Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban ascending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 9.3 (9.0, 9.7) N/A 600 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.9, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 10.1 (10.0, 10.1) N/A 20,027 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.1)
Alamance County 6 Urban 11.6 (8.8, 15.0) 10 (1, 43) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.4)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 11.1 (7.9, 15.3) 14 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.8)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 9.8 (7.8, 12.2) 24 (5, 45) 19 falling falling trend -22.3 (-33.9, -6.1)
Burke County 6 Urban 8.1 (5.1, 12.5) 43 (5, 49) 5 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.5, -2.7)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 8.0 (5.9, 10.6) 44 (10, 49) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.1)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 15.2 (10.7, 21.1) 1 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.0, 8.6)
Catawba County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.0, 14.2) 17 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.4)
Chatham County 6 Urban 14.4 (9.8, 20.6) 2 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.9, 5.7)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 9.6 (7.6, 12.0) 25 (5, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.0)
Davidson County 6 Urban 11.7 (8.9, 15.2) 7 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 1.9)
Durham County 6 Urban 8.9 (7.0, 11.2) 35 (9, 47) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.2)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.5, 11.1) 31 (9, 46) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.9)
Franklin County 6 Urban 8.8 (5.1, 14.3) 38 (1, 49) 4 falling falling trend -5.8 (-12.7, -0.1)
Gaston County 6 Urban 9.3 (7.2, 11.8) 30 (6, 47) 14 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.0, -0.9)
Guilford County 6 Urban 10.4 (8.8, 12.1) 19 (5, 40) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.9)
Henderson County 6 Urban 11.2 (8.3, 15.0) 13 (1, 45) 12 stable stable trend -27.1 (-49.1, 0.0)
Iredell County 6 Urban 7.4 (5.3, 10.2) 47 (13, 49) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.0, -1.0)
Johnston County 6 Urban 9.4 (7.0, 12.3) 27 (4, 48) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 9.5 (6.1, 14.3) 26 (2, 49) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.4, 3.6)
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 8.6 (7.5, 9.7) 39 (19, 45) 51 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Moore County 6 Urban 7.9 (4.9, 12.1) 45 (5, 49) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.0)
Nash County 6 Urban 6.5 (3.9, 10.3) 48 (12, 49) 4
*
*
New Hanover County 6 Urban 8.4 (6.4, 10.8) 40 (10, 48) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.1, 0.7)
Onslow County 6 Urban 11.8 (8.6, 15.8) 6 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.3, 4.6)
Orange County 6 Urban 11.0 (7.9, 14.9) 16 (1, 47) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.5)
Pender County 6 Urban 11.1 (6.9, 17.1) 15 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.7, 8.8)
Pitt County 6 Urban 7.4 (5.1, 10.5) 46 (11, 49) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.5)
Randolph County 6 Urban 8.3 (5.8, 11.5) 42 (6, 49) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.6)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 10.5 (7.2, 14.9) 18 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.6, 1.1)
Rowan County 6 Urban 9.0 (6.3, 12.4) 33 (4, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.6)
Union County 6 Urban 8.9 (6.8, 11.6) 34 (7, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.8)
Wake County 6 Urban 10.2 (9.0, 11.4) 21 (8, 37) 60 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.9)
Wayne County 6 Urban 11.4 (8.1, 15.5) 12 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Beaufort County 6 Rural 10.3 (5.6, 17.6) 20 (1, 49) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.6, 4.0)
Carteret County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.3, 14.3) 37 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.3)
Cleveland County 6 Rural 8.3 (5.2, 12.6) 41 (4, 49) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.3)
Craven County 6 Rural 9.3 (6.2, 13.6) 28 (2, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.3, 2.3)
Harnett County 6 Rural 10.0 (6.9, 13.9) 22 (2, 48) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.9)
Haywood County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.1, 18.3) 8 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.1, 21.0) 4 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.8, 19.3) 3 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.1, 2.6)
Macon County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.0, 18.9) 11 (1, 48) 4
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural 12.1 (7.1, 19.6) 5 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Robeson County 6 Rural 4.2 (2.4, 7.0) 49 (38, 49) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.2)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.4, 14.2) 36 (2, 49) 4 falling falling trend -10.5 (-38.6, -3.7)
Sampson County 6 Rural 9.9 (5.9, 15.8) 23 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.6, 7.3)
Surry County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.9, 16.9) 9 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.3, 1.1)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 9.3 (5.7, 14.7) 29 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Wilson County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.6, 14.0) 32 (2, 49) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.4)
Alexander County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lenoir County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 7:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top