Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 107.1 (106.0, 108.3) | N/A | 6,816 | stable | -0.1 (-0.5, 0.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) | N/A | 202,435 | stable | 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3) |
Polk County 6 | 114.9 (86.3, 150.0) | 24 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 2.8 (-2.2, 8.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | 100.5 (86.7, 115.8) | 77 (15, 94) | 39 | rising | 2.3 (0.8, 5.0) |
Anson County 6 | 112.4 (88.9, 140.0) | 34 (1, 95) | 16 | stable | 2.2 (-0.8, 5.4) |
Warren County 6 | 115.2 (86.9, 149.7) | 31 (1, 95) | 11 | stable | 2.2 (-0.7, 5.4) |
Avery County 6 | 86.2 (63.2, 115.2) | 92 (6, 96) | 9 | stable | 2.1 (-1.6, 6.4) |
Duplin County 6 | 107.8 (92.6, 124.8) | 52 (6, 92) | 36 | stable | 2.0 (-0.2, 4.5) |
Bertie County 6 | 109.7 (82.9, 142.4) | 47 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 1.9 (-11.6, 16.7) |
Stanly County 6 | 131.6 (115.1, 149.7) | 4 (1, 58) | 47 | stable | 1.8 (-0.5, 4.3) |
Wayne County 6 | 117.1 (106.0, 129.1) | 23 (4, 75) | 82 | rising | 1.8 (0.8, 2.8) |
Alexander County 6 | 123.1 (103.2, 145.6) | 11 (1, 88) | 28 | stable | 1.7 (-2.2, 5.9) |
Cleveland County 6 | 116.2 (103.7, 129.7) | 21 (3, 80) | 65 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3) |
Montgomery County 6 | 96.6 (75.5, 121.8) | 83 (5, 96) | 14 | stable | 1.6 (-1.1, 4.5) |
Northampton County 6 | 117.8 (89.0, 153.0) | 17 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | 1.6 (-2.0, 5.0) |
Lincoln County 6 | 127.6 (114.2, 142.2) | 6 (1, 57) | 67 | rising | 1.5 (0.2, 2.9) |
Union County 6 | 110.8 (103.5, 118.5) | 40 (13, 76) | 179 | rising | 1.3 (0.2, 2.5) |
Chowan County 6 | 86.9 (58.5, 123.9) | 94 (4, 97) | 6 | stable | 1.2 (-6.1, 8.1) |
Hertford County 6 | 105.5 (81.8, 133.8) | 62 (2, 96) | 14 | stable | 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2) |
Gates County 6 | 71.2 (44.3, 108.5) | 96 (13, 97) | 4 | stable | 1.1 (-3.4, 5.8) |
Halifax County 6 | 121.4 (103.2, 141.7) | 13 (1, 86) | 32 | stable | 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5) |
Sampson County 6 | 116.8 (101.5, 133.6) | 25 (3, 85) | 43 | stable | 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9) |
Dare County 6 | 97.0 (79.0, 118.0) | 81 (10, 96) | 20 | stable | 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1) |
Davidson County 6 | 118.7 (109.2, 128.8) | 18 (4, 67) | 118 | stable | 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2) |
Caswell County 6 | 125.3 (98.7, 156.7) | 9 (1, 91) | 16 | stable | 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5) |
Iredell County 6 | 120.9 (112.0, 130.4) | 14 (3, 58) | 138 | stable | 0.8 (-6.9, 4.3) |
Haywood County 6 | 125.9 (109.4, 144.2) | 8 (1, 75) | 42 | stable | 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6) |
Pamlico County 6 | 127.3 (89.7, 175.4) | 7 (1, 95) | 8 | stable | 0.7 (-3.9, 5.4) |
Stokes County 6 | 130.2 (111.2, 151.4) | 3 (1, 73) | 35 | stable | 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5) |
Bladen County 6 | 115.7 (94.6, 140.1) | 20 (1, 92) | 21 | stable | 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0) |
Caldwell County 6 | 109.9 (96.9, 124.1) | 43 (7, 90) | 54 | stable | 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2) |
Cherokee County 6 | 104.6 (81.8, 132.0) | 67 (2, 96) | 15 | stable | 0.6 (-3.3, 4.7) |
Chatham County 6 | 117.2 (102.5, 133.4) | 22 (2, 83) | 47 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8) |
Buncombe County 6 | 109.1 (101.9, 116.6) | 46 (17, 80) | 173 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 107.7 (91.1, 126.4) | 53 (4, 93) | 30 | stable | 0.4 (-2.6, 3.1) |
Mitchell County 6 | 121.0 (89.3, 160.5) | 16 (1, 96) | 10 | stable | 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6) |
Rutherford County 6 | 115.1 (100.1, 131.8) | 29 (3, 87) | 43 | stable | 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5) |
Surry County 6 | 100.0 (86.9, 114.6) | 75 (16, 94) | 43 | stable | 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1) |
Alamance County 6 | 112.2 (102.9, 122.0) | 36 (10, 80) | 110 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5) |
Durham County 6 | 107.3 (101.0, 113.9) | 54 (22, 80) | 225 | stable | 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3) |
Jackson County 6 | 104.9 (86.3, 126.1) | 65 (4, 95) | 23 | stable | 0.3 (-3.5, 4.1) |
Lee County 6 | 111.1 (96.3, 127.6) | 37 (3, 89) | 40 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 2.1) |
Vance County 6 | 116.1 (97.5, 137.0) | 28 (2, 91) | 28 | stable | 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4) |
Craven County 6 | 108.9 (96.6, 122.4) | 48 (7, 88) | 58 | stable | 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4) |
Cumberland County 6 | 103.9 (97.4, 110.6) | 69 (32, 86) | 199 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2) |
Davie County 6 | 115.6 (96.8, 137.0) | 30 (2, 91) | 27 | stable | 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Johnston County 6 | 116.2 (108.2, 124.7) | 26 (7, 64) | 158 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1) |
Robeson County 6 | 107.5 (97.3, 118.4) | 56 (11, 87) | 83 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2) |
Brunswick County 6 | 109.4 (98.1, 121.6) | 49 (10, 86) | 69 | stable | 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4) |
Franklin County 6 | 93.8 (81.0, 108.1) | 85 (28, 96) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0) |
Gaston County 6 | 110.4 (102.7, 118.6) | 38 (13, 76) | 155 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Harnett County 6 | 104.1 (94.6, 114.3) | 66 (19, 90) | 89 | stable | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
New Hanover County 6 | 110.0 (102.3, 118.2) | 41 (14, 80) | 153 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2) |
Scotland County 6 | 111.9 (92.2, 134.4) | 35 (2, 93) | 23 | stable | 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4) |
Hoke County 6 | 104.6 (89.8, 121.0) | 63 (7, 93) | 37 | stable | -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4) |
Jones County 6 | 118.2 (78.2, 171.1) | 12 (1, 96) | 6 | stable | -0.1 (-4.0, 3.6) |
Lenoir County 6 | 130.4 (112.9, 149.9) | 5 (1, 69) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-2.2, 1.8) |
Moore County 6 | 117.8 (105.2, 131.5) | 19 (4, 77) | 64 | stable | -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8) |
Orange County 6 | 107.9 (98.2, 118.4) | 57 (14, 86) | 92 | stable | -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5) |
Pitt County 6 | 102.5 (93.8, 111.8) | 70 (22, 90) | 105 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7) |
Clay County 6 | 99.5 (64.7, 146.5) | 78 (1, 97) | 5 | stable | -0.3 (-4.9, 4.3) |
Henderson County 6 | 106.7 (95.5, 118.8) | 58 (10, 89) | 67 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7) |
Yadkin County 6 | 109.3 (90.0, 131.3) | 44 (3, 94) | 23 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7) |
Beaufort County 6 | 104.8 (87.5, 124.5) | 61 (4, 94) | 26 | stable | -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 102.7 (99.5, 106.0) | 71 (48, 82) | 774 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Granville County 6 | 141.5 (124.6, 160.0) | 2 (1, 34) | 52 | stable | -0.5 (-10.2, 3.2) |
Nash County 6 | 94.3 (83.1, 106.7) | 84 (33, 95) | 51 | stable | -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Wake County 6 | 103.6 (100.4, 106.9) | 68 (44, 79) | 788 | stable | -0.5 (-1.8, 0.1) |
Wilson County 6 | 91.1 (79.2, 104.3) | 91 (37, 96) | 43 | stable | -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1) |
Camden County 6 | 86.9 (57.6, 125.8) | 93 (3, 97) | 6 | stable | -0.6 (-5.8, 4.9) |
Forsyth County 6 | 101.1 (95.3, 107.1) | 74 (42, 88) | 229 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
Greene County 6 | 92.4 (70.4, 119.0) | 88 (7, 96) | 12 | stable | -0.7 (-3.7, 2.2) |
Macon County 6 | 106.9 (85.8, 131.4) | 59 (2, 96) | 18 | stable | -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0) |
McDowell County 6 | 115.1 (97.5, 135.0) | 32 (2, 89) | 31 | stable | -0.8 (-14.0, 2.4) |
Onslow County 6 | 120.5 (110.5, 131.0) | 15 (4, 60) | 125 | stable | -0.8 (-2.4, 0.2) |
Transylvania County 6 | 86.6 (67.6, 109.4) | 95 (20, 96) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.1) |
Swain County 6 | 109.2 (79.2, 146.8) | 50 (1, 96) | 9 | stable | -0.9 (-4.5, 2.3) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 107.5 (100.0, 115.4) | 55 (19, 83) | 153 | stable | -1.1 (-3.5, 0.1) |
Columbus County 6 | 92.7 (78.3, 108.9) | 86 (20, 96) | 30 | stable | -1.1 (-3.9, 1.6) |
Guilford County 6 | 101.5 (96.6, 106.5) | 72 (43, 86) | 331 | stable | -1.1 (-7.1, 0.9) |
Madison County 6 | 97.2 (73.9, 125.6) | 79 (3, 96) | 12 | stable | -1.2 (-4.0, 1.5) |
Washington County 6 | 93.2 (60.0, 137.6) | 87 (1, 97) | 5 | stable | -1.3 (-4.5, 1.4) |
Randolph County 6 | 116.1 (106.0, 126.9) | 27 (5, 75) | 98 | stable | -1.5 (-5.9, 0.6) |
Martin County 6 | 97.0 (73.2, 126.1) | 80 (2, 96) | 11 | stable | -1.6 (-4.6, 1.2) |
Rockingham County 6 | 110.2 (97.7, 124.0) | 42 (6, 88) | 57 | stable | -1.6 (-14.4, 1.1) |
Watauga County 6 | 90.6 (74.6, 108.9) | 90 (23, 96) | 24 | stable | -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2) |
Catawba County 6 | 109.9 (100.6, 119.9) | 45 (11, 83) | 104 | stable | -1.9 (-7.6, 0.5) |
Rowan County 6 | 104.5 (94.8, 114.9) | 64 (15, 88) | 86 | falling | -2.0 (-5.7, -0.2) |
Perquimans County 6 | 93.6 (63.4, 133.1) | 82 (2, 97) | 6 | stable | -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3) |
Burke County 6 | 106.2 (93.8, 119.7) | 60 (11, 90) | 55 | falling | -3.2 (-8.1, -0.6) |
Yancey County 6 | 114.8 (86.0, 150.2) | 33 (1, 96) | 11 | stable | -4.3 (-22.9, 0.2) |
Richmond County 6 | 101.4 (84.7, 120.3) | 73 (6, 95) | 26 | falling | -4.4 (-14.8, -0.8) |
Person County 6 | 125.9 (105.8, 148.6) | 10 (1, 84) | 28 | stable | -6.5 (-17.5, 4.6) |
Pender County 6 | 111.4 (96.8, 127.5) | 39 (4, 89) | 42 | stable | -8.4 (-16.6, 0.2) |
Carteret County 6 | 109.0 (94.3, 125.5) | 51 (5, 91) | 40 | falling | -8.5 (-14.7, -1.0) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 91.0 (74.3, 110.3) | 89 (16, 96) | 21 | stable | -11.2 (-25.3, 3.3) |
Ashe County 6 | 100.5 (78.4, 127.1) | 76 (3, 96) | 14 | falling | -15.2 (-26.1, -3.6) |
Currituck County 6 | 45.4 (32.1, 62.6) | 97 (95, 97) | 8 | falling | -27.6 (-44.9, -12.0) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 176.5 (107.5, 273.1) | 1 (1, 96) | 4 |
|
|
Alleghany County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2024 1:21 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Graham, Hyde
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2024 1:21 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Graham, Hyde
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.