Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 123.9 (122.6, 125.2) | N/A | 7,846 | rising | 3.0 (0.9, 5.6) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) | N/A | 212,734 | rising | 2.5 (1.0, 4.1) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 151.7 (133.5, 172.0) | 2 (1, 39) | 54 | rising | 14.6 (6.0, 23.1) |
Jackson County 6 | 98.3 (82.6, 116.4) | 86 (28, 99) | 29 | rising | 13.3 (0.2, 27.2) |
Burke County 6 | 108.0 (97.1, 120.0) | 70 (30, 91) | 73 | rising | 12.0 (4.0, 19.6) |
Richmond County 6 | 128.6 (110.3, 149.2) | 26 (2, 85) | 37 | rising | 11.9 (3.3, 25.2) |
New Hanover County 6 | 120.6 (112.6, 129.0) | 39 (17, 70) | 177 | rising | 11.6 (4.2, 21.9) |
Yancey County 6 | 88.6 (68.5, 114.2) | 93 (31, 100) | 14 | stable | 11.4 (-2.4, 22.6) |
Orange County 6 | 116.6 (105.8, 128.3) | 51 (17, 82) | 92 | stable | 10.3 (-2.7, 19.6) |
Beaufort County 6 | 108.0 (93.5, 124.6) | 69 (19, 95) | 42 | rising | 9.4 (1.6, 19.0) |
Franklin County 6 | 128.4 (113.5, 144.8) | 27 (4, 76) | 58 | rising | 9.1 (1.9, 23.1) |
Granville County 6 | 126.3 (111.2, 143.2) | 30 (3, 79) | 53 | stable | 8.6 (-4.2, 23.5) |
Iredell County 6 | 140.7 (130.7, 151.2) | 10 (2, 33) | 157 | rising | 8.0 (2.5, 13.3) |
Cleveland County 6 | 121.2 (109.4, 134.2) | 38 (8, 80) | 81 | stable | 7.3 (-1.0, 14.1) |
Vance County 6 | 109.6 (92.3, 129.4) | 67 (12, 96) | 31 | stable | 7.2 (-3.4, 17.8) |
Durham County 6 | 131.0 (122.9, 139.4) | 23 (7, 50) | 209 | rising | 6.3 (0.1, 13.7) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 132.7 (123.2, 142.8) | 19 (5, 51) | 152 | rising | 5.3 (1.0, 10.3) |
Ashe County 6 | 109.6 (91.3, 131.5) | 66 (9, 97) | 27 | stable | 5.2 (-4.5, 22.3) |
Onslow County 6 | 127.8 (116.0, 140.4) | 28 (6, 67) | 91 | stable | 4.8 (-4.6, 14.1) |
Johnston County 6 | 124.4 (114.9, 134.5) | 33 (11, 66) | 139 | stable | 4.6 (-1.5, 9.3) |
Transylvania County 6 | 104.7 (89.4, 122.8) | 75 (21, 97) | 36 | rising | 4.6 (0.4, 11.8) |
Henderson County 6 | 110.6 (101.4, 120.7) | 62 (29, 86) | 110 | stable | 4.2 (-0.6, 12.8) |
Wake County 6 | 139.0 (134.3, 143.8) | 11 (5, 25) | 731 | rising | 3.8 (1.4, 7.0) |
Martin County 6 | 132.4 (108.9, 160.4) | 21 (1, 86) | 24 | stable | 3.0 (-1.2, 14.4) |
Chatham County 6 | 116.8 (104.7, 130.2) | 48 (14, 84) | 70 | stable | 2.9 (-1.9, 10.7) |
Gaston County 6 | 116.7 (108.5, 125.4) | 49 (23, 77) | 159 | stable | 2.8 (-0.3, 9.6) |
Buncombe County 6 | 111.1 (104.2, 118.5) | 60 (33, 83) | 200 | stable | 2.7 (-3.8, 10.2) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 151.4 (146.4, 156.5) | 4 (1, 12) | 757 | rising | 2.5 (0.5, 6.7) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 150.1 (91.8, 234.8) | 5 (1, 100) | 4 | stable | 2.4 (-2.4, 8.7) |
Guilford County 6 | 136.6 (130.7, 142.8) | 14 (5, 32) | 411 | stable | 2.2 (-2.7, 9.9) |
Sampson County 6 | 127.4 (112.1, 144.3) | 29 (3, 77) | 53 | stable | 2.1 (-0.8, 12.3) |
Forsyth County 6 | 116.9 (110.5, 123.6) | 47 (28, 72) | 260 | stable | 0.9 (-3.6, 4.8) |
Anson County 6 | 170.8 (142.9, 203.1) | 1 (1, 32) | 28 | stable | 0.8 (-2.3, 4.2) |
Polk County 6 | 110.4 (90.5, 135.2) | 64 (6, 98) | 23 | stable | 0.4 (-1.8, 2.9) |
Swain County 6 | 122.0 (92.4, 159.1) | 37 (1, 98) | 12 | stable | 0.4 (-3.8, 5.5) |
Caldwell County 6 | 101.9 (90.7, 114.4) | 82 (35, 96) | 63 | stable | 0.3 (-8.4, 9.9) |
Davidson County 6 | 99.6 (91.4, 108.4) | 84 (56, 95) | 114 | stable | 0.3 (-5.4, 8.1) |
Cherokee County 6 | 92.5 (77.0, 111.4) | 90 (42, 100) | 27 | stable | 0.2 (-3.6, 4.6) |
Carteret County 6 | 84.7 (74.7, 96.0) | 97 (76, 100) | 55 | stable | 0.1 (-7.5, 7.7) |
Perquimans County 6 | 117.2 (91.1, 150.9) | 44 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | -0.4 (-3.0, 2.5) |
Stanly County 6 | 117.6 (103.3, 133.6) | 43 (9, 87) | 51 | stable | -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1) |
Brunswick County 6 | 106.4 (98.7, 114.8) | 72 (40, 88) | 165 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 1.1) |
Pender County 6 | 125.8 (110.6, 142.7) | 31 (3, 80) | 53 | stable | -0.8 (-2.9, 1.7) |
Warren County 6 | 116.2 (94.4, 143.0) | 52 (3, 97) | 21 | stable | -0.8 (-3.6, 5.8) |
Rutherford County 6 | 116.7 (103.4, 131.4) | 50 (12, 86) | 59 | stable | -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3) |
Union County 6 | 133.4 (124.3, 143.1) | 18 (5, 46) | 170 | stable | -1.0 (-2.4, 0.8) |
Rockingham County 6 | 116.0 (104.5, 128.6) | 54 (16, 83) | 78 | stable | -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0) |
Lee County 6 | 136.9 (120.4, 155.2) | 12 (1, 61) | 52 | stable | -1.3 (-4.0, 1.6) |
Catawba County 6 | 128.9 (119.2, 139.3) | 25 (7, 60) | 137 | stable | -1.4 (-2.7, 0.2) |
Cumberland County 6 | 134.4 (126.1, 143.1) | 16 (4, 42) | 206 | falling | -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3) |
Duplin County 6 | 117.1 (102.3, 133.8) | 45 (8, 88) | 47 | stable | -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7) |
Moore County 6 | 143.3 (131.5, 156.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 112 | stable | -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3) |
Wayne County 6 | 130.3 (118.7, 142.9) | 24 (5, 62) | 97 | stable | -1.5 (-11.5, 0.1) |
Jones County 6 | 148.5 (111.9, 195.9) | 6 (1, 90) | 12 | stable | -1.7 (-5.0, 1.8) |
Alexander County 6 | 111.8 (94.6, 131.6) | 59 (11, 95) | 31 | stable | -1.8 (-3.8, 0.4) |
Halifax County 6 | 151.5 (133.7, 171.2) | 3 (1, 38) | 55 | falling | -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3) |
Haywood County 6 | 115.5 (102.7, 129.8) | 57 (14, 88) | 62 | stable | -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 134.0 (114.0, 156.7) | 17 (1, 79) | 33 | falling | -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3) |
Surry County 6 | 103.2 (91.0, 116.9) | 80 (33, 95) | 53 | stable | -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4) |
Avery County 6 | 106.6 (83.5, 135.2) | 71 (6, 99) | 15 | falling | -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1) |
Chowan County 6 | 109.9 (82.6, 144.8) | 65 (2, 99) | 12 | stable | -2.0 (-4.9, 0.9) |
Bladen County 6 | 104.3 (86.9, 124.7) | 77 (17, 98) | 27 | falling | -2.1 (-3.8, -0.2) |
Caswell County 6 | 136.8 (113.2, 164.9) | 13 (1, 83) | 25 | stable | -2.1 (-4.1, 0.1) |
Alleghany County 6 | 103.6 (77.3, 139.0) | 78 (4, 100) | 11 | stable | -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8) |
Dare County 6 | 105.5 (89.5, 124.3) | 73 (20, 96) | 33 | stable | -2.3 (-4.4, 0.0) |
Hoke County 6 | 132.5 (111.2, 156.6) | 20 (1, 84) | 31 | stable | -2.3 (-4.5, 0.3) |
Watauga County 6 | 105.0 (89.8, 122.3) | 74 (21, 96) | 36 | stable | -2.3 (-4.4, 0.1) |
Columbus County 6 | 125.3 (109.7, 142.7) | 32 (3, 80) | 49 | falling | -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4) |
Harnett County 6 | 123.2 (111.3, 136.0) | 35 (7, 74) | 84 | falling | -2.5 (-4.4, -0.4) |
Hyde County 6 | 132.1 (85.6, 199.4) | 22 (1, 100) | 5 | stable | -2.5 (-7.8, 2.9) |
Mitchell County 6 | 102.9 (79.9, 132.4) | 81 (7, 99) | 14 | stable | -2.5 (-4.9, 0.0) |
Macon County 6 | 103.3 (88.0, 121.3) | 79 (24, 97) | 35 | falling | -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0) |
Wilson County 6 | 120.0 (106.6, 134.7) | 40 (8, 85) | 62 | falling | -2.6 (-4.7, -0.3) |
Alamance County 6 | 115.9 (106.5, 125.9) | 55 (21, 80) | 117 | falling | -2.9 (-5.0, -0.8) |
Craven County 6 | 142.2 (129.6, 155.8) | 8 (1, 40) | 98 | falling | -2.9 (-4.9, -0.8) |
Lincoln County 6 | 123.3 (110.8, 137.0) | 34 (7, 77) | 75 | falling | -2.9 (-4.7, -0.8) |
Washington County 6 | 119.2 (90.9, 156.2) | 42 (1, 99) | 13 | stable | -2.9 (-6.5, 0.8) |
Nash County 6 | 109.2 (97.7, 121.7) | 68 (28, 90) | 70 | falling | -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7) |
Randolph County 6 | 110.4 (101.2, 120.4) | 63 (31, 87) | 108 | falling | -3.0 (-6.3, -2.0) |
McDowell County 6 | 98.4 (83.7, 115.2) | 85 (35, 98) | 34 | falling | -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0) |
Rowan County 6 | 117.0 (107.1, 127.7) | 46 (19, 80) | 108 | falling | -3.2 (-6.4, -1.2) |
Clay County 6 | 95.0 (70.5, 128.7) | 87 (12, 100) | 11 | stable | -3.3 (-7.0, 0.5) |
Currituck County 6 | 93.9 (75.0, 116.6) | 88 (26, 100) | 18 | stable | -3.3 (-6.6, 0.3) |
Davie County 6 | 91.2 (77.1, 107.6) | 91 (52, 100) | 30 | falling | -3.4 (-6.2, -0.5) |
Greene County 6 | 110.9 (86.3, 140.8) | 61 (3, 99) | 15 | falling | -3.4 (-6.7, -0.1) |
Camden County 6 | 89.4 (60.2, 129.3) | 92 (5, 100) | 6 | stable | -3.5 (-9.1, 2.7) |
Graham County 6 | 56.3 (34.4, 90.3) | 100 (75, 100) | 4 | stable | -3.7 (-8.3, 0.8) |
Lenoir County 6 | 140.9 (124.3, 159.3) | 9 (1, 54) | 55 | falling | -3.7 (-6.0, -1.5) |
Pamlico County 6 | 116.0 (90.7, 149.0) | 53 (2, 98) | 15 | falling | -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5) |
Pitt County 6 | 115.9 (105.6, 126.8) | 56 (20, 82) | 101 | falling | -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3) |
Madison County 6 | 100.8 (79.9, 126.4) | 83 (13, 100) | 17 | falling | -4.0 (-6.6, -1.4) |
Northampton County 6 | 134.5 (110.3, 163.6) | 15 (1, 85) | 23 | falling | -4.1 (-6.7, -1.7) |
Bertie County 6 | 119.9 (95.3, 149.9) | 41 (2, 96) | 18 | falling | -4.3 (-7.2, -1.4) |
Person County 6 | 104.7 (88.4, 123.6) | 76 (20, 98) | 31 | falling | -4.3 (-6.6, -1.9) |
Robeson County 6 | 123.2 (112.0, 135.3) | 36 (8, 73) | 95 | falling | -4.3 (-6.2, -2.5) |
Wilkes County 6 | 78.3 (67.9, 90.2) | 98 (83, 100) | 42 | falling | -4.7 (-7.7, -1.9) |
Gates County 6 | 74.8 (51.6, 107.3) | 99 (42, 100) | 7 | falling | -5.3 (-9.7, -1.0) |
Yadkin County 6 | 86.2 (71.4, 103.7) | 96 (59, 100) | 24 | falling | -6.1 (-23.0, -2.0) |
Stokes County 6 | 93.5 (79.5, 109.7) | 89 (45, 99) | 33 | stable | -6.3 (-22.1, 0.6) |
Montgomery County 6 | 86.9 (69.6, 108.0) | 95 (43, 100) | 18 | falling | -7.8 (-24.1, -3.5) |
Hertford County 6 | 112.6 (90.5, 139.3) | 58 (4, 98) | 19 | falling | -8.3 (-19.1, -4.8) |
Scotland County 6 | 87.2 (70.6, 106.9) | 94 (44, 100) | 20 | falling | -10.7 (-16.8, -7.9) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 8:40 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 8:40 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.