Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Percent of Cases with Late Stage |
---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 62.1 (60.9, 63.3) | N/A | 2,279 | 60.3 |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 63.9 (63.7, 64.1) | N/A | 70,926 | 58.4 |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 58.2 (54.3, 62.4) | 64 (41, 80) | 171 | 59.0 |
Wake County 6 | 52.6 (48.9, 56.5) | 83 (57, 88) | 157 | 62.6 |
Guilford County 6 | 56.7 (51.8, 61.9) | 69 (42, 85) | 103 | 59.6 |
Forsyth County 6 | 62.3 (56.3, 68.6) | 51 (23, 78) | 83 | 66.2 |
Buncombe County 6 | 68.2 (61.2, 75.8) | 34 (10, 69) | 72 | 68.6 |
Gaston County 6 | 77.7 (69.1, 87.1) | 11 (3, 47) | 61 | 62.4 |
Durham County 6 | 59.5 (52.6, 67.2) | 58 (23, 86) | 55 | 63.9 |
Cumberland County 6 | 56.2 (49.4, 63.7) | 72 (30, 88) | 51 | 56.8 |
Davidson County 6 | 76.6 (67.3, 86.8) | 12 (3, 56) | 50 | 68.1 |
Brunswick County 6 | 65.1 (56.5, 74.7) | 43 (10, 81) | 49 | 59.8 |
Union County 6 | 64.2 (56.0, 73.4) | 45 (13, 82) | 46 | 57.9 |
New Hanover County 6 | 48.8 (42.3, 56.0) | 86 (56, 93) | 42 | 63.4 |
Cabarrus County 6 | 62.2 (53.7, 71.6) | 53 (15, 84) | 40 | 52.4 |
Alamance County 6 | 64.4 (55.6, 74.1) | 44 (13, 82) | 39 | 55.8 |
Johnston County 6 | 59.5 (51.0, 69.0) | 59 (17, 87) | 37 | 56.9 |
Randolph County 6 | 66.5 (57.2, 76.9) | 39 (8, 80) | 37 | 59.4 |
Iredell County 6 | 54.5 (46.5, 63.4) | 76 (34, 91) | 34 | 51.5 |
Wayne County 6 | 75.7 (64.6, 88.1) | 15 (3, 62) | 34 | 63.4 |
Catawba County 6 | 55.4 (47.3, 64.6) | 74 (29, 91) | 34 | 58.9 |
Robeson County 6 | 76.6 (65.2, 89.4) | 13 (2, 65) | 34 | 65.1 |
Rowan County 6 | 62.8 (53.5, 73.2) | 49 (11, 86) | 34 | 56.9 |
Henderson County 6 | 53.9 (45.3, 63.5) | 78 (30, 92) | 30 | 56.6 |
Rockingham County 6 | 76.0 (64.2, 89.4) | 14 (3, 66) | 30 | 61.5 |
Caldwell County 6 | 82.1 (69.0, 97.0) | 7 (2, 56) | 29 | 61.9 |
Cleveland County 6 | 72.1 (60.6, 85.1) | 24 (3, 75) | 29 | 51.3 |
Burke County 6 | 72.5 (61.0, 85.6) | 21 (3, 74) | 28 | 63.1 |
Moore County 6 | 60.6 (50.7, 71.8) | 55 (15, 89) | 28 | 64.1 |
Onslow County 6 | 65.5 (54.7, 77.8) | 42 (6, 84) | 27 | 57.0 |
Carteret County 6 | 74.3 (61.8, 88.6) | 17 (2, 77) | 26 | 65.2 |
Pitt County 6 | 48.7 (40.5, 58.1) | 87 (47, 93) | 26 | 53.5 |
Craven County 6 | 62.2 (51.5, 74.4) | 52 (11, 88) | 25 | 59.3 |
Orange County 6 | 54.0 (44.6, 64.8) | 77 (27, 92) | 24 | 63.2 |
Harnett County 6 | 62.9 (51.7, 75.7) | 48 (9, 87) | 23 | 58.3 |
Lincoln County 6 | 67.4 (55.4, 81.2) | 38 (4, 85) | 23 | 58.7 |
Wilkes County 6 | 72.1 (59.2, 87.1) | 23 (3, 80) | 22 | 66.9 |
Chatham County 6 | 61.1 (49.9, 74.1) | 54 (9, 89) | 22 | 62.8 |
Granville County 6 | 92.9 (75.8, 112.7) | 2 (1, 43) | 21 | 67.5 |
Surry County 6 | 67.7 (55.3, 82.2) | 37 (5, 86) | 21 | 61.8 |
Nash County 6 | 56.3 (45.8, 68.4) | 71 (21, 92) | 21 | 63.2 |
Rutherford County 6 | 68.5 (55.6, 83.4) | 33 (4, 85) | 20 | 53.7 |
Haywood County 6 | 68.0 (54.9, 83.4) | 36 (3, 86) | 20 | 60.1 |
Wilson County 6 | 59.2 (47.5, 72.8) | 61 (11, 91) | 18 | 57.9 |
McDowell County 6 | 89.7 (71.8, 110.8) | 3 (1, 59) | 18 | 64.5 |
Sampson County 6 | 70.6 (56.5, 87.2) | 28 (2, 85) | 18 | 73.3 |
Duplin County 6 | 73.5 (58.5, 91.3) | 18 (2, 83) | 17 | 66.4 |
Columbus County 6 | 71.9 (56.8, 89.7) | 25 (2, 86) | 16 | 60.4 |
Halifax County 6 | 72.6 (57.3, 90.8) | 20 (2, 87) | 16 | 59.3 |
Lenoir County 6 | 68.9 (54.2, 86.2) | 30 (3, 87) | 16 | 58.1 |
Franklin County 6 | 59.9 (46.9, 75.4) | 56 (6, 92) | 15 | 55.9 |
Stokes County 6 | 70.9 (55.3, 89.6) | 26 (2, 88) | 14 | 70.6 |
Edgecombe County 6 | 62.6 (48.4, 79.7) | 50 (5, 92) | 14 | 59.5 |
Davie County 6 | 73.2 (56.7, 93.0) | 19 (2, 85) | 14 | 61.8 |
Macon County 6 | 68.7 (52.8, 88.0) | 31 (2, 90) | 13 | 66.3 |
Stanly County 6 | 53.3 (41.2, 67.9) | 80 (20, 93) | 13 | 47.2 |
Lee County 6 | 57.2 (44.1, 73.1) | 66 (9, 92) | 13 | 54.1 |
Beaufort County 6 | 57.1 (43.6, 73.6) | 67 (9, 93) | 13 | 56.8 |
Jackson County 6 | 74.3 (56.5, 95.9) | 16 (2, 87) | 12 | 64.6 |
Cherokee County 6 | 80.1 (60.2, 104.3) | 8 (1, 85) | 12 | 55.0 |
Richmond County 6 | 69.1 (52.5, 89.3) | 29 (2, 89) | 12 | 65.2 |
Vance County 6 | 68.5 (52.0, 88.6) | 32 (2, 90) | 12 | 55.6 |
Pender County 6 | 45.8 (34.4, 59.8) | 89 (34, 93) | 11 | 51.9 |
Person County 6 | 68.1 (51.2, 88.8) | 35 (2, 92) | 11 | 62.2 |
Transylvania County 6 | 55.8 (41.3, 73.9) | 73 (9, 93) | 11 | 75.0 |
Alexander County 6 | 66.4 (49.6, 87.1) | 40 (3, 92) | 11 | 60.2 |
Bladen County 6 | 66.2 (48.5, 88.2) | 41 (3, 92) | 10 | 62.8 |
Dare County 6 | 53.0 (38.1, 71.8) | 81 (10, 93) | 9 | 66.7 |
Pasquotank County 6 | 63.2 (46.0, 84.7) | 47 (3, 93) | 9 | 59.7 |
Scotland County 6 | 70.6 (51.4, 94.6) | 27 (2, 91) | 9 | 61.3 |
Yadkin County 6 | 56.7 (41.3, 76.0) | 68 (6, 93) | 9 | 67.2 |
Anson County 6 | 87.8 (63.1, 118.9) | 4 (1, 85) | 9 | 68.3 |
Caswell County 6 | 85.5 (61.4, 115.9) | 6 (1, 85) | 9 | 71.7 |
Montgomery County 6 | 72.5 (51.7, 98.9) | 22 (2, 91) | 8 | 69.5 |
Watauga County 6 | 44.5 (31.7, 60.7) | 90 (34, 93) | 8 | 56.9 |
Polk County 6 | 64.0 (45.5, 87.6) | 46 (2, 93) | 8 | 71.4 |
Hoke County 6 | 54.8 (38.2, 76.4) | 75 (6, 93) | 8 | 61.9 |
Swain County 6 | 138.9 (96.9, 192.6) | 1 (1, 31) | 7 | 62.7 |
Bertie County 6 | 78.8 (54.6, 110.1) | 10 (1, 91) | 7 | 59.0 |
Ashe County 6 | 48.7 (33.3, 68.7) | 88 (12, 93) | 7 | 65.4 |
Hertford County 6 | 56.6 (38.3, 80.8) | 70 (4, 93) | 6 | 46.3 |
Martin County 6 | 59.7 (39.8, 85.8) | 57 (2, 93) | 6 | 44.8 |
Northampton County 6 | 58.7 (39.1, 84.6) | 63 (3, 93) | 6 | 60.0 |
Chowan County 6 | 79.5 (53.0, 115.0) | 9 (1, 92) | 6 | 67.4 |
Yancey County 6 | 59.4 (39.6, 86.1) | 60 (3, 93) | 6 | 64.4 |
Warren County 6 | 59.0 (38.3, 86.7) | 62 (2, 93) | 6 | 60.9 |
Washington County 6 | 87.6 (56.9, 129.4) | 5 (1, 92) | 5 | 61.4 |
Madison County 6 | 53.4 (34.5, 79.0) | 79 (4, 93) | 5 | 63.4 |
Currituck County 6 | 44.3 (27.5, 67.7) | 91 (14, 93) | 5 | 60.5 |
Mitchell County 6 | 49.1 (29.3, 77.4) | 85 (4, 93) | 4 | 48.7 |
Perquimans County 6 | 51.4 (30.5, 81.6) | 84 (3, 93) | 4 | 51.4 |
Alleghany County 6 | 57.5 (32.6, 93.7) | 65 (2, 93) | 3 | 65.4 |
Avery County 6 | 43.3 (25.1, 69.7) | 92 (11, 93) | 3 | 53.1 |
Clay County 6 | 52.6 (29.5, 86.9) | 82 (2, 93) | 3 | 56.7 |
Greene County 6 | 43.0 (24.6, 69.7) | 93 (10, 93) | 3 | 54.8 |
Camden County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Gates County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Jones County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County 6 |
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2024 11:28 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Camden, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Pamlico, Tyrrell
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.
^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2024 11:28 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Camden, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Pamlico, Tyrrell
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.
^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.