Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 18.3 (17.9, 18.6) | N/A | 2,325 | rising | 0.8 (0.4, 1.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 17.2 (17.1, 17.2) | N/A | 65,490 | rising | 1.2 (1.0, 1.7) |
Yancey County 6 | 12.4 (6.6, 21.5) | 88 (8, 90) | 3 | stable | 3.1 (-5.1, 13.4) |
Currituck County 6 | 8.2 (4.7, 13.8) | 90 (72, 90) | 3 | stable | -3.1 (-9.1, 3.6) |
Mitchell County 6 | 13.1 (7.3, 22.7) | 86 (7, 90) | 3 | stable | 4.1 (-1.9, 12.2) |
Avery County 6 | 15.3 (9.2, 24.7) | 82 (3, 90) | 4 |
|
|
Pamlico County 6 | 23.4 (13.7, 38.3) | 11 (1, 89) | 4 | stable | 2.8 (-2.0, 8.8) |
Northampton County 6 | 15.7 (9.3, 25.4) | 76 (2, 90) | 5 | rising | 17.8 (3.7, 48.6) |
Swain County 6 | 24.1 (15.2, 36.9) | 7 (1, 89) | 5 |
|
|
Greene County 6 | 17.1 (10.9, 26.0) | 67 (1, 90) | 5 | stable | 1.6 (-3.2, 7.7) |
Madison County 6 | 17.0 (10.6, 26.2) | 68 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
Chowan County 6 | 25.8 (16.2, 39.5) | 2 (1, 87) | 6 | stable | 3.4 (-2.1, 9.7) |
Hertford County 6 | 17.3 (11.3, 25.6) | 66 (1, 90) | 6 | stable | 0.2 (-4.0, 4.6) |
Anson County 6 | 18.9 (12.5, 27.7) | 50 (1, 89) | 6 |
|
|
Bertie County 6 | 21.5 (14.0, 32.0) | 21 (1, 89) | 6 | stable | 0.4 (-3.9, 5.5) |
Dare County 6 | 11.0 (7.2, 16.3) | 89 (44, 90) | 6 | stable | -0.4 (-6.4, 6.5) |
Martin County 6 | 19.3 (12.6, 28.5) | 46 (1, 89) | 6 | stable | 1.9 (-2.4, 6.9) |
Caswell County 6 | 22.4 (15.1, 32.2) | 20 (1, 88) | 7 | stable | 2.2 (-3.0, 8.6) |
Cherokee County 6 | 15.3 (10.0, 22.6) | 83 (4, 90) | 7 | stable | 3.8 (-0.4, 9.3) |
Ashe County 6 | 15.5 (10.6, 22.5) | 79 (7, 90) | 7 | stable | -1.2 (-4.4, 2.3) |
Polk County 6 | 21.3 (14.0, 31.6) | 23 (1, 89) | 7 |
|
|
Warren County 6 | 27.6 (18.6, 39.8) | 1 (1, 84) | 7 |
|
|
Montgomery County 6 | 20.0 (13.7, 28.4) | 38 (1, 89) | 7 | stable | 3.6 (-0.2, 8.3) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 16.7 (11.7, 23.1) | 69 (6, 90) | 8 | stable | -14.2 (-29.0, 2.5) |
Transylvania County 6 | 12.6 (8.7, 18.1) | 87 (36, 90) | 8 | stable | -12.2 (-23.5, 3.0) |
Jackson County 6 | 15.5 (10.8, 21.5) | 80 (11, 90) | 8 | stable | 4.1 (-0.2, 9.7) |
Bladen County 6 | 20.5 (14.7, 28.1) | 30 (1, 88) | 10 | stable | 4.0 (-0.3, 9.8) |
Watauga County 6 | 15.5 (11.3, 21.0) | 78 (13, 89) | 10 | stable | 24.0 (-0.8, 50.5) |
Yadkin County 6 | 18.6 (13.6, 25.1) | 55 (2, 89) | 10 | stable | -2.3 (-32.0, 12.8) |
Alexander County 6 | 19.7 (14.4, 26.5) | 41 (1, 88) | 10 | stable | -0.7 (-5.7, 4.4) |
Hoke County 6 | 21.2 (15.6, 28.0) | 24 (1, 87) | 11 | stable | 4.3 (-7.8, 20.0) |
Scotland County 6 | 23.0 (17.0, 30.6) | 14 (1, 84) | 11 | stable | 2.1 (-2.3, 7.6) |
Macon County 6 | 17.6 (12.7, 24.1) | 58 (3, 89) | 11 | stable | 2.8 (-1.0, 7.7) |
Vance County 6 | 20.6 (15.3, 27.1) | 29 (1, 87) | 11 | stable | -1.5 (-4.7, 2.0) |
Person County 6 | 20.1 (15.1, 26.4) | 37 (1, 86) | 12 | stable | -1.6 (-5.1, 2.1) |
Davie County 6 | 19.5 (14.7, 25.6) | 44 (2, 88) | 12 | stable | 0.4 (-2.9, 4.3) |
Duplin County 6 | 16.4 (12.4, 21.2) | 71 (13, 89) | 13 | stable | 1.1 (-4.0, 7.3) |
Richmond County 6 | 20.9 (16.0, 27.1) | 26 (1, 86) | 13 | stable | 2.2 (-2.4, 7.8) |
Beaufort County 6 | 17.5 (13.3, 22.9) | 59 (6, 89) | 13 | stable | 1.2 (-1.5, 4.4) |
Stokes County 6 | 20.3 (15.5, 26.4) | 34 (1, 86) | 14 | stable | 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7) |
Franklin County 6 | 15.2 (11.7, 19.5) | 84 (21, 89) | 14 | stable | 2.8 (-1.0, 8.3) |
Sampson County 6 | 17.3 (13.4, 22.2) | 65 (8, 88) | 14 | stable | 1.3 (-2.8, 5.9) |
Halifax County 6 | 20.6 (15.9, 26.4) | 28 (1, 85) | 14 | stable | 2.7 (-0.7, 6.8) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 20.4 (15.8, 26.2) | 31 (1, 85) | 15 | stable | 0.5 (-3.3, 4.9) |
Lee County 6 | 19.3 (15.1, 24.4) | 45 (3, 86) | 15 | stable | 6.0 (-9.6, 28.7) |
McDowell County 6 | 23.9 (18.6, 30.3) | 9 (1, 78) | 15 | stable | 2.8 (-0.4, 6.8) |
Wilkes County 6 | 16.4 (12.7, 20.8) | 72 (13, 89) | 16 | stable | -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4) |
Columbus County 6 | 23.9 (18.8, 30.0) | 8 (1, 74) | 17 | rising | 3.7 (0.3, 8.1) |
Pender County 6 | 20.3 (16.1, 25.5) | 35 (2, 84) | 17 | stable | 1.7 (-0.5, 4.4) |
Lenoir County 6 | 23.3 (18.3, 29.2) | 12 (1, 76) | 17 | stable | 0.9 (-2.2, 4.3) |
Stanly County 6 | 21.4 (16.9, 26.7) | 22 (1, 82) | 18 | stable | 15.4 (-0.7, 29.5) |
Granville County 6 | 23.1 (18.5, 28.5) | 13 (1, 76) | 18 | stable | -0.5 (-3.7, 3.1) |
Rutherford County 6 | 20.2 (16.1, 25.1) | 36 (2, 85) | 19 | rising | 2.7 (0.7, 5.0) |
Chatham County 6 | 16.3 (13.0, 20.3) | 73 (18, 88) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-2.6, 4.1) |
Haywood County 6 | 21.1 (16.8, 26.3) | 25 (1, 82) | 20 | stable | 3.2 (-0.1, 7.4) |
Nash County 6 | 17.3 (14.1, 21.2) | 64 (15, 87) | 21 | stable | 0.0 (-18.0, 9.9) |
Wilson County 6 | 19.7 (16.0, 23.9) | 43 (4, 83) | 22 | rising | 2.3 (0.1, 5.0) |
Lincoln County 6 | 19.2 (15.7, 23.4) | 47 (6, 84) | 22 | stable | 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4) |
Carteret County 6 | 20.4 (16.4, 25.2) | 32 (2, 82) | 22 | stable | 0.9 (-3.3, 5.5) |
Surry County 6 | 22.9 (18.8, 27.7) | 16 (1, 71) | 24 | stable | 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1) |
Craven County 6 | 18.7 (15.3, 22.6) | 54 (10, 84) | 25 | stable | 0.5 (-3.0, 4.4) |
Harnett County 6 | 18.8 (15.7, 22.4) | 51 (8, 84) | 26 | rising | 2.5 (0.5, 5.1) |
Caldwell County 6 | 23.8 (19.8, 28.4) | 10 (1, 65) | 27 | stable | 1.9 (-0.5, 4.9) |
Henderson County 6 | 14.9 (12.3, 17.9) | 85 (41, 88) | 28 | stable | -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Moore County 6 | 18.2 (15.1, 21.7) | 56 (13, 86) | 28 | stable | 1.3 (-2.3, 5.6) |
Burke County 6 | 22.5 (18.8, 26.8) | 19 (1, 67) | 29 | rising | 2.8 (0.8, 5.1) |
Rockingham County 6 | 24.2 (20.3, 28.7) | 6 (1, 55) | 31 | stable | 1.8 (-0.3, 4.0) |
Pitt County 6 | 16.5 (13.9, 19.4) | 70 (29, 87) | 31 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9) |
Onslow County 6 | 20.9 (17.7, 24.5) | 27 (4, 75) | 31 | stable | 0.6 (-1.6, 3.4) |
Orange County 6 | 20.4 (17.3, 23.9) | 33 (5, 77) | 33 | rising | 23.2 (4.8, 40.2) |
Cleveland County 6 | 25.3 (21.3, 29.7) | 3 (1, 46) | 33 | rising | 3.0 (0.3, 6.2) |
Robeson County 6 | 23.0 (19.5, 26.9) | 15 (1, 63) | 34 | rising | 6.2 (3.4, 13.7) |
Wayne County 6 | 24.4 (20.8, 28.4) | 5 (1, 53) | 36 | rising | 3.9 (1.5, 6.9) |
Rowan County 6 | 20.0 (17.1, 23.2) | 39 (8, 78) | 37 | stable | 1.0 (-0.7, 3.1) |
Iredell County 6 | 17.4 (15.0, 20.1) | 63 (24, 85) | 39 | stable | 1.5 (-0.1, 3.4) |
Catawba County 6 | 18.9 (16.3, 21.9) | 49 (12, 80) | 39 | stable | 1.9 (-0.5, 4.9) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 17.4 (15.1, 20.0) | 62 (24, 85) | 41 | stable | -1.3 (-3.4, 1.0) |
Johnston County 6 | 19.2 (16.7, 22.0) | 48 (12, 78) | 44 | rising | 2.0 (0.2, 4.2) |
Union County 6 | 17.5 (15.2, 20.0) | 60 (22, 83) | 44 | stable | -0.6 (-2.4, 1.7) |
Randolph County 6 | 24.8 (21.6, 28.3) | 4 (1, 40) | 47 | rising | 3.7 (2.2, 5.5) |
Alamance County 6 | 22.6 (19.8, 25.8) | 18 (2, 55) | 48 | rising | 3.1 (1.4, 5.2) |
Brunswick County 6 | 19.7 (16.8, 22.9) | 42 (6, 78) | 50 | stable | 2.1 (0.0, 4.7) |
Davidson County 6 | 22.8 (20.0, 26.0) | 17 (2, 52) | 51 | rising | 2.2 (0.8, 3.9) |
Gaston County 6 | 19.9 (17.5, 22.5) | 40 (9, 73) | 54 | stable | 1.0 (-0.9, 3.3) |
Durham County 6 | 16.2 (14.3, 18.3) | 75 (40, 86) | 54 | rising | 8.8 (1.7, 13.6) |
New Hanover County 6 | 18.7 (16.5, 21.2) | 53 (18, 78) | 55 | stable | -3.7 (-9.7, 3.2) |
Cumberland County 6 | 17.5 (15.4, 19.7) | 61 (27, 82) | 57 | rising | 2.2 (0.6, 4.2) |
Buncombe County 6 | 16.2 (14.4, 18.3) | 74 (40, 86) | 59 | rising | 1.4 (0.2, 2.8) |
Forsyth County 6 | 18.7 (17.0, 20.6) | 52 (23, 74) | 86 | stable | -0.5 (-2.9, 2.2) |
Guilford County 6 | 17.8 (16.3, 19.3) | 57 (33, 77) | 111 | stable | 0.4 (-1.1, 2.1) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 15.4 (14.3, 16.5) | 81 (60, 86) | 165 | stable | -0.6 (-4.0, 0.7) |
Wake County 6 | 15.6 (14.6, 16.7) | 77 (58, 85) | 173 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3) |
Alleghany County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/09/2024 7:34 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Clay, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/09/2024 7:34 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Clay, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.