Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 12.8 (12.6, 13.1) N/A 1,661 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Vance County 6 Rural 8.2 (5.2, 12.6) 89 (35, 89) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.0, 1.8)
Hoke County 6 Urban 9.8 (6.3, 14.6) 88 (12, 89) 5 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.4, 0.3)
Martin County 6 Rural 10.0 (5.9, 16.5) 87 (5, 89) 4
*
*
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 10.1 (9.3, 11.0) 86 (65, 88) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Robeson County 6 Rural 10.2 (7.9, 13.0) 85 (32, 89) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Durham County 6 Urban 10.4 (8.9, 12.1) 84 (49, 89) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 10.5 (7.8, 14.0) 83 (21, 89) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 4.0)
Transylvania County 6 Rural 10.6 (7.2, 15.5) 82 (10, 89) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 3.1)
Watauga County 6 Rural 10.7 (7.3, 15.3) 81 (13, 89) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.5)
Yancey County 6 Rural 11.1 (6.2, 19.0) 80 (2, 89) 3
*
*
Sampson County 6 Rural 11.1 (8.0, 15.1) 79 (9, 89) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.1)
Franklin County 6 Urban 11.2 (8.2, 14.9) 78 (11, 89) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 3.1)
Wake County 6 Urban 11.2 (10.3, 12.1) 77 (53, 85) 129 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.7)
Pitt County 6 Urban 11.2 (9.1, 13.7) 76 (24, 88) 21 falling falling trend -3.5 (-12.6, -1.2)
Chatham County 6 Urban 11.4 (8.7, 14.9) 75 (13, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.3)
Ashe County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.2, 18.5) 74 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.9, 5.6)
Union County 6 Urban 11.8 (10.0, 13.8) 73 (25, 87) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.3)
Johnston County 6 Urban 11.9 (9.9, 14.1) 72 (20, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.6)
Duplin County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.3, 16.6) 71 (5, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.6)
Bertie County 6 Rural 12.1 (6.8, 20.5) 70 (1, 89) 3
*
*
Person County 6 Urban 12.2 (8.4, 17.4) 69 (3, 89) 8 falling falling trend -6.2 (-32.6, -0.7)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 12.2 (10.6, 14.1) 68 (24, 85) 40 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Madison County 6 Urban 12.5 (7.6, 20.0) 67 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 4.3)
Alamance County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.5, 14.9) 66 (14, 86) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 12.6 (11.1, 14.1) 65 (23, 81) 59 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.1)
Henderson County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.3, 15.3) 64 (12, 87) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.6)
Orange County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.2, 15.4) 63 (11, 87) 21 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 4.0)
Guilford County 6 Urban 12.6 (11.4, 13.9) 62 (27, 78) 79 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Davidson County 6 Urban 12.7 (10.7, 15.1) 61 (15, 85) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Nash County 6 Urban 12.9 (10.1, 16.2) 60 (8, 88) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.6)
Mitchell County 6 Rural 12.9 (6.9, 22.8) 59 (1, 89) 3
*
*
Dare County 6 Rural 13.0 (9.2, 18.2) 58 (3, 89) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.7, 7.2)
Wilson County 6 Rural 13.0 (10.0, 16.6) 57 (5, 88) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Pasquotank County 6 Rural 13.1 (8.9, 18.8) 56 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.5, 6.8)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.4, 20.0) 55 (1, 89) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.1)
Gaston County 6 Urban 13.2 (11.3, 15.3) 54 (15, 80) 38 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.2)
Haywood County 6 Rural 13.2 (10.2, 17.1) 53 (5, 87) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.6)
Lee County 6 Rural 13.2 (9.8, 17.6) 52 (3, 89) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.2)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 13.3 (11.3, 15.5) 51 (11, 82) 33 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 4.2)
Stokes County 6 Urban 13.3 (9.3, 18.6) 50 (2, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.3, 5.3)
Catawba County 6 Urban 13.5 (11.3, 16.0) 49 (9, 83) 29 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 5.2)
New Hanover County 6 Urban 13.5 (11.6, 15.6) 48 (12, 79) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.7)
Moore County 6 Urban 13.5 (10.9, 16.7) 47 (5, 86) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.1)
Bladen County 6 Rural 13.6 (8.8, 20.3) 46 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend -36.9 (-60.8, 1.5)
Polk County 6 Rural 13.6 (8.1, 22.3) 45 (1, 89) 5
*
*
Randolph County 6 Urban 13.7 (11.4, 16.4) 44 (7, 83) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Columbus County 6 Rural 13.8 (10.0, 18.6) 43 (2, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.6)
Wayne County 6 Urban 13.8 (11.2, 16.9) 42 (5, 84) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.5)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 13.8 (12.2, 15.7) 41 (10, 73) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Yadkin County 6 Urban 13.9 (9.9, 19.3) 40 (2, 89) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.7)
Surry County 6 Rural 13.9 (10.9, 17.7) 39 (4, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.5)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 13.9 (11.0, 17.6) 38 (4, 86) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.7)
Craven County 6 Rural 14.0 (11.2, 17.3) 37 (4, 83) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.7)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 14.0 (10.8, 18.0) 36 (4, 86) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.1)
Beaufort County 6 Rural 14.0 (10.2, 19.1) 35 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 14.1 (9.7, 20.1) 34 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.1, 8.0)
Granville County 6 Rural 14.2 (10.6, 18.8) 33 (2, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.0)
Rowan County 6 Urban 14.3 (11.9, 17.1) 32 (5, 78) 27 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.0, 6.0)
Alexander County 6 Urban 14.3 (10.0, 20.2) 31 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.0, 9.0)
Caswell County 6 Rural 14.4 (9.2, 21.9) 30 (1, 89) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.6, 3.7)
Warren County 6 Rural 14.4 (8.7, 23.2) 29 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.3, 6.3)
Davie County 6 Urban 14.5 (10.7, 19.6) 28 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 5.3)
Greene County 6 Rural 14.5 (8.6, 23.4) 27 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.5, 5.4)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 14.6 (11.5, 18.2) 26 (3, 83) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.9)
Pender County 6 Urban 14.6 (10.9, 19.2) 25 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Edgecombe County 6 Urban 14.6 (10.6, 19.6) 24 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.9)
Harnett County 6 Rural 14.6 (11.9, 17.8) 23 (3, 80) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.6)
Northampton County 6 Rural 14.9 (9.2, 23.8) 22 (1, 89) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.4, 6.6)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 15.1 (10.5, 21.6) 21 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend -3.6 (-25.5, 3.5)
Iredell County 6 Urban 15.2 (13.0, 17.7) 20 (4, 70) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 15.3 (12.8, 18.1) 19 (3, 70) 38 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.1, 4.7)
Stanly County 6 Rural 15.3 (11.8, 19.6) 18 (1, 84) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 6.0)
Lenoir County 6 Rural 15.4 (11.6, 20.2) 17 (1, 85) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.6)
Avery County 6 Rural 15.5 (9.5, 24.7) 16 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.3)
Halifax County 6 Rural 15.5 (11.5, 20.6) 15 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.1)
Currituck County 6 Urban 15.9 (10.4, 23.4) 14 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.2, 13.4)
Pamlico County 6 Rural 16.1 (8.5, 28.9) 13 (1, 89) 3
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural 16.5 (11.2, 23.5) 12 (1, 88) 7
*
*
Onslow County 6 Urban 16.5 (13.7, 19.7) 11 (1, 64) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.3)
Burke County 6 Urban 16.6 (13.6, 20.2) 10 (1, 67) 22 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.1)
Carteret County 6 Rural 16.7 (13.3, 20.9) 9 (1, 70) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.4)
Macon County 6 Rural 16.7 (12.2, 22.8) 8 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 9.0)
Perquimans County 6 Rural 16.8 (9.5, 28.6) 7 (1, 89) 4
*
*
Cleveland County 6 Rural 16.9 (13.8, 20.6) 6 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.2)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 17.0 (13.8, 20.7) 5 (1, 63) 22 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 6.3)
Richmond County 6 Rural 17.4 (12.8, 23.3) 4 (1, 82) 10 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.8, 9.2)
Anson County 6 Urban 17.9 (11.3, 27.1) 3 (1, 89) 5
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural 19.7 (15.0, 25.6) 2 (1, 60) 13 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.6, 8.4)
Swain County 6 Rural 20.4 (11.9, 32.9) 1 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-8.3, 8.4)
Alleghany County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 11:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Chowan, Clay, Gates, Graham, Hertford, Hyde, Jones, Tyrrell, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top