | stable | 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0) |
Stanly County 6 | 473.1 (442.7, 505.2) | 7 (1, 56) | 201 | stable | 0.0 (-6.7, 3.4) |
Cumberland County 6 | 430.9 (417.1, 445.1) | 55 (21, 70) | 766 | stable | -0.1 (-3.0, 1.0) |
Hertford County 6 | 366.4 (323.7, 413.5) | 93 (36, 99) | 65 | stable | -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) |
Nash County 6 | 406.8 (384.5, 430.0) | 71 (32, 91) | 274 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Pitt County 6 | 406.7 (388.9, 425.2) | 72 (40, 88) | 413 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3) |
Rowan County 6 | 468.6 (448.6, 489.2) | 8 (2, 45) | 450 | stable | -0.1 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Rutherford County 6 | 410.2 (384.1, 437.9) | 66 (20, 91) | 211 | stable | -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | 379.2 (354.4, 405.5) | 86 (59, 96) | 200 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Craven County 6 | 435.4 (412.2, 459.6) | 45 (8, 76) | 304 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 395.8 (366.9, 426.6) | 79 (28, 95) | 159 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
Graham County 6 | 367.4 (302.8, 443.9) | 92 (3, 100) | 26 | stable | -0.2 (-16.5, 5.4) |
Lee County 6 | 418.6 (389.6, 449.3) | 60 (12, 89) | 167 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
Pender County 6 | 388.7 (361.4, 417.6) | 82 (41, 96) | 165 | stable | -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6) |
Wilson County 6 | 379.0 (356.1, 403.0) | 87 (62, 96) | 223 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
Hyde County 6 | 335.2 (255.4, 437.6) | 96 (5, 100) | 14 | stable | -0.3 (-4.5, 4.0) |
Dare County 6 | 378.9 (345.2, 415.4) | 88 (37, 98) | 108 | stable | -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1) |
Guilford County 6 | 434.3 (424.2, 444.6) | 50 (24, 64) | 1,468 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 0.2) |
Greene County 6 | 389.8 (340.2, 445.1) | 81 (7, 98) | 51 | stable | -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 439.7 (423.1, 456.8) | 39 (11, 67) | 541 | stable | -0.7 (-2.4, 0.1) |
Perquimans County 6 | 358.9 (306.7, 418.6) | 95 (25, 99) | 43 | stable | -0.8 (-3.1, 1.7) |
Watauga County 6 | 364.1 (332.8, 397.9) | 94 (60, 98) | 114 | stable | -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4) |
Durham County 6 | 434.9 (421.2, 449.0) | 47 (17, 67) | 800 | falling | -1.2 (-2.9, -0.1) |
Beaufort County 6 | 385.7 (356.0, 417.4) | 84 (44, 96) | 150 | falling | -1.3 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Jackson County 6 | 378.2 (344.6, 414.4) | 89 (41, 97) | 109 | stable | -1.6 (-7.7, 0.0) |
Camden County 6 | 319.4 (260.0, 389.3) | 97 (55, 100) | 21 | stable | -1.7 (-4.3, 1.2) |
Gates County 6 | 266.1 (216.0, 325.5) | 100 (92, 100) | 23 | stable | -1.9 (-5.8, 1.8) |
Vance County 6 | 434.9 (401.3, 470.8) | 46 (4, 84) | 140 | stable | -2.5 (-8.2, 2.2) |
Catawba County 6 | 395.5 (378.3, 413.4) | 80 (56, 92) | 430 | falling | -3.0 (-6.1, -0.7) |
Davie County 6 | 450.5 (415.9, 487.5) | 21 (1, 76) | 143 | stable | -3.1 (-7.9, 0.4) |
Person County 6 | 476.9 (439.9, 516.4) | 4 (1, 64) | 140 | falling | -3.4 (-6.5, -0.1) |
Cherokee County 6 | 438.6 (398.9, 481.9) | 42 (2, 88) | 117 | stable | -4.2 (-9.2, 1.2) |
Alleghany County 6 | 317.3 (266.1, 377.8) | 98 (66, 100) | 33 | falling | -5.4 (-10.9, -0.7) |
Ashe County 6 | 372.1 (333.4, 414.7) | 90 (39, 98) | 84 | stable | -6.1 (-12.6, 0.1) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 409.7 (374.4, 447.5) | 68 (9, 95) | 109 | stable | -6.6 (-14.4, 0.9) |
Currituck County 6 | 272.4 (238.4, 310.3) | 99 (95, 100) | 50 | falling | -13.7 (-23.2, -3.6) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 4:50 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 4:50 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.