Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Cervix (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 7.2?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 Yes 7.1 (6.8, 7.4) N/A 387 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 No 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) N/A 13,012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Mecklenburg County 6 Yes 6.9 (6.0, 8.0) 26 (17, 38) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.3)
Wake County 6 Yes 4.7 (4.0, 5.6) 42 (32, 42) 26 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.9)
Guilford County 6 Yes 6.3 (5.0, 7.8) 33 (18, 42) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Cumberland County 6 No 8.4 (6.5, 10.8) 22 (6, 36) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.0)
Forsyth County 6 Yes 5.8 (4.3, 7.5) 37 (19, 42) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.6)
Durham County 6 Yes 6.4 (4.7, 8.4) 32 (14, 42) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Gaston County 6 No 8.1 (5.9, 10.8) 23 (6, 40) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Davidson County 6 No 10.7 (7.6, 14.5) 10 (1, 34) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.0, 6.6)
Buncombe County 6 Yes 6.0 (4.2, 8.2) 36 (15, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.0)
Iredell County 6 No 8.6 (6.0, 11.9) 20 (4, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.6, 5.1)
Alamance County 6 No 8.9 (6.2, 12.3) 19 (3, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Robeson County 6 No 11.1 (7.8, 15.4) 7 (1, 33) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.8, 5.4)
Onslow County 6 No 10.4 (7.2, 14.3) 12 (1, 36) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.3, 7.6)
Cabarrus County 6 Yes 6.7 (4.6, 9.3) 30 (10, 42) 7
*
*
Union County 6 Yes 6.2 (4.3, 8.6) 34 (13, 42) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.2, 4.1)
New Hanover County 6 Yes 5.3 (3.6, 7.6) 41 (19, 42) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.2, 3.2)
Pitt County 6 Yes 6.5 (4.3, 9.4) 31 (10, 42) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.6, 1.1)
Wayne County 6 No 9.3 (6.1, 13.5) 15 (2, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.2, 7.5)
Johnston County 6 Yes 5.6 (3.7, 8.1) 39 (15, 42) 6 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.8, 1.0)
Rowan County 6 Yes 6.7 (4.4, 9.9) 29 (9, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.5, 5.8)
Moore County 6 No 11.0 (7.1, 16.3) 8 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.4)
Harnett County 6 No 7.9 (5.1, 11.6) 24 (4, 42) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.2, 1.1)
Craven County 6 No 9.3 (5.8, 14.0) 16 (2, 41) 5
*
*
Catawba County 6 Yes 5.7 (3.6, 8.6) 38 (13, 42) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-8.5, 3.8)
Halifax County 6 No 15.9 (9.8, 24.3) 1 (1, 28) 5
*
*
Brunswick County 6 Yes 6.9 (4.1, 10.9) 27 (6, 42) 5
*
*
Cleveland County 6 No 9.1 (5.6, 13.9) 17 (2, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.6)
Randolph County 6 Yes 6.0 (3.7, 9.2) 35 (11, 42) 5 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.5, -2.0)
Burke County 6 No 9.5 (5.8, 14.6) 14 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Orange County 6 Yes 5.3 (3.3, 8.3) 40 (15, 42) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.8, 6.2)
Caldwell County 6 No 9.0 (5.4, 14.1) 18 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Chatham County 6 No 12.0 (7.0, 19.0) 4 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Haywood County 6 No 12.0 (7.0, 19.2) 3 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.8, 6.8)
Sampson County 6 No 11.8 (7.0, 18.6) 6 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.2)
Nash County 6 Yes 6.8 (4.0, 11.0) 28 (5, 42) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.7)
Rockingham County 6 No 7.6 (4.4, 12.1) 25 (3, 42) 4 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.5)
Carteret County 6 No 8.5 (4.7, 14.2) 21 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Duplin County 6 No 10.6 (6.0, 17.4) 11 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.4, 5.6)
Lenoir County 6 No 12.0 (6.7, 19.5) 5 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.5, 6.3)
Stanly County 6 No 10.8 (6.0, 17.8) 9 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Granville County 6 No 10.3 (5.7, 17.1) 13 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend 27.9 (-8.0, 77.8)
McDowell County 6 No 15.1 (8.2, 25.1) 2 (1, 39) 3 stable stable trend -39.6 (-73.8, 39.5)
Alexander County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rutherford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2022 12:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Caswell, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Columbus, Currituck, Dare, Davie, Edgecombe, Franklin, Gates, Graham, Greene, Henderson, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Lee, Lincoln, Macon, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Person, Polk, Richmond, Rutherford, Scotland, Stokes, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Wilkes, Wilson, Yadkin, Yancey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top