Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 123.9 (122.6, 125.2) N/A 7,846 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 5.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Scotland County 6 87.2 (70.6, 106.9) 94 (44, 100) 20 falling falling trend -10.7 (-16.8, -7.9)
Hertford County 6 112.6 (90.5, 139.3) 58 (4, 98) 19 falling falling trend -8.3 (-19.1, -4.8)
Montgomery County 6 86.9 (69.6, 108.0) 95 (43, 100) 18 falling falling trend -7.8 (-24.1, -3.5)
Stokes County 6 93.5 (79.5, 109.7) 89 (45, 99) 33 stable stable trend -6.3 (-22.1, 0.6)
Yadkin County 6 86.2 (71.4, 103.7) 96 (59, 100) 24 falling falling trend -6.1 (-23.0, -2.0)
Gates County 6 74.8 (51.6, 107.3) 99 (42, 100) 7 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -1.0)
Wilkes County 6 78.3 (67.9, 90.2) 98 (83, 100) 42 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -1.9)
Bertie County 6 119.9 (95.3, 149.9) 41 (2, 96) 18 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.2, -1.4)
Person County 6 104.7 (88.4, 123.6) 76 (20, 98) 31 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -1.9)
Robeson County 6 123.2 (112.0, 135.3) 36 (8, 73) 95 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.2, -2.5)
Northampton County 6 134.5 (110.3, 163.6) 15 (1, 85) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.7)
Madison County 6 100.8 (79.9, 126.4) 83 (13, 100) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.6, -1.4)
Pitt County 6 115.9 (105.6, 126.8) 56 (20, 82) 101 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3)
Graham County 6 56.3 (34.4, 90.3) 100 (75, 100) 4 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.3, 0.8)
Lenoir County 6 140.9 (124.3, 159.3) 9 (1, 54) 55 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -1.5)
Pamlico County 6 116.0 (90.7, 149.0) 53 (2, 98) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5)
Camden County 6 89.4 (60.2, 129.3) 92 (5, 100) 6 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.1, 2.7)
Davie County 6 91.2 (77.1, 107.6) 91 (52, 100) 30 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.5)
Greene County 6 110.9 (86.3, 140.8) 61 (3, 99) 15 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.7, -0.1)
Clay County 6 95.0 (70.5, 128.7) 87 (12, 100) 11 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.0, 0.5)
Currituck County 6 93.9 (75.0, 116.6) 88 (26, 100) 18 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.6, 0.3)
Rowan County 6 117.0 (107.1, 127.7) 46 (19, 80) 108 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.4, -1.2)
McDowell County 6 98.4 (83.7, 115.2) 85 (35, 98) 34 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Nash County 6 109.2 (97.7, 121.7) 68 (28, 90) 70 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7)
Randolph County 6 110.4 (101.2, 120.4) 63 (31, 87) 108 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.3, -2.0)
Alamance County 6 115.9 (106.5, 125.9) 55 (21, 80) 117 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.8)
Craven County 6 142.2 (129.6, 155.8) 8 (1, 40) 98 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.8)
Lincoln County 6 123.3 (110.8, 137.0) 34 (7, 77) 75 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -0.8)
Washington County 6 119.2 (90.9, 156.2) 42 (1, 99) 13 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.8)
Macon County 6 103.3 (88.0, 121.3) 79 (24, 97) 35 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Wilson County 6 120.0 (106.6, 134.7) 40 (8, 85) 62 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.3)
Columbus County 6 125.3 (109.7, 142.7) 32 (3, 80) 49 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Harnett County 6 123.2 (111.3, 136.0) 35 (7, 74) 84 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.4)
Hyde County 6 132.1 (85.6, 199.4) 22 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.8, 2.9)
Mitchell County 6 102.9 (79.9, 132.4) 81 (7, 99) 14 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.9, 0.0)
Alleghany County 6 103.6 (77.3, 139.0) 78 (4, 100) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8)
Dare County 6 105.5 (89.5, 124.3) 73 (20, 96) 33 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 0.0)
Hoke County 6 132.5 (111.2, 156.6) 20 (1, 84) 31 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.3)
Watauga County 6 105.0 (89.8, 122.3) 74 (21, 96) 36 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 0.1)
Bladen County 6 104.3 (86.9, 124.7) 77 (17, 98) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.2)
Caswell County 6 136.8 (113.2, 164.9) 13 (1, 83) 25 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.1)
Avery County 6 106.6 (83.5, 135.2) 71 (6, 99) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Chowan County 6 109.9 (82.6, 144.8) 65 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 0.9)
Pasquotank County 6 134.0 (114.0, 156.7) 17 (1, 79) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Surry County 6 103.2 (91.0, 116.9) 80 (33, 95) 53 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Alexander County 6 111.8 (94.6, 131.6) 59 (11, 95) 31 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.4)
Halifax County 6 151.5 (133.7, 171.2) 3 (1, 38) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Haywood County 6 115.5 (102.7, 129.8) 57 (14, 88) 62 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Jones County 6 148.5 (111.9, 195.9) 6 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 1.8)
Wayne County 6 130.3 (118.7, 142.9) 24 (5, 62) 97 stable stable trend -1.5 (-11.5, 0.1)
Catawba County 6 128.9 (119.2, 139.3) 25 (7, 60) 137 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.2)
Cumberland County 6 134.4 (126.1, 143.1) 16 (4, 42) 206 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Duplin County 6 117.1 (102.3, 133.8) 45 (8, 88) 47 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7)
Moore County 6 143.3 (131.5, 156.1) 7 (1, 35) 112 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Lee County 6 136.9 (120.4, 155.2) 12 (1, 61) 52 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.6)
Rockingham County 6 116.0 (104.5, 128.6) 54 (16, 83) 78 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Rutherford County 6 116.7 (103.4, 131.4) 50 (12, 86) 59 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Union County 6 133.4 (124.3, 143.1) 18 (5, 46) 170 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.8)
Pender County 6 125.8 (110.6, 142.7) 31 (3, 80) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.7)
Warren County 6 116.2 (94.4, 143.0) 52 (3, 97) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 5.8)
Brunswick County 6 106.4 (98.7, 114.8) 72 (40, 88) 165 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.1)
Stanly County 6 117.6 (103.3, 133.6) 43 (9, 87) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1)
Perquimans County 6 117.2 (91.1, 150.9) 44 (1, 99) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.5)
Carteret County 6 84.7 (74.7, 96.0) 97 (76, 100) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.5, 7.7)
Cherokee County 6 92.5 (77.0, 111.4) 90 (42, 100) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.6)
Caldwell County 6 101.9 (90.7, 114.4) 82 (35, 96) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-8.4, 9.9)
Davidson County 6 99.6 (91.4, 108.4) 84 (56, 95) 114 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.4, 8.1)
Polk County 6 110.4 (90.5, 135.2) 64 (6, 98) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.9)
Swain County 6 122.0 (92.4, 159.1) 37 (1, 98) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 5.5)
Anson County 6 170.8 (142.9, 203.1) 1 (1, 32) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.2)
Forsyth County 6 116.9 (110.5, 123.6) 47 (28, 72) 260 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.6, 4.8)
Sampson County 6 127.4 (112.1, 144.3) 29 (3, 77) 53 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 12.3)
Guilford County 6 136.6 (130.7, 142.8) 14 (5, 32) 411 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.7, 9.9)
Tyrrell County 6 150.1 (91.8, 234.8) 5 (1, 100) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 8.7)
Mecklenburg County 6 151.4 (146.4, 156.5) 4 (1, 12) 757 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 6.7)
Buncombe County 6 111.1 (104.2, 118.5) 60 (33, 83) 200 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.8, 10.2)
Gaston County 6 116.7 (108.5, 125.4) 49 (23, 77) 159 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 9.6)
Chatham County 6 116.8 (104.7, 130.2) 48 (14, 84) 70 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 10.7)
Martin County 6 132.4 (108.9, 160.4) 21 (1, 86) 24 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.2, 14.4)
Wake County 6 139.0 (134.3, 143.8) 11 (5, 25) 731 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.4, 7.0)
Henderson County 6 110.6 (101.4, 120.7) 62 (29, 86) 110 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.6, 12.8)
Johnston County 6 124.4 (114.9, 134.5) 33 (11, 66) 139 stable stable trend 4.6 (-1.5, 9.3)
Transylvania County 6 104.7 (89.4, 122.8) 75 (21, 97) 36 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.4, 11.8)
Onslow County 6 127.8 (116.0, 140.4) 28 (6, 67) 91 stable stable trend 4.8 (-4.6, 14.1)
Ashe County 6 109.6 (91.3, 131.5) 66 (9, 97) 27 stable stable trend 5.2 (-4.5, 22.3)
Cabarrus County 6 132.7 (123.2, 142.8) 19 (5, 51) 152 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.0, 10.3)
Durham County 6 131.0 (122.9, 139.4) 23 (7, 50) 209 rising rising trend 6.3 (0.1, 13.7)
Vance County 6 109.6 (92.3, 129.4) 67 (12, 96) 31 stable stable trend 7.2 (-3.4, 17.8)
Cleveland County 6 121.2 (109.4, 134.2) 38 (8, 80) 81 stable stable trend 7.3 (-1.0, 14.1)
Iredell County 6 140.7 (130.7, 151.2) 10 (2, 33) 157 rising rising trend 8.0 (2.5, 13.3)
Granville County 6 126.3 (111.2, 143.2) 30 (3, 79) 53 stable stable trend 8.6 (-4.2, 23.5)
Franklin County 6 128.4 (113.5, 144.8) 27 (4, 76) 58 rising rising trend 9.1 (1.9, 23.1)
Beaufort County 6 108.0 (93.5, 124.6) 69 (19, 95) 42 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.6, 19.0)
Orange County 6 116.6 (105.8, 128.3) 51 (17, 82) 92 stable stable trend 10.3 (-2.7, 19.6)
Yancey County 6 88.6 (68.5, 114.2) 93 (31, 100) 14 stable stable trend 11.4 (-2.4, 22.6)
New Hanover County 6 120.6 (112.6, 129.0) 39 (17, 70) 177 rising rising trend 11.6 (4.2, 21.9)
Richmond County 6 128.6 (110.3, 149.2) 26 (2, 85) 37 rising rising trend 11.9 (3.3, 25.2)
Burke County 6 108.0 (97.1, 120.0) 70 (30, 91) 73 rising rising trend 12.0 (4.0, 19.6)
Jackson County 6 98.3 (82.6, 116.4) 86 (28, 99) 29 rising rising trend 13.3 (0.2, 27.2)
Edgecombe County 6 151.7 (133.5, 172.0) 2 (1, 39) 54 rising rising trend 14.6 (6.0, 23.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 6:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top