Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 *** 117.4 (116.1, 118.7) N/A 6,808 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 5.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Tyrrell County 6 *** 169.9 (108.2, 257.5) 1 (1, 98) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.2, 9.0)
Jones County 6 *** 155.8 (116.9, 205.5) 2 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 2.0)
Halifax County 6 *** 145.9 (128.2, 165.6) 3 (1, 38) 51 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Pasquotank County 6 *** 143.4 (121.9, 167.7) 4 (1, 55) 33 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.6)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 141.3 (136.1, 146.6) 5 (1, 17) 628 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.5)
Anson County 6 *** 139.0 (113.9, 168.4) 6 (1, 75) 23 stable stable trend 13.0 (-6.3, 36.4)
Lee County 6 *** 136.2 (118.9, 155.4) 7 (1, 59) 47 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Caswell County 6 *** 136.1 (111.7, 165.0) 8 (1, 84) 23 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Bertie County 6 *** 135.2 (108.9, 166.8) 9 (1, 89) 19 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5)
Guilford County 6 *** 133.7 (127.6, 140.1) 10 (4, 29) 375 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.7)
Martin County 6 *** 132.4 (108.8, 160.6) 11 (1, 82) 23 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.6, 10.0)
Cumberland County 6 *** 131.4 (122.8, 140.5) 12 (3, 39) 185 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Union County 6 *** 131.3 (121.6, 141.6) 13 (3, 43) 148 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Craven County 6 *** 129.8 (117.5, 143.1) 14 (2, 54) 85 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.3)
Lenoir County 6 *** 128.8 (112.5, 146.9) 15 (2, 72) 48 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.4, -3.2)
Wayne County 6 *** 128.7 (116.6, 141.7) 16 (3, 54) 88 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Northampton County 6 *** 128.4 (104.7, 157.2) 17 (1, 89) 21 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.6, -2.8)
Wake County 6 *** 127.8 (123.0, 132.7) 18 (8, 36) 590 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.3, 8.8)
Washington County 6 *** 127.5 (97.2, 166.4) 19 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)
Hoke County 6 *** 126.7 (105.2, 151.3) 20 (1, 88) 28 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.5)
Hertford County 6 *** 125.3 (101.6, 153.5) 21 (1, 92) 20 falling falling trend -9.4 (-15.8, -2.4)
Pamlico County 6 *** 124.7 (97.4, 159.8) 22 (1, 96) 15 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.5)
Randolph County 6 *** 124.6 (114.2, 135.8) 23 (4, 59) 111 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Rockingham County 6 *** 124.3 (112.2, 137.5) 24 (4, 66) 81 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Cabarrus County 6 *** 124.1 (114.3, 134.5) 25 (5, 58) 126 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.8, 10.3)
Iredell County 6 *** 123.9 (114.2, 134.3) 26 (6, 59) 126 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.6, -2.4)
Moore County 6 *** 123.5 (112.2, 135.8) 27 (5, 66) 91 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.2)
Swain County 6 *** 122.4 (91.9, 160.6) 28 (1, 99) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.4, 5.4)
Robeson County 6 *** 121.8 (110.4, 134.0) 29 (5, 67) 91 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.7, -3.1)
Chowan County 6 *** 121.7 (93.5, 157.3) 30 (1, 98) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Columbus County 6 *** 121.4 (105.8, 138.8) 31 (3, 82) 47 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.1)
Forsyth County 6 *** 121.3 (114.5, 128.5) 32 (13, 55) 248 falling falling trend -6.5 (-9.0, -3.9)
Perquimans County 6 *** 121.3 (94.6, 155.3) 33 (1, 97) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.4)
Rowan County 6 *** 120.4 (110.1, 131.5) 34 (8, 68) 106 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.4, -1.4)
Wilson County 6 *** 120.0 (106.3, 135.0) 35 (6, 79) 60 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.1)
Camden County 6 *** 118.6 (83.7, 164.7) 36 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.7, 1.7)
Sampson County 6 *** 118.5 (103.3, 135.4) 37 (4, 85) 46 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Catawba County 6 *** 118.5 (108.9, 128.8) 38 (11, 68) 119 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Cleveland County 6 *** 117.1 (105.3, 130.1) 39 (9, 81) 75 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.7, -2.2)
Rutherford County 6 *** 115.2 (101.7, 130.2) 40 (8, 86) 56 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Scotland County 6 *** 114.9 (94.9, 138.0) 41 (3, 95) 25 falling falling trend -11.7 (-17.1, -5.9)
Johnston County 6 *** 114.6 (104.6, 125.4) 42 (14, 78) 109 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Warren County 6 *** 114.4 (92.3, 141.3) 43 (2, 97) 20 falling falling trend -9.6 (-12.8, -6.2)
Durham County 6 *** 114.2 (106.1, 122.9) 44 (18, 71) 158 stable stable trend 3.6 (-11.9, 21.8)
Edgecombe County 6 *** 114.2 (98.5, 131.9) 45 (6, 89) 41 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -2.8)
Harnett County 6 *** 113.4 (101.3, 126.5) 46 (11, 84) 69 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.7)
Montgomery County 6 *** 112.8 (91.9, 137.6) 47 (3, 98) 22 falling falling trend -20.2 (-36.0, -0.5)
Onslow County 6 *** 112.6 (100.9, 125.1) 48 (12, 85) 72 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Alamance County 6 *** 112.0 (102.4, 122.3) 49 (19, 82) 104 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.5)
Pender County 6 *** 111.3 (96.5, 127.9) 50 (10, 92) 44 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Franklin County 6 *** 109.9 (95.2, 126.4) 51 (8, 93) 44 stable stable trend 13.4 (-5.8, 36.4)
Lincoln County 6 *** 109.5 (97.2, 123.2) 52 (13, 91) 61 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.4)
Haywood County 6 *** 108.2 (95.4, 122.7) 53 (17, 92) 53 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.2)
Dare County 6 *** 108.0 (90.8, 128.0) 54 (7, 97) 31 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Macon County 6 *** 107.8 (91.6, 126.7) 55 (9, 97) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Surry County 6 *** 107.4 (94.8, 121.4) 56 (20, 92) 54 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.8)
Stokes County 6 *** 107.3 (92.2, 124.6) 57 (13, 96) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Avery County 6 *** 107.2 (83.4, 136.7) 58 (3, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.6)
Chatham County 6 *** 106.8 (94.5, 120.5) 59 (16, 93) 57 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -2.3)
Stanly County 6 *** 105.8 (91.8, 121.6) 60 (15, 95) 43 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Currituck County 6 *** 105.4 (84.4, 130.8) 61 (6, 99) 19 stable stable trend -3.4 (-6.9, 0.1)
Greene County 6 *** 105.0 (80.8, 134.6) 62 (3, 99) 14 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.0, -2.0)
Alexander County 6 *** 104.9 (87.6, 125.0) 63 (9, 98) 28 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7)
Alleghany County 6 *** 104.9 (77.9, 141.0) 64 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend 14.3 (-10.7, 46.4)
Duplin County 6 *** 104.8 (90.1, 121.4) 65 (14, 96) 38 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Nash County 6 *** 104.6 (93.2, 117.3) 66 (23, 94) 64 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.1)
Granville County 6 *** 104.6 (89.9, 121.2) 67 (13, 97) 39 falling falling trend -7.3 (-9.8, -4.7)
Pitt County 6 *** 104.6 (94.3, 115.6) 68 (28, 92) 83 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.3, -3.2)
Gaston County 6 *** 104.3 (96.2, 112.9) 69 (37, 88) 132 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.6, -3.3)
Buncombe County 6 *** 103.8 (96.9, 111.2) 70 (38, 87) 172 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.1, -3.7)
Henderson County 6 *** 102.4 (93.2, 112.4) 71 (35, 92) 95 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.2)
Clay County 6 *** 102.3 (75.1, 139.4) 72 (2, 100) 10 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.0, 1.1)
Richmond County 6 *** 101.9 (85.3, 121.1) 73 (14, 98) 28 stable stable trend 10.0 (-11.1, 36.0)
Beaufort County 6 *** 101.3 (86.6, 118.2) 74 (19, 98) 37 falling falling trend -10.8 (-16.4, -4.7)
Brunswick County 6 *** 100.4 (92.1, 109.5) 75 (41, 93) 126 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Davidson County 6 *** 99.3 (90.9, 108.4) 76 (43, 94) 107 stable stable trend 0.2 (-10.0, 11.6)
Hyde County 6 *** 98.6 (56.7, 161.7) 77 (1, 100) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.4, 2.0)
Wilkes County 6 *** 98.4 (86.3, 111.9) 78 (35, 97) 50 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -1.7)
Burke County 6 *** 97.6 (86.8, 109.6) 79 (38, 97) 61 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -2.8)
Caldwell County 6 *** 97.4 (86.1, 110.0) 80 (36, 98) 56 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Cherokee County 6 *** 97.3 (80.6, 117.6) 81 (19, 99) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.0)
Gates County 6 *** 97.0 (69.8, 133.5) 82 (4, 100) 9 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.7, -0.8)
Transylvania County 6 *** 96.9 (82.0, 114.6) 83 (28, 99) 31 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.3, -1.8)
Person County 6 *** 96.6 (80.5, 115.5) 84 (23, 99) 27 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.5, -2.7)
Polk County 6 *** 96.0 (77.2, 119.8) 85 (17, 99) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.2)
New Hanover County 6 *** 95.1 (87.6, 103.1) 86 (55, 96) 125 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Orange County 6 *** 93.0 (82.8, 104.1) 87 (52, 98) 67 stable stable trend 4.9 (-14.4, 28.5)
Mitchell County 6 *** 92.1 (70.1, 120.6) 88 (12, 100) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.6)
Watauga County 6 *** 91.5 (76.7, 108.7) 89 (35, 99) 29 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -0.6)
Carteret County 6 *** 91.4 (80.3, 103.9) 90 (49, 99) 52 falling falling trend -5.6 (-6.8, -4.3)
Yadkin County 6 *** 91.4 (75.3, 110.2) 91 (32, 99) 24 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.6)
Bladen County 6 *** 90.3 (73.9, 109.8) 92 (33, 100) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Ashe County 6 *** 89.9 (72.8, 110.8) 93 (33, 100) 20 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.3, -1.7)
Vance County 6 *** 89.2 (73.5, 107.4) 94 (38, 100) 25 falling falling trend -10.8 (-14.5, -7.0)
Madison County 6 *** 87.2 (68.3, 110.9) 95 (28, 100) 15 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.2, -2.6)
McDowell County 6 *** 84.4 (70.4, 100.8) 96 (54, 100) 27 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -2.8)
Davie County 6 *** 84.2 (70.1, 100.7) 97 (54, 100) 26 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.3)
Jackson County 6 *** 81.0 (66.3, 98.3) 98 (54, 100) 23 falling falling trend -8.7 (-12.7, -4.4)
Yancey County 6 *** 76.0 (57.2, 100.4) 99 (48, 100) 11 falling falling trend -9.4 (-14.0, -4.7)
Graham County 6 *** 49.0 (28.1, 82.4) 100 (81, 100) 3 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.2, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/14/2021 1:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top