Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 18.3 (17.9, 18.6) N/A 2,325 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.4, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.2 (17.1, 17.2) N/A 65,490 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.7)
Wake County 6 15.6 (14.6, 16.7) 77 (58, 85) 173 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
Mecklenburg County 6 15.4 (14.3, 16.5) 81 (60, 86) 165 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 0.7)
Guilford County 6 17.8 (16.3, 19.3) 57 (33, 77) 111 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.1)
Forsyth County 6 18.7 (17.0, 20.6) 52 (23, 74) 86 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.2)
Buncombe County 6 16.2 (14.4, 18.3) 74 (40, 86) 59 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.8)
Cumberland County 6 17.5 (15.4, 19.7) 61 (27, 82) 57 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 4.2)
New Hanover County 6 18.7 (16.5, 21.2) 53 (18, 78) 55 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.7, 3.2)
Durham County 6 16.2 (14.3, 18.3) 75 (40, 86) 54 rising rising trend 8.8 (1.7, 13.6)
Gaston County 6 19.9 (17.5, 22.5) 40 (9, 73) 54 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.3)
Davidson County 6 22.8 (20.0, 26.0) 17 (2, 52) 51 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.9)
Brunswick County 6 19.7 (16.8, 22.9) 42 (6, 78) 50 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.7)
Alamance County 6 22.6 (19.8, 25.8) 18 (2, 55) 48 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 5.2)
Randolph County 6 24.8 (21.6, 28.3) 4 (1, 40) 47 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.2, 5.5)
Union County 6 17.5 (15.2, 20.0) 60 (22, 83) 44 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.7)
Johnston County 6 19.2 (16.7, 22.0) 48 (12, 78) 44 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.2)
Cabarrus County 6 17.4 (15.1, 20.0) 62 (24, 85) 41 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.0)
Catawba County 6 18.9 (16.3, 21.9) 49 (12, 80) 39 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.9)
Iredell County 6 17.4 (15.0, 20.1) 63 (24, 85) 39 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.4)
Rowan County 6 20.0 (17.1, 23.2) 39 (8, 78) 37 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.1)
Wayne County 6 24.4 (20.8, 28.4) 5 (1, 53) 36 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 6.9)
Robeson County 6 23.0 (19.5, 26.9) 15 (1, 63) 34 rising rising trend 6.2 (3.4, 13.7)
Cleveland County 6 25.3 (21.3, 29.7) 3 (1, 46) 33 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.3, 6.2)
Orange County 6 20.4 (17.3, 23.9) 33 (5, 77) 33 rising rising trend 23.2 (4.8, 40.2)
Onslow County 6 20.9 (17.7, 24.5) 27 (4, 75) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.4)
Pitt County 6 16.5 (13.9, 19.4) 70 (29, 87) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Rockingham County 6 24.2 (20.3, 28.7) 6 (1, 55) 31 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.0)
Burke County 6 22.5 (18.8, 26.8) 19 (1, 67) 29 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.1)
Moore County 6 18.2 (15.1, 21.7) 56 (13, 86) 28 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.6)
Henderson County 6 14.9 (12.3, 17.9) 85 (41, 88) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Caldwell County 6 23.8 (19.8, 28.4) 10 (1, 65) 27 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.9)
Harnett County 6 18.8 (15.7, 22.4) 51 (8, 84) 26 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 5.1)
Craven County 6 18.7 (15.3, 22.6) 54 (10, 84) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.4)
Surry County 6 22.9 (18.8, 27.7) 16 (1, 71) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1)
Carteret County 6 20.4 (16.4, 25.2) 32 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.5)
Lincoln County 6 19.2 (15.7, 23.4) 47 (6, 84) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Wilson County 6 19.7 (16.0, 23.9) 43 (4, 83) 22 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 5.0)
Nash County 6 17.3 (14.1, 21.2) 64 (15, 87) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-18.0, 9.9)
Haywood County 6 21.1 (16.8, 26.3) 25 (1, 82) 20 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.1, 7.4)
Chatham County 6 16.3 (13.0, 20.3) 73 (18, 88) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 4.1)
Rutherford County 6 20.2 (16.1, 25.1) 36 (2, 85) 19 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 5.0)
Granville County 6 23.1 (18.5, 28.5) 13 (1, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 3.1)
Stanly County 6 21.4 (16.9, 26.7) 22 (1, 82) 18 stable stable trend 15.4 (-0.7, 29.5)
Lenoir County 6 23.3 (18.3, 29.2) 12 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.3)
Columbus County 6 23.9 (18.8, 30.0) 8 (1, 74) 17 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 8.1)
Pender County 6 20.3 (16.1, 25.5) 35 (2, 84) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.4)
Wilkes County 6 16.4 (12.7, 20.8) 72 (13, 89) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
McDowell County 6 23.9 (18.6, 30.3) 9 (1, 78) 15 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.8)
Lee County 6 19.3 (15.1, 24.4) 45 (3, 86) 15 stable stable trend 6.0 (-9.6, 28.7)
Edgecombe County 6 20.4 (15.8, 26.2) 31 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.9)
Halifax County 6 20.6 (15.9, 26.4) 28 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 6.8)
Sampson County 6 17.3 (13.4, 22.2) 65 (8, 88) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.8, 5.9)
Franklin County 6 15.2 (11.7, 19.5) 84 (21, 89) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 8.3)
Stokes County 6 20.3 (15.5, 26.4) 34 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7)
Beaufort County 6 17.5 (13.3, 22.9) 59 (6, 89) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.4)
Richmond County 6 20.9 (16.0, 27.1) 26 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.4, 7.8)
Duplin County 6 16.4 (12.4, 21.2) 71 (13, 89) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.0, 7.3)
Davie County 6 19.5 (14.7, 25.6) 44 (2, 88) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 4.3)
Person County 6 20.1 (15.1, 26.4) 37 (1, 86) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.1)
Vance County 6 20.6 (15.3, 27.1) 29 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 2.0)
Macon County 6 17.6 (12.7, 24.1) 58 (3, 89) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 7.7)
Hoke County 6 21.2 (15.6, 28.0) 24 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend 4.3 (-7.8, 20.0)
Scotland County 6 23.0 (17.0, 30.6) 14 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 7.6)
Alexander County 6 19.7 (14.4, 26.5) 41 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.7, 4.4)
Yadkin County 6 18.6 (13.6, 25.1) 55 (2, 89) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-32.0, 12.8)
Watauga County 6 15.5 (11.3, 21.0) 78 (13, 89) 10 stable stable trend 24.0 (-0.8, 50.5)
Bladen County 6 20.5 (14.7, 28.1) 30 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.3, 9.8)
Jackson County 6 15.5 (10.8, 21.5) 80 (11, 90) 8 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.2, 9.7)
Transylvania County 6 12.6 (8.7, 18.1) 87 (36, 90) 8 stable stable trend -12.2 (-23.5, 3.0)
Pasquotank County 6 16.7 (11.7, 23.1) 69 (6, 90) 8 stable stable trend -14.2 (-29.0, 2.5)
Montgomery County 6 20.0 (13.7, 28.4) 38 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.2, 8.3)
Ashe County 6 15.5 (10.6, 22.5) 79 (7, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.3)
Polk County 6 21.3 (14.0, 31.6) 23 (1, 89) 7
*
*
Warren County 6 27.6 (18.6, 39.8) 1 (1, 84) 7
*
*
Cherokee County 6 15.3 (10.0, 22.6) 83 (4, 90) 7 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.4, 9.3)
Caswell County 6 22.4 (15.1, 32.2) 20 (1, 88) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.0, 8.6)
Martin County 6 19.3 (12.6, 28.5) 46 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 6.9)
Bertie County 6 21.5 (14.0, 32.0) 21 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.5)
Dare County 6 11.0 (7.2, 16.3) 89 (44, 90) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.4, 6.5)
Anson County 6 18.9 (12.5, 27.7) 50 (1, 89) 6
*
*
Hertford County 6 17.3 (11.3, 25.6) 66 (1, 90) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.6)
Chowan County 6 25.8 (16.2, 39.5) 2 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.1, 9.7)
Greene County 6 17.1 (10.9, 26.0) 67 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 7.7)
Madison County 6 17.0 (10.6, 26.2) 68 (1, 90) 5
*
*
Swain County 6 24.1 (15.2, 36.9) 7 (1, 89) 5
*
*
Northampton County 6 15.7 (9.3, 25.4) 76 (2, 90) 5 rising rising trend 17.8 (3.7, 48.6)
Pamlico County 6 23.4 (13.7, 38.3) 11 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 8.8)
Avery County 6 15.3 (9.2, 24.7) 82 (3, 90) 4
*
*
Currituck County 6 8.2 (4.7, 13.8) 90 (72, 90) 3 stable stable trend -3.1 (-9.1, 3.6)
Mitchell County 6 13.1 (7.3, 22.7) 86 (7, 90) 3 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.9, 12.2)
Yancey County 6 12.4 (6.6, 21.5) 88 (8, 90) 3 stable stable trend 3.1 (-5.1, 13.4)
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2024 3:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Clay, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top