Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County
Stomach (Late Stage^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Percent of Cases with Late Stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | N/A | 3.5 (3.3, 3.6) | N/A | 436 | 55.4 |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 3.5 (3.5, 3.6) | N/A | 13,787 | 55.7 |
Wilson County 6 | Rural | 3.8 (2.3, 6.1) | 14 (1, 44) | 4 | 52.6 |
Wayne County 6 | Urban | 5.0 (3.4, 7.1) | 4 (1, 36) | 7 | 61.8 |
Wake County 6 | Urban | 3.6 (3.1, 4.2) | 18 (9, 34) | 41 | 54.3 |
Union County 6 | Urban | 3.5 (2.5, 4.7) | 25 (5, 43) | 9 | 62.9 |
Surry County 6 | Rural | 3.0 (1.7, 5.2) | 32 (4, 44) | 3 | 57.1 |
Sampson County 6 | Rural | 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) | 1 (1, 38) | 5 | 63.9 |
Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 5.5 (3.5, 8.4) | 3 (1, 38) | 5 | 59.1 |
Rowan County 6 | Urban | 2.6 (1.6, 3.9) | 41 (11, 44) | 5 | 46.3 |
Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 3.6 (2.4, 5.5) | 19 (3, 44) | 5 | 67.5 |
Robeson County 6 | Rural | 4.7 (3.1, 6.9) | 8 (1, 40) | 6 | 55.8 |
Randolph County 6 | Urban | 2.8 (1.8, 4.2) | 38 (8, 44) | 5 | 54.0 |
Pitt County 6 | Urban | 3.7 (2.5, 5.2) | 17 (3, 44) | 7 | 58.6 |
Orange County 6 | Urban | 2.4 (1.4, 3.8) | 43 (11, 44) | 4 | 47.5 |
Onslow County 6 | Urban | 3.1 (2.0, 4.7) | 30 (4, 44) | 5 | 46.0 |
New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 2.6 (1.8, 3.6) | 40 (14, 44) | 8 | 54.9 |
Nash County 6 | Urban | 4.4 (2.8, 6.7) | 11 (1, 43) | 5 | 70.3 |
Moore County 6 | Urban | 2.3 (1.3, 3.8) | 44 (11, 44) | 3 | 39.5 |
Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 3.5 (3.0, 4.1) | 23 (9, 36) | 38 | 58.2 |
Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 3.2 (1.8, 5.3) | 28 (3, 44) | 3 | 50.0 |
Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 4.8 (2.7, 8.0) | 6 (1, 44) | 3 | 58.6 |
Johnston County 6 | Urban | 4.7 (3.5, 6.2) | 9 (1, 33) | 11 | 58.7 |
Iredell County 6 | Urban | 3.1 (2.1, 4.3) | 31 (7, 44) | 7 | 49.3 |
Henderson County 6 | Urban | 2.9 (1.8, 4.5) | 35 (6, 44) | 5 | 47.3 |
Harnett County 6 | Rural | 3.8 (2.5, 5.6) | 15 (2, 44) | 5 | 50.0 |
Halifax County 6 | Rural | 4.5 (2.5, 7.6) | 10 (1, 44) | 3 | 61.5 |
Guilford County 6 | Urban | 3.6 (2.9, 4.3) | 21 (7, 38) | 22 | 50.2 |
Granville County 6 | Rural | 4.1 (2.3, 6.8) | 12 (1, 44) | 3 | 63.0 |
Gaston County 6 | Urban | 3.5 (2.6, 4.7) | 24 (5, 43) | 10 | 62.0 |
Franklin County 6 | Urban | 5.0 (2.9, 8.0) | 5 (1, 43) | 4 | 54.3 |
Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 3.5 (2.8, 4.4) | 22 (6, 39) | 17 | 61.9 |
Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 5.9 (3.4, 9.6) | 2 (1, 41) | 4 | 59.4 |
Durham County 6 | Urban | 4.8 (3.8, 6.0) | 7 (1, 29) | 16 | 61.7 |
Davidson County 6 | Urban | 3.7 (2.7, 5.1) | 16 (3, 42) | 9 | 68.3 |
Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 3.4 (2.5, 4.4) | 27 (6, 43) | 11 | 43.9 |
Craven County 6 | Rural | 3.6 (2.3, 5.6) | 20 (2, 44) | 5 | 51.1 |
Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 4.0 (2.6, 6.0) | 13 (1, 43) | 5 | 64.3 |
Chatham County 6 | Urban | 2.9 (1.7, 4.7) | 37 (6, 44) | 4 | 54.1 |
Catawba County 6 | Urban | 3.5 (2.4, 4.9) | 26 (3, 44) | 7 | 58.6 |
Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 2.8 (1.6, 4.6) | 39 (6, 44) | 4 | 66.7 |
Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 2.9 (2.0, 4.1) | 36 (8, 44) | 7 | 46.5 |
Burke County 6 | Urban | 3.2 (1.8, 5.1) | 29 (3, 44) | 4 | 54.3 |
Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 2.5 (1.8, 3.4) | 42 (19, 44) | 9 | 56.8 |
Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 3.0 (1.9, 4.5) | 33 (6, 44) | 7 | 61.4 |
Alamance County 6 | Urban | 3.0 (2.0, 4.3) | 34 (7, 44) | 6 | 52.6 |
Alexander County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Anson County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Ashe County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Avery County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Beaufort County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Bertie County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Bladen County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Carteret County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Caswell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Cherokee County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Chowan County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Clay County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Columbus County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Currituck County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Dare County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Davie County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Duplin County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Greene County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Haywood County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Hertford County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Hoke County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Jackson County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Jones County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Lee County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Macon County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Madison County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Martin County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
McDowell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Mitchell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Montgomery County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Northampton County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Pasquotank County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Pender County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Person County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Polk County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Richmond County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Scotland County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Stanly County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Stokes County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Swain County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Transylvania County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Vance County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Warren County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Watauga County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Wilkes County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Yadkin County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
Yancey County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 8:29 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Columbus, Currituck, Dare, Davie, Duplin, Gates, Graham, Greene, Haywood, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Lee, Macon, Madison, Martin, McDowell, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Person, Polk, Richmond, Scotland, Stanly, Stokes, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin, Yancey
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.
^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 8:29 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Columbus, Currituck, Dare, Davie, Duplin, Gates, Graham, Greene, Haywood, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Lee, Macon, Madison, Martin, McDowell, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Person, Polk, Richmond, Scotland, Stanly, Stokes, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin, Yancey
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.
^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.