Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 107.1 (106.0, 108.3) | N/A | 6,816 | stable | -0.1 (-0.5, 0.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) | N/A | 202,435 | stable | 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 176.5 (107.5, 273.1) | 1 (1, 96) | 4 |
|
|
Granville County 6 | 141.5 (124.6, 160.0) | 2 (1, 34) | 52 | stable | -0.5 (-10.2, 3.2) |
Stokes County 6 | 130.2 (111.2, 151.4) | 3 (1, 73) | 35 | stable | 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5) |
Stanly County 6 | 131.6 (115.1, 149.7) | 4 (1, 58) | 47 | stable | 1.8 (-0.5, 4.3) |
Lenoir County 6 | 130.4 (112.9, 149.9) | 5 (1, 69) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-2.2, 1.8) |
Lincoln County 6 | 127.6 (114.2, 142.2) | 6 (1, 57) | 67 | rising | 1.5 (0.2, 2.9) |
Pamlico County 6 | 127.3 (89.7, 175.4) | 7 (1, 95) | 8 | stable | 0.7 (-3.9, 5.4) |
Haywood County 6 | 125.9 (109.4, 144.2) | 8 (1, 75) | 42 | stable | 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6) |
Caswell County 6 | 125.3 (98.7, 156.7) | 9 (1, 91) | 16 | stable | 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5) |
Person County 6 | 125.9 (105.8, 148.6) | 10 (1, 84) | 28 | stable | -6.5 (-17.5, 4.6) |
Alexander County 6 | 123.1 (103.2, 145.6) | 11 (1, 88) | 28 | stable | 1.7 (-2.2, 5.9) |
Jones County 6 | 118.2 (78.2, 171.1) | 12 (1, 96) | 6 | stable | -0.1 (-4.0, 3.6) |
Halifax County 6 | 121.4 (103.2, 141.7) | 13 (1, 86) | 32 | stable | 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5) |
Iredell County 6 | 120.9 (112.0, 130.4) | 14 (3, 58) | 138 | stable | 0.8 (-6.9, 4.3) |
Onslow County 6 | 120.5 (110.5, 131.0) | 15 (4, 60) | 125 | stable | -0.8 (-2.4, 0.2) |
Mitchell County 6 | 121.0 (89.3, 160.5) | 16 (1, 96) | 10 | stable | 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6) |
Northampton County 6 | 117.8 (89.0, 153.0) | 17 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 1.6 (-2.0, 5.0) |
Davidson County 6 | 118.7 (109.2, 128.8) | 18 (4, 67) | 118 | stable | 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2) |
Moore County 6 | 117.8 (105.2, 131.5) | 19 (4, 77) | 64 | stable | -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8) |
Bladen County 6 | 115.7 (94.6, 140.1) | 20 (1, 92) | 21 | stable | 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0) |
Cleveland County 6 | 116.2 (103.7, 129.7) | 21 (3, 80) | 65 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3) |
Chatham County 6 | 117.2 (102.5, 133.4) | 22 (2, 83) | 47 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8) |
Wayne County 6 | 117.1 (106.0, 129.1) | 23 (4, 75) | 82 | rising | 1.8 (0.8, 2.8) |
Polk County 6 | 114.9 (86.3, 150.0) | 24 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 2.8 (-2.2, 8.6) |
Sampson County 6 | 116.8 (101.5, 133.6) | 25 (3, 85) | 43 | stable | 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9) |
Johnston County 6 | 116.2 (108.2, 124.7) | 26 (7, 64) | 158 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1) |
Randolph County 6 | 116.1 (106.0, 126.9) | 27 (5, 75) | 98 | stable | -1.5 (-5.9, 0.6) |
Vance County 6 | 116.1 (97.5, 137.0) | 28 (2, 91) | 28 | stable | 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4) |
Rutherford County 6 | 115.1 (100.1, 131.8) | 29 (3, 87) | 43 | stable | 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5) |
Davie County 6 | 115.6 (96.8, 137.0) | 30 (2, 91) | 27 | stable | 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Warren County 6 | 115.2 (86.9, 149.7) | 31 (1, 95) | 11 | stable | 2.2 (-0.7, 5.4) |
McDowell County 6 | 115.1 (97.5, 135.0) | 32 (2, 89) | 31 | stable | -0.8 (-14.0, 2.4) |
Yancey County 6 | 114.8 (86.0, 150.2) | 33 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | -4.3 (-22.9, 0.2) |
Anson County 6 | 112.4 (88.9, 140.0) | 34 (1, 95) | 16 | stable | 2.2 (-0.8, 5.4) |
Scotland County 6 | 111.9 (92.2, 134.4) | 35 (2, 93) | 23 | stable | 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4) |
Alamance County 6 | 112.2 (102.9, 122.0) | 36 (10, 80) | 110 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5) |
Lee County 6 | 111.1 (96.3, 127.6) | 37 (3, 89) | 40 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 2.1) |
Gaston County 6 | 110.4 (102.7, 118.6) | 38 (13, 76) | 155 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Pender County 6 | 111.4 (96.8, 127.5) | 39 (4, 89) | 42 | stable | -8.4 (-16.6, 0.2) |
Union County 6 | 110.8 (103.5, 118.5) | 40 (13, 76) | 179 | rising | 1.3 (0.2, 2.5) |
New Hanover County 6 | 110.0 (102.3, 118.2) | 41 (14, 80) | 153 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2) |
Rockingham County 6 | 110.2 (97.7, 124.0) | 42 (6, 88) | 57 | stable | -1.6 (-14.4, 1.1) |
Caldwell County 6 | 109.9 (96.9, 124.1) | 43 (7, 90) | 54 | stable | 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2) |
Yadkin County 6 | 109.3 (90.0, 131.3) | 44 (3, 94) | 23 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7) |
Catawba County 6 | 109.9 (100.6, 119.9) | 45 (11, 83) | 104 | stable | -1.9 (-7.6, 0.5) |
Buncombe County 6 | 109.1 (101.9, 116.6) | 46 (17, 80) | 173 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5) |
Bertie County 6 | 109.7 (82.9, 142.4) | 47 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 1.9 (-11.6, 16.7) |
Craven County 6 | 108.9 (96.6, 122.4) | 48 (7, 88) | 58 | stable | 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4) |
Brunswick County 6 | 109.4 (98.1, 121.6) | 49 (10, 86) | 69 | stable | 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4) |
Swain County 6 | 109.2 (79.2, 146.8) | 50 (1, 96) | 9 | stable | -0.9 (-4.5, 2.3) |
Carteret County 6 | 109.0 (94.3, 125.5) | 51 (5, 91) | 40 | falling | -8.5 (-14.7, -1.0) |
Duplin County 6 | 107.8 (92.6, 124.8) | 52 (6, 92) | 36 | stable | 2.0 (-0.2, 4.5) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 107.7 (91.1, 126.4) | 53 (4, 93) | 30 | stable | 0.4 (-2.6, 3.1) |
Durham County 6 | 107.3 (101.0, 113.9) | 54 (22, 80) | 225 | stable | 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 107.5 (100.0, 115.4) | 55 (19, 83) | 153 | stable | -1.1 (-3.5, 0.1) |
Robeson County 6 | 107.5 (97.3, 118.4) | 56 (11, 87) | 83 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2) |
Orange County 6 | 107.9 (98.2, 118.4) | 57 (14, 86) | 92 | stable | -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5) |
Henderson County 6 | 106.7 (95.5, 118.8) | 58 (10, 89) | 67 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7) |
Macon County 6 | 106.9 (85.8, 131.4) | 59 (2, 96) | 18 | stable | -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0) |
Burke County 6 | 106.2 (93.8, 119.7) | 60 (11, 90) | 55 | falling | -3.2 (-8.1, -0.6) |
Beaufort County 6 | 104.8 (87.5, 124.5) | 61 (4, 94) | 26 | stable | -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0) |
Hertford County 6 | 105.5 (81.8, 133.8) | 62 (2, 96) | 14 | stable | 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2) |
Hoke County 6 | 104.6 (89.8, 121.0) | 63 (7, 93) | 37 | stable | -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4) |
Rowan County 6 | 104.5 (94.8, 114.9) | 64 (15, 88) | 86 | falling | -2.0 (-5.7, -0.2) |
Jackson County 6 | 104.9 (86.3, 126.1) | 65 (4, 95) | 23 | stable | 0.3 (-3.5, 4.1) |
Harnett County 6 | 104.1 (94.6, 114.3) | 66 (19, 90) | 89 | stable | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
Cherokee County 6 | 104.6 (81.8, 132.0) | 67 (2, 96) | 15 | stable | 0.6 (-3.3, 4.7) |
Wake County 6 | 103.6 (100.4, 106.9) | 68 (44, 79) | 788 | stable | -0.5 (-1.8, 0.1) |
Cumberland County 6 | 103.9 (97.4, 110.6) | 69 (32, 86) | 199 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2) |
Pitt County 6 | 102.5 (93.8, 111.8) | 70 (22, 90) | 105 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 102.7 (99.5, 106.0) | 71 (48, 82) | 774 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Guilford County 6 | 101.5 (96.6, 106.5) | 72 (43, 86) | 331 | stable | -1.1 (-7.1, 0.9) |
Richmond County 6 | 101.4 (84.7, 120.3) | 73 (6, 95) | 26 | falling | -4.4 (-14.8, -0.8) |
Forsyth County 6 | 101.1 (95.3, 107.1) | 74 (42, 88) | 229 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
Surry County 6 | 100.0 (86.9, 114.6) | 75 (16, 94) | 43 | stable | 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1) |
Ashe County 6 | 100.5 (78.4, 127.1) | 76 (3, 96) | 14 | falling | -15.2 (-26.1, -3.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | 100.5 (86.7, 115.8) | 77 (15, 94) | 39 | rising | 2.3 (0.8, 5.0) |
Clay County 6 | 99.5 (64.7, 146.5) | 78 (1, 97) | 5 | stable | -0.3 (-4.9, 4.3) |
Madison County 6 | 97.2 (73.9, 125.6) | 79 (3, 96) | 12 | stable | -1.2 (-4.0, 1.5) |
Martin County 6 | 97.0 (73.2, 126.1) | 80 (2, 96) | 11 | stable | -1.6 (-4.6, 1.2) |
Dare County 6 | 97.0 (79.0, 118.0) | 81 (10, 96) | 20 | stable | 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1) |
Perquimans County 6 | 93.6 (63.4, 133.1) | 82 (2, 97) | 6 | stable | -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3) |
Montgomery County 6 | 96.6 (75.5, 121.8) | 83 (5, 96) | 14 | stable | 1.6 (-1.1, 4.5) |
Nash County 6 | 94.3 (83.1, 106.7) | 84 (33, 95) | 51 | stable | -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Franklin County 6 | 93.8 (81.0, 108.1) | 85 (28, 96) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0) |
Columbus County 6 | 92.7 (78.3, 108.9) | 86 (20, 96) | 30 | stable | -1.1 (-3.9, 1.6) |
Washington County 6 | 93.2 (60.0, 137.6) | 87 (1, 97) | 5 | stable | -1.3 (-4.5, 1.4) |
Greene County 6 | 92.4 (70.4, 119.0) | 88 (7, 96) | 12 | stable | -0.7 (-3.7, 2.2) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 91.0 (74.3, 110.3) | 89 (16, 96) | 21 | stable | -11.2 (-25.3, 3.3) |
Watauga County 6 | 90.6 (74.6, 108.9) | 90 (23, 96) | 24 | stable | -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2) |
Wilson County 6 | 91.1 (79.2, 104.3) | 91 (37, 96) | 43 | stable | -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1) |
Avery County 6 | 86.2 (63.2, 115.2) | 92 (6, 96) | 9 | stable | 2.1 (-1.6, 6.4) |
Camden County 6 | 86.9 (57.6, 125.8) | 93 (3, 97) | 6 | stable | -0.6 (-5.8, 4.9) |
Chowan County 6 | 86.9 (58.5, 123.9) | 94 (4, 97) | 6 | stable | 1.2 (-6.1, 8.1) |
Transylvania County 6 | 86.6 (67.6, 109.4) | 95 (20, 96) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.1) |
Gates County 6 | 71.2 (44.3, 108.5) | 96 (13, 97) | 4 | stable | 1.1 (-3.4, 5.8) |
Currituck County 6 | 45.4 (32.1, 62.6) | 97 (95, 97) | 8 | falling | -27.6 (-44.9, -12.0) |
Alleghany County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 1:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Graham, Hyde
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 1:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Graham, Hyde
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.