Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 9.0 (8.7, 9.2) N/A 1,215 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Watauga County 6 Rural 5.8 (3.5, 9.5) 79 (22, 79) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 10.1)
Chatham County 6 Urban 5.9 (4.2, 8.2) 78 (39, 79) 8 stable stable trend -19.9 (-48.3, 6.8)
Duplin County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) 77 (19, 79) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.6, 9.2)
Henderson County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.0, 8.7) 76 (30, 79) 13 stable stable trend -4.2 (-11.6, 0.9)
Surry County 6 Rural 6.6 (4.6, 9.4) 75 (23, 79) 7 stable stable trend 19.8 (-11.0, 48.0)
Alexander County 6 Urban 6.7 (4.0, 11.0) 74 (11, 79) 4
*
*
Pitt County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 8.8) 73 (29, 79) 14 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.8)
Moore County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 9.1) 72 (28, 79) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 7.0)
Davie County 6 Urban 7.1 (4.5, 10.9) 71 (10, 79) 5
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural 7.1 (3.9, 12.6) 70 (5, 79) 4
*
*
Bladen County 6 Rural 7.1 (4.2, 11.8) 69 (7, 79) 4
*
*
Transylvania County 6 Rural 7.2 (3.8, 12.5) 68 (5, 79) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.7, 11.0) 67 (12, 79) 6 falling falling trend -33.2 (-52.8, -13.9)
Catawba County 6 Urban 7.5 (6.0, 9.4) 66 (23, 78) 17 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.6, 9.7)
Lenoir County 6 Rural 7.5 (5.0, 11.0) 65 (11, 79) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 7.8)
Person County 6 Urban 7.5 (4.6, 11.8) 64 (6, 79) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.5, 11.9)
New Hanover County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.2, 9.1) 63 (28, 78) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-15.4, 2.5)
Dare County 6 Rural 7.6 (4.8, 11.8) 62 (7, 79) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 6.7)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.3, 9.0) 61 (29, 77) 27 stable stable trend -8.2 (-26.3, 1.3)
Iredell County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.1, 9.4) 60 (24, 78) 19 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 6.8)
Union County 6 Urban 7.7 (6.2, 9.4) 59 (25, 78) 20 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.9, 9.2)
Orange County 6 Urban 7.7 (5.9, 9.9) 58 (16, 79) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 9.3)
Hoke County 6 Urban 7.8 (4.4, 12.5) 57 (4, 79) 4
*
*
Beaufort County 6 Rural 8.1 (5.5, 11.8) 56 (7, 79) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.1, 11.3)
Guilford County 6 Urban 8.2 (7.2, 9.3) 55 (29, 71) 53 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Yadkin County 6 Urban 8.2 (5.3, 12.6) 54 (5, 79) 5 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.1, 13.4)
Wake County 6 Urban 8.3 (7.5, 9.1) 53 (32, 68) 94 stable stable trend 2.1 (-5.9, 5.3)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 8.4 (7.3, 9.7) 52 (23, 71) 41 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 6.3)
Harnett County 6 Rural 8.5 (6.5, 10.9) 51 (12, 77) 13 stable stable trend -7.0 (-20.0, 0.5)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.1, 10.8) 50 (14, 73) 26 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.4, 10.6)
Davidson County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.2, 10.7) 49 (14, 75) 22 stable stable trend -2.3 (-16.5, 3.7)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 8.9 (7.2, 10.7) 48 (13, 73) 22 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 6.3)
Sampson County 6 Rural 8.9 (6.1, 12.6) 47 (5, 79) 7 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.1, 14.5)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 9.0 (6.9, 11.6) 46 (8, 76) 13 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.0, 1.4)
Johnston County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.3, 10.9) 45 (12, 73) 22 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 7.2)
Rowan County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.1, 11.2) 44 (11, 74) 17 stable stable trend -17.0 (-33.8, 1.7)
Edgecombe County 6 Urban 9.1 (6.3, 12.9) 43 (4, 79) 7 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.9, 7.3)
Durham County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.7, 10.7) 42 (15, 69) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-13.0, 3.4)
Richmond County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.9, 13.6) 41 (4, 79) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.6, 7.8)
Carteret County 6 Rural 9.2 (6.8, 12.3) 40 (5, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.2, 6.9)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 9.2 (6.9, 12.1) 39 (6, 77) 11 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.7)
Franklin County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.7, 12.7) 38 (6, 78) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.0, 7.2)
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 9.4 (8.6, 10.2) 37 (19, 56) 105 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.7, 3.4)
Craven County 6 Rural 9.4 (7.1, 12.2) 36 (6, 75) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.9)
Lee County 6 Rural 9.5 (6.6, 13.2) 35 (3, 78) 8 falling falling trend -25.3 (-44.4, -4.1)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.7, 15.5) 34 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Robeson County 6 Rural 9.6 (7.5, 12.2) 33 (6, 75) 14 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.0, 9.5)
Columbus County 6 Rural 9.6 (6.6, 13.7) 32 (3, 79) 7
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.7, 16.1) 31 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Pender County 6 Urban 9.7 (6.9, 13.3) 30 (3, 77) 9 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 8.2)
Cleveland County 6 Rural 9.7 (7.5, 12.4) 29 (5, 73) 14 rising rising trend 7.6 (4.1, 12.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 9.7 (6.4, 14.4) 28 (3, 79) 6 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.4, 13.4)
Nash County 6 Urban 9.9 (7.5, 12.8) 27 (4, 74) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.3)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 10.1 (7.6, 13.4) 26 (4, 74) 11 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.1, 8.5)
Stokes County 6 Urban 10.4 (7.3, 14.6) 25 (2, 77) 8 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.9, 11.2)
Ashe County 6 Rural 10.4 (6.7, 16.2) 24 (2, 79) 5
*
*
Wilson County 6 Rural 10.5 (8.0, 13.7) 23 (3, 73) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.5, 6.3)
Northampton County 6 Rural 10.5 (5.9, 18.4) 22 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Urban 10.7 (8.3, 13.8) 21 (3, 71) 13 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.9, 11.1)
Randolph County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.8, 13.1) 20 (4, 60) 22 rising rising trend 6.1 (4.0, 9.1)
Onslow County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.5, 13.5) 19 (4, 65) 16 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.6, 5.7)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 10.9 (9.4, 12.5) 18 (6, 49) 44 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.8, 6.5)
Yancey County 6 Rural 11.0 (6.5, 18.4) 17 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Vance County 6 Rural 11.3 (7.8, 16.0) 16 (1, 75) 7
*
*
Burke County 6 Urban 11.4 (9.0, 14.5) 15 (2, 63) 15 rising rising trend 7.4 (5.0, 11.1)
Hertford County 6 Rural 11.4 (6.5, 19.0) 14 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Halifax County 6 Rural 11.5 (8.2, 15.9) 13 (2, 74) 9 stable stable trend -8.9 (-24.1, 6.4)
Alamance County 6 Urban 11.6 (9.7, 13.8) 12 (3, 50) 27 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.3, 8.1)
Wayne County 6 Urban 11.7 (9.3, 14.5) 11 (3, 61) 17 rising rising trend 7.3 (4.6, 11.0)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 12.1 (9.2, 15.7) 10 (2, 63) 13
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural 12.1 (9.2, 15.8) 9 (2, 64) 13 rising rising trend 7.2 (5.0, 10.4)
Stanly County 6 Rural 12.7 (9.5, 16.7) 8 (1, 62) 11 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.7, 11.9)
Granville County 6 Rural 12.7 (9.5, 16.7) 7 (1, 61) 11 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.9, 9.1)
Gaston County 6 Urban 13.1 (11.3, 15.1) 6 (2, 28) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.5, 3.0)
Scotland County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.9, 18.9) 5 (1, 72) 6
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural 15.0 (11.1, 19.9) 4 (1, 46) 11
*
*
Anson County 6 Urban 15.1 (9.1, 23.7) 3 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural 17.7 (11.3, 26.8) 2 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Pamlico County 6 Rural 20.9 (11.5, 36.0) 1 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Alleghany County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 3:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top