Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | 137.6 (136.3, 138.9) | N/A | 9,160 |
rising 
|
0.9 (0.7, 1.1) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) | N/A | 249,750 |
rising
|
0.5 (0.3, 0.7) |
| Tyrrell County 6 | 168.0 (98.1, 272.2) | 1 (1, 100) | 4 |
stable 
|
2.8 (-2.5, 9.3) |
| Anson County 6 | 161.8 (134.0, 194.1) | 2 (1, 80) | 27 |
stable
|
2.5 (-0.7, 6.3) |
| Jones County 6 | 160.1 (116.9, 215.4) | 3 (1, 95) | 11 |
stable
|
2.5 (-1.2, 6.7) |
| Person County 6 | 159.2 (138.0, 183.1) | 4 (1, 67) | 46 |
stable
|
2.5 (-0.2, 5.7) |
| Rowan County 6 | 155.1 (143.6, 167.3) | 5 (1, 43) | 147 |
rising
|
6.0 (3.6, 10.0) |
| Martin County 6 | 153.9 (127.5, 184.8) | 6 (1, 84) | 29 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.0, 3.8) |
| Buncombe County 6 | 153.5 (145.2, 162.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 287 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.1, 1.9) |
| Guilford County 6 | 151.5 (145.5, 157.7) | 8 (2, 33) | 507 |
rising
|
1.7 (1.0, 2.4) |
| Madison County 6 | 151.2 (124.2, 182.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 26 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.3, 4.3) |
| Mitchell County 6 | 150.8 (117.9, 191.0) | 10 (1, 94) | 18 |
stable
|
2.6 (-0.6, 6.3) |
| Henderson County 6 | 150.2 (138.5, 162.8) | 11 (1, 57) | 148 |
rising
|
1.4 (0.1, 2.8) |
| Union County 6 | 148.4 (139.2, 158.1) | 12 (2, 47) | 201 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.9, 3.0) |
| Lenoir County 6 | 148.4 (131.1, 167.5) | 13 (1, 75) | 62 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.8, 2.2) |
| Orange County 6 | 148.2 (136.5, 160.8) | 14 (2, 58) | 125 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.7, 2.4) |
| Pitt County 6 | 147.9 (137.1, 159.3) | 15 (2, 56) | 147 |
rising
|
8.6 (1.7, 14.3) |
| Bertie County 6 | 147.4 (118.0, 182.7) | 16 (1, 93) | 22 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.6, 4.1) |
| Wake County 6 | 147.4 (143.0, 151.8) | 17 (6, 36) | 892 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
| Clay County 6 | 147.0 (112.2, 191.9) | 18 (1, 95) | 15 |
stable
|
0.4 (-3.5, 4.8) |
| Carteret County 6 | 146.2 (130.9, 162.9) | 19 (1, 70) | 82 |
rising
|
4.9 (1.9, 10.8) |
| Halifax County 6 | 145.8 (127.2, 166.6) | 20 (1, 80) | 53 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
| New Hanover County 6 | 145.3 (136.6, 154.5) | 21 (3, 53) | 226 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.1, 2.6) |
| Alamance County 6 | 144.2 (133.9, 155.1) | 22 (4, 61) | 157 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.6, 1.8) |
| Chatham County 6 | 144.2 (129.8, 159.9) | 23 (2, 73) | 87 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
| Sampson County 6 | 144.0 (127.1, 162.6) | 24 (1, 79) | 59 |
rising
|
2.5 (1.4, 3.7) |
| Yancey County 6 | 143.1 (114.4, 177.6) | 25 (1, 94) | 21 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) |
| Granville County 6 | 142.7 (125.8, 161.4) | 26 (1, 80) | 56 |
stable
|
1.8 (0.0, 3.9) |
| Durham County 6 | 142.7 (134.8, 150.9) | 27 (6, 59) | 262 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-8.4, 1.3) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | 142.6 (138.3, 147.1) | 28 (12, 45) | 845 |
rising
|
0.8 (0.2, 1.6) |
| Wayne County 6 | 142.3 (130.2, 155.3) | 29 (3, 69) | 111 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.1, 2.9) |
| Johnston County 6 | 141.5 (131.9, 151.6) | 30 (4, 64) | 169 |
rising
|
3.6 (1.7, 10.1) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | 141.5 (132.1, 151.3) | 31 (5, 64) | 175 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.2, 2.7) |
| Dare County 6 | 140.6 (120.1, 163.9) | 32 (1, 89) | 39 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.3, 1.8) |
| Nash County 6 | 139.3 (126.1, 153.6) | 33 (4, 76) | 90 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.8, 2.2) |
| Onslow County 6 | 139.0 (127.4, 151.4) | 34 (5, 74) | 110 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.1, 2.5) |
| Haywood County 6 | 138.5 (122.9, 155.7) | 35 (2, 83) | 70 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.5, 3.3) |
| Forsyth County 6 | 138.3 (131.6, 145.3) | 36 (12, 63) | 339 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.3, 1.4) |
| Brunswick County 6 | 136.4 (126.1, 147.6) | 37 (8, 75) | 183 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.6, 2.2) |
| Moore County 6 | 135.3 (122.9, 148.7) | 38 (6, 78) | 104 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Craven County 6 | 135.2 (122.0, 149.4) | 39 (5, 80) | 90 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.5, 1.8) |
| Randolph County 6 | 134.3 (123.8, 145.6) | 40 (11, 78) | 131 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
| Davidson County 6 | 134.1 (124.4, 144.4) | 41 (10, 77) | 154 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.7, 2.7) |
| Iredell County 6 | 133.2 (123.6, 143.3) | 42 (13, 77) | 152 |
rising
|
1.2 (0.2, 2.5) |
| Pasquotank County 6 | 133.1 (113.0, 155.9) | 43 (2, 92) | 35 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.4, 2.9) |
| Cumberland County 6 | 132.9 (125.3, 141.0) | 44 (19, 73) | 233 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.2, 1.7) |
| Alexander County 6 | 132.9 (112.8, 155.8) | 45 (2, 92) | 35 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.4, 3.1) |
| Wilson County 6 | 132.5 (119.0, 147.2) | 46 (6, 85) | 76 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.1, 1.9) |
| Stanly County 6 | 131.9 (115.9, 149.6) | 47 (3, 89) | 55 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.5, 2.2) |
| Bladen County 6 | 131.7 (111.2, 155.4) | 48 (2, 93) | 34 |
stable
|
3.3 (-12.3, 19.2) |
| Polk County 6 | 131.6 (105.4, 163.4) | 49 (1, 97) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-4.8, 2.5) |
| McDowell County 6 | 131.4 (113.4, 151.6) | 50 (3, 92) | 44 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.9, 3.3) |
| Lincoln County 6 | 131.3 (117.9, 145.9) | 51 (6, 86) | 76 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.3, 1.8) |
| Chowan County 6 | 131.1 (99.1, 171.0) | 52 (1, 99) | 15 |
stable
|
1.3 (-2.9, 5.9) |
| Rockingham County 6 | 130.8 (118.3, 144.4) | 53 (9, 85) | 91 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.4, 2.0) |
| Gaston County 6 | 130.4 (122.0, 139.2) | 54 (19, 79) | 192 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.3, 2.3) |
| Cherokee County 6 | 129.6 (107.9, 155.1) | 55 (2, 96) | 34 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.5, 3.1) |
| Cleveland County 6 | 129.3 (117.0, 142.5) | 56 (13, 86) | 90 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
| Pender County 6 | 128.9 (113.1, 146.3) | 57 (6, 91) | 53 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.8, 3.3) |
| Macon County 6 | 128.7 (108.3, 152.3) | 58 (3, 94) | 39 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
| Beaufort County 6 | 128.4 (111.3, 147.7) | 59 (5, 93) | 49 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.4, 3.0) |
| Franklin County 6 | 128.0 (113.3, 144.2) | 60 (8, 90) | 60 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.9, 3.3) |
| Northampton County 6 | 127.5 (100.1, 160.8) | 61 (1, 97) | 20 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.2, 3.7) |
| Richmond County 6 | 127.5 (109.7, 147.7) | 62 (4, 93) | 40 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.9, 3.2) |
| Transylvania County 6 | 127.5 (108.0, 150.0) | 63 (3, 94) | 41 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.7, 3.9) |
| Davie County 6 | 126.9 (108.8, 147.5) | 64 (4, 93) | 40 |
stable
|
2.5 (0.0, 5.5) |
| Harnett County 6 | 126.6 (115.0, 139.0) | 65 (19, 88) | 91 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
| Washington County 6 | 126.0 (93.5, 167.6) | 66 (1, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.5, 2.7) |
| Caswell County 6 | 125.5 (100.9, 155.0) | 67 (2, 97) | 22 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.5, 2.9) |
| Robeson County 6 | 124.3 (113.3, 136.0) | 68 (23, 89) | 101 |
rising
|
8.1 (0.8, 16.2) |
| Vance County 6 | 123.6 (105.6, 143.9) | 69 (6, 96) | 38 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.3, 3.6) |
| Surry County 6 | 123.3 (109.9, 138.0) | 70 (17, 92) | 68 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.9, 2.9) |
| Stokes County 6 | 122.8 (105.8, 142.0) | 71 (9, 94) | 43 |
stable
|
3.1 (-1.8, 12.9) |
| Lee County 6 | 122.5 (107.0, 139.8) | 72 (14, 95) | 48 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.3, 1.8) |
| Pamlico County 6 | 122.2 (90.6, 163.6) | 73 (1, 99) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.6, 2.1) |
| Caldwell County 6 | 122.0 (109.2, 136.0) | 74 (26, 92) | 73 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.4, 2.7) |
| Greene County 6 | 121.1 (93.2, 155.0) | 75 (1, 99) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.7, 3.3) |
| Warren County 6 | 119.7 (94.8, 150.2) | 76 (2, 99) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-4.6, 2.9) |
| Catawba County 6 | 119.7 (110.3, 129.7) | 77 (41, 91) | 130 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
| Scotland County 6 | 117.3 (97.1, 140.5) | 78 (6, 97) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.7, 2.2) |
| Rutherford County 6 | 116.4 (102.9, 131.5) | 79 (30, 96) | 60 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | 116.0 (100.4, 133.4) | 80 (24, 96) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
| Burke County 6 | 115.2 (103.5, 128.1) | 81 (42, 95) | 78 |
stable
|
5.8 (-1.4, 10.9) |
| Columbus County 6 | 114.9 (99.7, 132.0) | 82 (29, 96) | 46 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.9, 3.0) |
| Hertford County 6 | 114.3 (91.6, 141.5) | 83 (7, 99) | 21 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.5, 3.2) |
| Watauga County 6 | 114.2 (97.0, 133.9) | 84 (21, 97) | 36 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.6, 1.5) |
| Perquimans County 6 | 114.0 (85.6, 150.1) | 85 (2, 100) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-5.1, 2.9) |
| Hoke County 6 | 113.2 (95.6, 133.0) | 86 (23, 99) | 31 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.9, 4.1) |
| Avery County 6 | 112.7 (86.0, 146.1) | 87 (3, 100) | 14 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.1, 6.1) |
| Montgomery County 6 | 110.0 (89.4, 134.2) | 88 (18, 99) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.2, 0.8) |
| Duplin County 6 | 105.4 (91.1, 121.4) | 89 (52, 98) | 44 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.4, 2.0) |
| Jackson County 6 | 103.0 (85.0, 123.7) | 90 (42, 100) | 28 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.0, 3.3) |
| Graham County 6 | 102.7 (68.8, 149.8) | 91 (2, 100) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.3 (-10.3, 1.5) |
| Yadkin County 6 | 102.2 (84.8, 122.5) | 92 (47, 100) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.9, 2.2) |
| Wilkes County 6 | 101.6 (89.1, 115.6) | 93 (66, 99) | 54 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.4, 1.6) |
| Swain County 6 | 98.6 (70.7, 134.2) | 94 (10, 100) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-5.4, 1.6) |
| Camden County 6 | 91.2 (61.6, 131.3) | 95 (6, 100) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-5.9, 4.8) |
| Hyde County 6 | 90.6 (49.7, 157.5) | 96 (1, 100) | 3 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-4.6, 4.2) |
| Alleghany County 6 | 90.3 (62.9, 127.9) | 97 (18, 100) | 9 |
stable
|
0.1 (-4.1, 5.0) |
| Ashe County 6 | 87.7 (69.2, 110.4) | 98 (68, 100) | 19 |
stable
|
0.1 (-4.0, 4.5) |
| Currituck County 6 | 80.0 (62.4, 101.4) | 99 (84, 100) | 15 |
falling 
|
-18.1 (-37.2, -1.5) |
| Gates County 6 | 74.9 (47.8, 112.7) | 100 (44, 100) | 6 |
stable
|
-3.2 (-7.1, 0.4) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 2:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 2:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.