Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 9.0 (8.7, 9.2) N/A 1,215 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Yancey County 6 Rural 11.0 (6.5, 18.4) 17 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Yadkin County 6 Urban 8.2 (5.3, 12.6) 54 (5, 79) 5 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.1, 13.4)
Wilson County 6 Rural 10.5 (8.0, 13.7) 23 (3, 73) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.5, 6.3)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 10.1 (7.6, 13.4) 26 (4, 74) 11 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.1, 8.5)
Wayne County 6 Urban 11.7 (9.3, 14.5) 11 (3, 61) 17 rising rising trend 7.3 (4.6, 11.0)
Watauga County 6 Rural 5.8 (3.5, 9.5) 79 (22, 79) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 10.1)
Wake County 6 Urban 8.3 (7.5, 9.1) 53 (32, 68) 94 stable stable trend 2.1 (-5.9, 5.3)
Vance County 6 Rural 11.3 (7.8, 16.0) 16 (1, 75) 7
*
*
Union County 6 Urban 7.7 (6.2, 9.4) 59 (25, 78) 20 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.9, 9.2)
Transylvania County 6 Rural 7.2 (3.8, 12.5) 68 (5, 79) 4
*
*
Surry County 6 Rural 6.6 (4.6, 9.4) 75 (23, 79) 7 stable stable trend 19.8 (-11.0, 48.0)
Stokes County 6 Urban 10.4 (7.3, 14.6) 25 (2, 77) 8 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.9, 11.2)
Stanly County 6 Rural 12.7 (9.5, 16.7) 8 (1, 62) 11 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.7, 11.9)
Scotland County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.9, 18.9) 5 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Sampson County 6 Rural 8.9 (6.1, 12.6) 47 (5, 79) 7 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.1, 14.5)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 12.1 (9.2, 15.7) 10 (2, 63) 13
*
*
Rowan County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.1, 11.2) 44 (11, 74) 17 stable stable trend -17.0 (-33.8, 1.7)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 9.0 (6.9, 11.6) 46 (8, 76) 13 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.0, 1.4)
Robeson County 6 Rural 9.6 (7.5, 12.2) 33 (6, 75) 14 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.0, 9.5)
Richmond County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.9, 13.6) 41 (4, 79) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.6, 7.8)
Randolph County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.8, 13.1) 20 (4, 60) 22 rising rising trend 6.1 (4.0, 9.1)
Pitt County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 8.8) 73 (29, 79) 14 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.8)
Person County 6 Urban 7.5 (4.6, 11.8) 64 (6, 79) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.5, 11.9)
Pender County 6 Urban 9.7 (6.9, 13.3) 30 (3, 77) 9 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 8.2)
Pamlico County 6 Rural 20.9 (11.5, 36.0) 1 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Orange County 6 Urban 7.7 (5.9, 9.9) 58 (16, 79) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 9.3)
Onslow County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.5, 13.5) 19 (4, 65) 16 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.6, 5.7)
Northampton County 6 Rural 10.5 (5.9, 18.4) 22 (1, 79) 3
*
*
New Hanover County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.2, 9.1) 63 (28, 78) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-15.4, 2.5)
Nash County 6 Urban 9.9 (7.5, 12.8) 27 (4, 74) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.3)
Moore County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 9.1) 72 (28, 79) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 7.0)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.7, 15.5) 34 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 9.4 (8.6, 10.2) 37 (19, 56) 105 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.7, 3.4)
McDowell County 6 Rural 15.0 (11.1, 19.9) 4 (1, 46) 11
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.7, 16.1) 31 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.7, 11.0) 67 (12, 79) 6 falling falling trend -33.2 (-52.8, -13.9)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 10.7 (8.3, 13.8) 21 (3, 71) 13 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.9, 11.1)
Lenoir County 6 Rural 7.5 (5.0, 11.0) 65 (11, 79) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 7.8)
Lee County 6 Rural 9.5 (6.6, 13.2) 35 (3, 78) 8 falling falling trend -25.3 (-44.4, -4.1)
Johnston County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.3, 10.9) 45 (12, 73) 22 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 7.2)
Jackson County 6 Rural 9.7 (6.4, 14.4) 28 (3, 79) 6 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.4, 13.4)
Iredell County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.1, 9.4) 60 (24, 78) 19 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 6.8)
Hoke County 6 Urban 7.8 (4.4, 12.5) 57 (4, 79) 4
*
*
Hertford County 6 Rural 11.4 (6.5, 19.0) 14 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Henderson County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.0, 8.7) 76 (30, 79) 13 stable stable trend -4.2 (-11.6, 0.9)
Haywood County 6 Rural 12.1 (9.2, 15.8) 9 (2, 64) 13 rising rising trend 7.2 (5.0, 10.4)
Harnett County 6 Rural 8.5 (6.5, 10.9) 51 (12, 77) 13 stable stable trend -7.0 (-20.0, 0.5)
Halifax County 6 Rural 11.5 (8.2, 15.9) 13 (2, 74) 9 stable stable trend -8.9 (-24.1, 6.4)
Guilford County 6 Urban 8.2 (7.2, 9.3) 55 (29, 71) 53 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Greene County 6 Rural 17.7 (11.3, 26.8) 2 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Granville County 6 Rural 12.7 (9.5, 16.7) 7 (1, 61) 11 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.9, 9.1)
Gaston County 6 Urban 13.1 (11.3, 15.1) 6 (2, 28) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.5, 3.0)
Franklin County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.7, 12.7) 38 (6, 78) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.0, 7.2)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 8.4 (7.3, 9.7) 52 (23, 71) 41 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 6.3)
Edgecombe County 6 Urban 9.1 (6.3, 12.9) 43 (4, 79) 7 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.9, 7.3)
Durham County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.7, 10.7) 42 (15, 69) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-13.0, 3.4)
Duplin County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) 77 (19, 79) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.6, 9.2)
Davie County 6 Urban 7.1 (4.5, 10.9) 71 (10, 79) 5
*
*
Davidson County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.2, 10.7) 49 (14, 75) 22 stable stable trend -2.3 (-16.5, 3.7)
Dare County 6 Rural 7.6 (4.8, 11.8) 62 (7, 79) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 6.7)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.3, 9.0) 61 (29, 77) 27 stable stable trend -8.2 (-26.3, 1.3)
Craven County 6 Rural 9.4 (7.1, 12.2) 36 (6, 75) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.9)
Columbus County 6 Rural 9.6 (6.6, 13.7) 32 (3, 79) 7
*
*
Cleveland County 6 Rural 9.7 (7.5, 12.4) 29 (5, 73) 14 rising rising trend 7.6 (4.1, 12.8)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 7.1 (3.9, 12.6) 70 (5, 79) 4
*
*
Chatham County 6 Urban 5.9 (4.2, 8.2) 78 (39, 79) 8 stable stable trend -19.9 (-48.3, 6.8)
Catawba County 6 Urban 7.5 (6.0, 9.4) 66 (23, 78) 17 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.6, 9.7)
Carteret County 6 Rural 9.2 (6.8, 12.3) 40 (5, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.2, 6.9)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 9.2 (6.9, 12.1) 39 (6, 77) 11 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.7)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 8.9 (7.2, 10.7) 48 (13, 73) 22 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 6.3)
Burke County 6 Urban 11.4 (9.0, 14.5) 15 (2, 63) 15 rising rising trend 7.4 (5.0, 11.1)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 10.9 (9.4, 12.5) 18 (6, 49) 44 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.8, 6.5)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.1, 10.8) 50 (14, 73) 26 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.4, 10.6)
Bladen County 6 Rural 7.1 (4.2, 11.8) 69 (7, 79) 4
*
*
Beaufort County 6 Rural 8.1 (5.5, 11.8) 56 (7, 79) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.1, 11.3)
Ashe County 6 Rural 10.4 (6.7, 16.2) 24 (2, 79) 5
*
*
Anson County 6 Urban 15.1 (9.1, 23.7) 3 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Alexander County 6 Urban 6.7 (4.0, 11.0) 74 (11, 79) 4
*
*
Alamance County 6 Urban 11.6 (9.7, 13.8) 12 (3, 50) 27 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.3, 8.1)
Alleghany County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 6:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Avery, Bertie, Camden, Caswell, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Madison, Mitchell, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Polk, Swain, Tyrrell, Warren, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top