Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 344.0 (335.0, 353.3) N/A 1,564 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 352.6 (351.8, 353.5) N/A 144,674 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Moore County 6 641.0 (484.9, 824.9) 1 (1, 21) 16 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.0, 1.8)
Polk County 6 625.8 (310.2, 1,080.8) 2 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Craven County 6 555.6 (421.0, 714.7) 3 (1, 35) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.5)
Hoke County 6 511.3 (367.9, 686.0) 4 (1, 52) 14 stable stable trend -19.3 (-43.7, 15.7)
Burke County 6 500.7 (354.6, 679.5) 5 (1, 57) 11
*
*
Transylvania County 6 494.4 (284.2, 787.2) 6 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Brunswick County 6 481.8 (380.0, 600.2) 7 (1, 42) 18 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 6.5)
Granville County 6 470.0 (348.2, 619.7) 8 (1, 51) 13 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -1.5)
McDowell County 6 466.4 (290.4, 700.8) 9 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend 6.3 (-1.3, 14.6)
New Hanover County 6 459.2 (377.7, 551.2) 10 (2, 41) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 3.0)
Scotland County 6 434.7 (243.8, 712.8) 11 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Lenoir County 6 434.4 (298.6, 605.3) 12 (1, 64) 9
*
*
Davidson County 6 432.6 (344.1, 534.7) 13 (2, 52) 24 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.4, 9.5)
Cabarrus County 6 425.1 (356.9, 501.0) 14 (4, 44) 40 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.1)
Onslow County 6 421.8 (349.4, 503.3) 15 (3, 48) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Richmond County 6 418.6 (259.4, 629.2) 16 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Alexander County 6 415.4 (245.2, 651.4) 17 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Watauga County 6 413.8 (207.8, 713.1) 18 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Orange County 6 409.6 (329.8, 501.5) 19 (4, 53) 25 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 4.9)
Johnston County 6 408.5 (346.3, 477.5) 20 (5, 46) 48 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.9, 8.1)
Harnett County 6 407.2 (319.7, 508.4) 21 (3, 57) 24 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.2, 8.0)
Davie County 6 397.1 (247.2, 596.3) 22 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Gaston County 6 397.0 (326.2, 477.2) 23 (5, 52) 31 rising rising trend 11.0 (1.6, 21.2)
Beaufort County 6 383.6 (218.1, 610.6) 24 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-6.5, 7.9)
Surry County 6 373.0 (263.5, 507.6) 25 (3, 66) 12 rising rising trend 7.3 (1.6, 13.3)
Caldwell County 6 372.9 (254.0, 523.4) 26 (2, 67) 8 rising rising trend 8.3 (2.5, 14.5)
Wake County 6 368.1 (339.5, 398.2) 27 (15, 44) 185 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 366.8 (283.5, 464.3) 28 (5, 61) 22 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.7, 7.8)
Iredell County 6 360.6 (290.4, 440.8) 29 (8, 59) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Franklin County 6 358.6 (242.1, 505.2) 30 (3, 67) 9 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.7, 10.3)
Robeson County 6 357.3 (270.6, 460.2) 31 (5, 63) 17
*
*
Pitt County 6 354.8 (273.1, 450.9) 32 (7, 64) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.1)
Durham County 6 347.5 (297.4, 402.6) 33 (13, 57) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Buncombe County 6 346.8 (283.7, 418.5) 34 (11, 62) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Alamance County 6 345.9 (278.8, 422.4) 35 (10, 61) 30 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.6, 7.1)
Mecklenburg County 6 339.2 (316.0, 363.4) 36 (23, 49) 236 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Pender County 6 334.6 (221.9, 479.9) 37 (3, 68) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.9, 7.1)
Rowan County 6 333.3 (257.8, 422.0) 38 (9, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.1, 5.2)
Lincoln County 6 328.4 (247.7, 425.5) 39 (9, 65) 13 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 6.7)
Montgomery County 6 328.3 (138.9, 629.3) 40 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Lee County 6 327.2 (249.1, 419.9) 41 (9, 65) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 4.2)
Union County 6 322.3 (272.0, 378.3) 42 (18, 62) 42 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.9)
Chatham County 6 319.6 (234.0, 423.3) 43 (8, 66) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.2, 5.7)
Cumberland County 6 318.5 (280.3, 359.9) 44 (23, 60) 60 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Pasquotank County 6 315.8 (157.6, 548.1) 45 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Macon County 6 314.4 (182.3, 499.2) 46 (3, 68) 4
*
*
Yadkin County 6 311.9 (178.3, 496.2) 47 (3, 68) 5
*
*
Sampson County 6 302.2 (228.7, 390.0) 48 (12, 66) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 2.1)
Forsyth County 6 301.7 (262.6, 344.5) 49 (27, 62) 66 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Nash County 6 299.1 (206.4, 415.1) 50 (8, 68) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.4, 2.7)
Person County 6 298.9 (166.2, 491.9) 51 (3, 68) 4
*
*
Duplin County 6 298.7 (218.5, 395.7) 52 (12, 67) 17 stable stable trend 6.3 (-0.3, 13.3)
Guilford County 6 297.3 (258.9, 339.3) 53 (27, 63) 60 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.8)
Edgecombe County 6 295.4 (176.3, 462.1) 54 (5, 68) 4
*
*
Henderson County 6 293.5 (231.2, 366.1) 55 (18, 66) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.5)
Greene County 6 276.5 (130.9, 494.8) 56 (2, 68) 3
*
*
Randolph County 6 273.6 (207.1, 353.0) 57 (21, 68) 20
*
*
Jackson County 6 273.2 (150.1, 455.0) 58 (5, 68) 4
*
*
Dare County 6 271.6 (156.4, 434.0) 59 (7, 68) 4
*
*
Catawba County 6 271.4 (213.7, 338.4) 60 (24, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.3)
Vance County 6 267.0 (149.9, 438.2) 61 (6, 68) 4
*
*
Haywood County 6 241.2 (136.3, 388.0) 62 (11, 68) 3
*
*
Rockingham County 6 239.6 (154.7, 350.9) 63 (20, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.9, 8.0)
Wilkes County 6 234.8 (153.5, 343.1) 64 (22, 68) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.7, 3.8)
Rutherford County 6 224.4 (128.9, 358.6) 65 (16, 68) 4
*
*
Carteret County 6 221.4 (120.0, 366.4) 66 (15, 68) 3 stable stable trend -4.6 (-10.9, 2.2)
Wilson County 6 207.4 (137.1, 299.2) 67 (34, 68) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.9, 6.1)
Cleveland County 6 196.3 (117.3, 305.6) 68 (30, 68) 4
*
*
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/28/2023 10:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top