Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 *** 10.1 (9.8, 10.5) N/A 639 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 10.7 (10.6, 10.8) N/A 21,113 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.5)
Henderson County 6 *** 16.4 (12.9, 20.9) 1 (1, 23) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.3)
Chatham County 6 *** 16.3 (11.3, 23.1) 2 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.4, 5.5)
Haywood County 6 *** 15.1 (9.9, 22.4) 3 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 15.1 (8.8, 24.4) 4 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Person County 6 *** 14.3 (8.3, 23.2) 5 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.2, 4.6)
Pender County 6 *** 13.7 (8.9, 20.4) 6 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-2.8, 10.3)
Beaufort County 6 *** 13.7 (8.5, 21.2) 7 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.2, 4.7)
Hoke County 6 *** 13.3 (7.5, 21.7) 8 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Caldwell County 6 *** 13.1 (9.0, 18.6) 9 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.1)
Alamance County 6 *** 13.1 (10.1, 16.6) 10 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.0)
Onslow County 6 *** 12.9 (9.5, 17.1) 11 (1, 48) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.7)
Macon County 6 *** 12.4 (6.7, 21.7) 12 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Craven County 6 *** 12.4 (8.7, 17.1) 13 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.9)
Wayne County 6 *** 12.3 (9.0, 16.6) 14 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.0)
Burke County 6 *** 12.3 (8.7, 17.2) 15 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend -5.7 (-11.6, 0.6)
Sampson County 6 *** 12.3 (7.8, 18.6) 16 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 6.6)
Cleveland County 6 *** 12.1 (8.4, 17.1) 17 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.8)
Buncombe County 6 *** 12.1 (9.8, 14.8) 18 (3, 44) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
New Hanover County 6 *** 11.8 (9.3, 14.7) 19 (3, 46) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.4)
Randolph County 6 *** 11.7 (8.6, 15.6) 20 (2, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.8)
Orange County 6 *** 11.6 (8.4, 15.7) 21 (2, 52) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.6)
Carteret County 6 *** 11.3 (7.3, 17.0) 22 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.7, 3.8)
Guilford County 6 *** 11.3 (9.6, 13.1) 23 (7, 43) 35 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Union County 6 *** 11.2 (8.6, 14.2) 24 (4, 50) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.6)
Richmond County 6 *** 11.0 (6.1, 18.4) 25 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Brunswick County 6 *** 10.9 (7.9, 14.8) 26 (3, 52) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.4)
Pitt County 6 *** 10.8 (8.0, 14.3) 27 (4, 52) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.2)
Davidson County 6 *** 10.8 (8.2, 14.1) 28 (4, 52) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.1)
McDowell County 6 *** 10.1 (5.6, 17.2) 29 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Wake County 6 *** 10.1 (8.9, 11.3) 30 (15, 46) 55 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Harnett County 6 *** 10.0 (6.9, 14.1) 31 (4, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.5)
Lenoir County 6 *** 10.0 (5.8, 16.2) 32 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.2, 1.9)
Durham County 6 *** 9.9 (7.9, 12.3) 33 (10, 52) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.1)
Rowan County 6 *** 9.8 (7.1, 13.2) 34 (6, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 3.8)
Forsyth County 6 *** 9.6 (7.8, 11.6) 35 (13, 52) 22 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.9)
Surry County 6 *** 9.5 (6.0, 14.5) 36 (3, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.3)
Cabarrus County 6 *** 9.4 (7.0, 12.3) 37 (8, 54) 11 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -0.8)
Catawba County 6 *** 9.4 (6.8, 12.6) 38 (8, 54) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.6)
Moore County 6 *** 9.1 (6.0, 13.3) 39 (6, 54) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.3)
Cumberland County 6 *** 9.1 (7.1, 11.4) 40 (14, 53) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.5)
Gaston County 6 *** 9.0 (6.9, 11.7) 41 (11, 54) 12 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.0, -2.2)
Rutherford County 6 *** 9.0 (5.5, 14.1) 42 (4, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.2, 3.3)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 9.0 (7.9, 10.2) 43 (24, 51) 50 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.5)
Rockingham County 6 *** 8.9 (5.9, 13.1) 44 (6, 54) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.7, 0.4)
Nash County 6 *** 8.9 (5.7, 13.3) 45 (6, 54) 5
*
*
Johnston County 6 *** 8.9 (6.5, 11.9) 46 (10, 54) 10 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.4, 0.0)
Granville County 6 *** 8.6 (4.8, 14.5) 47 (4, 54) 3 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.6, -2.5)
Columbus County 6 *** 8.3 (4.6, 14.2) 48 (4, 54) 3
*
*
Lee County 6 *** 8.3 (4.7, 13.7) 49 (5, 54) 3 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.6, 2.5)
Iredell County 6 *** 8.2 (5.9, 11.2) 50 (16, 54) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.8, -0.6)
Lincoln County 6 *** 7.6 (4.6, 12.1) 51 (9, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.5, 2.9)
Wilson County 6 *** 7.6 (4.8, 11.7) 52 (13, 54) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.2, 0.8)
Robeson County 6 *** 7.5 (4.9, 10.9) 53 (17, 54) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 4.2)
Wilkes County 6 *** 6.4 (3.6, 10.9) 54 (16, 54) 3
*
*
Alexander County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/26/2022 5:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top