Incidence Rates Table
County![]() |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 123.9 (122.6, 125.2) | N/A | 7,846 |
rising ![]() |
3.0 (0.9, 5.6) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) | N/A | 212,734 |
rising ![]() |
2.5 (1.0, 4.1) |
Anson County 6 | 170.8 (142.9, 203.1) | 1 (1, 32) | 28 |
stable ![]() |
0.8 (-2.3, 4.2) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 151.7 (133.5, 172.0) | 2 (1, 39) | 54 |
rising ![]() |
14.6 (6.0, 23.1) |
Halifax County 6 | 151.5 (133.7, 171.2) | 3 (1, 38) | 55 |
falling ![]() |
-1.8 (-3.3, -0.3) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 151.4 (146.4, 156.5) | 4 (1, 12) | 757 |
rising ![]() |
2.5 (0.5, 6.7) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 150.1 (91.8, 234.8) | 5 (1, 100) | 4 |
stable ![]() |
2.4 (-2.4, 8.7) |
Jones County 6 | 148.5 (111.9, 195.9) | 6 (1, 90) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
-1.7 (-5.0, 1.8) |
Moore County 6 | 143.3 (131.5, 156.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 112 |
stable ![]() |
-1.4 (-3.0, 0.3) |
Craven County 6 | 142.2 (129.6, 155.8) | 8 (1, 40) | 98 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.9, -0.8) |
Lenoir County 6 | 140.9 (124.3, 159.3) | 9 (1, 54) | 55 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-6.0, -1.5) |
Iredell County 6 | 140.7 (130.7, 151.2) | 10 (2, 33) | 157 |
rising ![]() |
8.0 (2.5, 13.3) |
Wake County 6 | 139.0 (134.3, 143.8) | 11 (5, 25) | 731 |
rising ![]() |
3.8 (1.4, 7.0) |
Lee County 6 | 136.9 (120.4, 155.2) | 12 (1, 61) | 52 |
stable ![]() |
-1.3 (-4.0, 1.6) |
Caswell County 6 | 136.8 (113.2, 164.9) | 13 (1, 83) | 25 |
stable ![]() |
-2.1 (-4.1, 0.1) |
Guilford County 6 | 136.6 (130.7, 142.8) | 14 (5, 32) | 411 |
stable ![]() |
2.2 (-2.7, 9.9) |
Northampton County 6 | 134.5 (110.3, 163.6) | 15 (1, 85) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-6.7, -1.7) |
Cumberland County 6 | 134.4 (126.1, 143.1) | 16 (4, 42) | 206 |
falling ![]() |
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.3) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 134.0 (114.0, 156.7) | 17 (1, 79) | 33 |
falling ![]() |
-1.9 (-3.4, -0.3) |
Union County 6 | 133.4 (124.3, 143.1) | 18 (5, 46) | 170 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-2.4, 0.8) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 132.7 (123.2, 142.8) | 19 (5, 51) | 152 |
rising ![]() |
5.3 (1.0, 10.3) |
Hoke County 6 | 132.5 (111.2, 156.6) | 20 (1, 84) | 31 |
stable ![]() |
-2.3 (-4.5, 0.3) |
Martin County 6 | 132.4 (108.9, 160.4) | 21 (1, 86) | 24 |
stable ![]() |
3.0 (-1.2, 14.4) |
Hyde County 6 | 132.1 (85.6, 199.4) | 22 (1, 100) | 5 |
stable ![]() |
-2.5 (-7.8, 2.9) |
Durham County 6 | 131.0 (122.9, 139.4) | 23 (7, 50) | 209 |
rising ![]() |
6.3 (0.1, 13.7) |
Wayne County 6 | 130.3 (118.7, 142.9) | 24 (5, 62) | 97 |
stable ![]() |
-1.5 (-11.5, 0.1) |
Catawba County 6 | 128.9 (119.2, 139.3) | 25 (7, 60) | 137 |
stable ![]() |
-1.4 (-2.7, 0.2) |
Richmond County 6 | 128.6 (110.3, 149.2) | 26 (2, 85) | 37 |
rising ![]() |
11.9 (3.3, 25.2) |
Franklin County 6 | 128.4 (113.5, 144.8) | 27 (4, 76) | 58 |
rising ![]() |
9.1 (1.9, 23.1) |
Onslow County 6 | 127.8 (116.0, 140.4) | 28 (6, 67) | 91 |
stable ![]() |
4.8 (-4.6, 14.1) |
Sampson County 6 | 127.4 (112.1, 144.3) | 29 (3, 77) | 53 |
stable ![]() |
2.1 (-0.8, 12.3) |
Granville County 6 | 126.3 (111.2, 143.2) | 30 (3, 79) | 53 |
stable ![]() |
8.6 (-4.2, 23.5) |
Pender County 6 | 125.8 (110.6, 142.7) | 31 (3, 80) | 53 |
stable ![]() |
-0.8 (-2.9, 1.7) |
Columbus County 6 | 125.3 (109.7, 142.7) | 32 (3, 80) | 49 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-4.5, -0.4) |
Johnston County 6 | 124.4 (114.9, 134.5) | 33 (11, 66) | 139 |
stable ![]() |
4.6 (-1.5, 9.3) |
Lincoln County 6 | 123.3 (110.8, 137.0) | 34 (7, 77) | 75 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.7, -0.8) |
Harnett County 6 | 123.2 (111.3, 136.0) | 35 (7, 74) | 84 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-4.4, -0.4) |
Robeson County 6 | 123.2 (112.0, 135.3) | 36 (8, 73) | 95 |
falling ![]() |
-4.3 (-6.2, -2.5) |
Swain County 6 | 122.0 (92.4, 159.1) | 37 (1, 98) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
0.4 (-3.8, 5.5) |
Cleveland County 6 | 121.2 (109.4, 134.2) | 38 (8, 80) | 81 |
stable ![]() |
7.3 (-1.0, 14.1) |
New Hanover County 6 | 120.6 (112.6, 129.0) | 39 (17, 70) | 177 |
rising ![]() |
11.6 (4.2, 21.9) |
Wilson County 6 | 120.0 (106.6, 134.7) | 40 (8, 85) | 62 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.7, -0.3) |
Bertie County 6 | 119.9 (95.3, 149.9) | 41 (2, 96) | 18 |
falling ![]() |
-4.3 (-7.2, -1.4) |
Washington County 6 | 119.2 (90.9, 156.2) | 42 (1, 99) | 13 |
stable ![]() |
-2.9 (-6.5, 0.8) |
Stanly County 6 | 117.6 (103.3, 133.6) | 43 (9, 87) | 51 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-3.1, 2.1) |
Perquimans County 6 | 117.2 (91.1, 150.9) | 44 (1, 99) | 15 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-3.0, 2.5) |
Duplin County 6 | 117.1 (102.3, 133.8) | 45 (8, 88) | 47 |
stable ![]() |
-1.4 (-3.3, 0.7) |
Rowan County 6 | 117.0 (107.1, 127.7) | 46 (19, 80) | 108 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-6.4, -1.2) |
Forsyth County 6 | 116.9 (110.5, 123.6) | 47 (28, 72) | 260 |
stable ![]() |
0.9 (-3.6, 4.8) |
Chatham County 6 | 116.8 (104.7, 130.2) | 48 (14, 84) | 70 |
stable ![]() |
2.9 (-1.9, 10.7) |
Gaston County 6 | 116.7 (108.5, 125.4) | 49 (23, 77) | 159 |
stable ![]() |
2.8 (-0.3, 9.6) |
Rutherford County 6 | 116.7 (103.4, 131.4) | 50 (12, 86) | 59 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-3.1, 1.3) |
Orange County 6 | 116.6 (105.8, 128.3) | 51 (17, 82) | 92 |
stable ![]() |
10.3 (-2.7, 19.6) |
Warren County 6 | 116.2 (94.4, 143.0) | 52 (3, 97) | 21 |
stable ![]() |
-0.8 (-3.6, 5.8) |
Pamlico County 6 | 116.0 (90.7, 149.0) | 53 (2, 98) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.8, -1.5) |
Rockingham County 6 | 116.0 (104.5, 128.6) | 54 (16, 83) | 78 |
stable ![]() |
-1.2 (-2.4, 0.0) |
Alamance County 6 | 115.9 (106.5, 125.9) | 55 (21, 80) | 117 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-5.0, -0.8) |
Pitt County 6 | 115.9 (105.6, 126.8) | 56 (20, 82) | 101 |
falling ![]() |
-3.8 (-5.3, -2.3) |
Haywood County 6 | 115.5 (102.7, 129.8) | 57 (14, 88) | 62 |
stable ![]() |
-1.8 (-3.8, 0.2) |
Hertford County 6 | 112.6 (90.5, 139.3) | 58 (4, 98) | 19 |
falling ![]() |
-8.3 (-19.1, -4.8) |
Alexander County 6 | 111.8 (94.6, 131.6) | 59 (11, 95) | 31 |
stable ![]() |
-1.8 (-3.8, 0.4) |
Buncombe County 6 | 111.1 (104.2, 118.5) | 60 (33, 83) | 200 |
stable ![]() |
2.7 (-3.8, 10.2) |
Greene County 6 | 110.9 (86.3, 140.8) | 61 (3, 99) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-6.7, -0.1) |
Henderson County 6 | 110.6 (101.4, 120.7) | 62 (29, 86) | 110 |
stable ![]() |
4.2 (-0.6, 12.8) |
Randolph County 6 | 110.4 (101.2, 120.4) | 63 (31, 87) | 108 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-6.3, -2.0) |
Polk County 6 | 110.4 (90.5, 135.2) | 64 (6, 98) | 23 |
stable ![]() |
0.4 (-1.8, 2.9) |
Chowan County 6 | 109.9 (82.6, 144.8) | 65 (2, 99) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
-2.0 (-4.9, 0.9) |
Ashe County 6 | 109.6 (91.3, 131.5) | 66 (9, 97) | 27 |
stable ![]() |
5.2 (-4.5, 22.3) |
Vance County 6 | 109.6 (92.3, 129.4) | 67 (12, 96) | 31 |
stable ![]() |
7.2 (-3.4, 17.8) |
Nash County 6 | 109.2 (97.7, 121.7) | 68 (28, 90) | 70 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-5.2, -0.7) |
Beaufort County 6 | 108.0 (93.5, 124.6) | 69 (19, 95) | 42 |
rising ![]() |
9.4 (1.6, 19.0) |
Burke County 6 | 108.0 (97.1, 120.0) | 70 (30, 91) | 73 |
rising ![]() |
12.0 (4.0, 19.6) |
Avery County 6 | 106.6 (83.5, 135.2) | 71 (6, 99) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-3.8, -0.1) |
Brunswick County 6 | 106.4 (98.7, 114.8) | 72 (40, 88) | 165 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-2.2, 1.1) |
Dare County 6 | 105.5 (89.5, 124.3) | 73 (20, 96) | 33 |
stable ![]() |
-2.3 (-4.4, 0.0) |
Watauga County 6 | 105.0 (89.8, 122.3) | 74 (21, 96) | 36 |
stable ![]() |
-2.3 (-4.4, 0.1) |
Transylvania County 6 | 104.7 (89.4, 122.8) | 75 (21, 97) | 36 |
rising ![]() |
4.6 (0.4, 11.8) |
Person County 6 | 104.7 (88.4, 123.6) | 76 (20, 98) | 31 |
falling ![]() |
-4.3 (-6.6, -1.9) |
Bladen County 6 | 104.3 (86.9, 124.7) | 77 (17, 98) | 27 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-3.8, -0.2) |
Alleghany County 6 | 103.6 (77.3, 139.0) | 78 (4, 100) | 11 |
stable ![]() |
-2.3 (-5.3, 0.8) |
Macon County 6 | 103.3 (88.0, 121.3) | 79 (24, 97) | 35 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.1, -1.0) |
Surry County 6 | 103.2 (91.0, 116.9) | 80 (33, 95) | 53 |
stable ![]() |
-1.9 (-4.2, 0.4) |
Mitchell County 6 | 102.9 (79.9, 132.4) | 81 (7, 99) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
-2.5 (-4.9, 0.0) |
Caldwell County 6 | 101.9 (90.7, 114.4) | 82 (35, 96) | 63 |
stable ![]() |
0.3 (-8.4, 9.9) |
Madison County 6 | 100.8 (79.9, 126.4) | 83 (13, 100) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-6.6, -1.4) |
Davidson County 6 | 99.6 (91.4, 108.4) | 84 (56, 95) | 114 |
stable ![]() |
0.3 (-5.4, 8.1) |
McDowell County 6 | 98.4 (83.7, 115.2) | 85 (35, 98) | 34 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-5.1, -1.0) |
Jackson County 6 | 98.3 (82.6, 116.4) | 86 (28, 99) | 29 |
rising ![]() |
13.3 (0.2, 27.2) |
Clay County 6 | 95.0 (70.5, 128.7) | 87 (12, 100) | 11 |
stable ![]() |
-3.3 (-7.0, 0.5) |
Currituck County 6 | 93.9 (75.0, 116.6) | 88 (26, 100) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
-3.3 (-6.6, 0.3) |
Stokes County 6 | 93.5 (79.5, 109.7) | 89 (45, 99) | 33 |
stable ![]() |
-6.3 (-22.1, 0.6) |
Cherokee County 6 | 92.5 (77.0, 111.4) | 90 (42, 100) | 27 |
stable ![]() |
0.2 (-3.6, 4.6) |
Davie County 6 | 91.2 (77.1, 107.6) | 91 (52, 100) | 30 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-6.2, -0.5) |
Camden County 6 | 89.4 (60.2, 129.3) | 92 (5, 100) | 6 |
stable ![]() |
-3.5 (-9.1, 2.7) |
Yancey County 6 | 88.6 (68.5, 114.2) | 93 (31, 100) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
11.4 (-2.4, 22.6) |
Scotland County 6 | 87.2 (70.6, 106.9) | 94 (44, 100) | 20 |
falling ![]() |
-10.7 (-16.8, -7.9) |
Montgomery County 6 | 86.9 (69.6, 108.0) | 95 (43, 100) | 18 |
falling ![]() |
-7.8 (-24.1, -3.5) |
Yadkin County 6 | 86.2 (71.4, 103.7) | 96 (59, 100) | 24 |
falling ![]() |
-6.1 (-23.0, -2.0) |
Carteret County 6 | 84.7 (74.7, 96.0) | 97 (76, 100) | 55 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-7.5, 7.7) |
Wilkes County 6 | 78.3 (67.9, 90.2) | 98 (83, 100) | 42 |
falling ![]() |
-4.7 (-7.7, -1.9) |
Gates County 6 | 74.8 (51.6, 107.3) | 99 (42, 100) | 7 |
falling ![]() |
-5.3 (-9.7, -1.0) |
Graham County 6 | 56.3 (34.4, 90.3) | 100 (75, 100) | 4 |
stable ![]() |
-3.7 (-8.3, 0.8) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2023 10:12 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2023 10:12 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.