Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 6.4 (6.1, 6.6) N/A 741 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.3 (6.3, 6.3) N/A 22,899 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.3)
Pasquotank County 6 Rural 6.5 (3.6, 10.8) 36 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Edgecombe County 6 Urban 6.6 (3.8, 10.7) 30 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.0, 0.9)
Halifax County 6 Rural 6.0 (3.4, 9.9) 48 (2, 63) 4
*
*
Hoke County 6 Urban 7.0 (4.1, 11.3) 22 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 7.3)
Person County 6 Urban 7.4 (4.2, 12.2) 15 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 Rural 8.5 (4.7, 14.2) 7 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Beaufort County 6 Rural 7.4 (4.2, 12.0) 17 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Columbus County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.2, 8.5) 58 (5, 63) 4
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural 4.1 (2.4, 6.7) 63 (18, 63) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.0, 4.0)
Lee County 6 Rural 5.4 (3.3, 8.5) 56 (5, 63) 4
*
*
Richmond County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.6, 14.2) 6 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Stokes County 6 Urban 8.3 (5.0, 13.1) 10 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.9, 3.5)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 4.7 (2.8, 7.4) 59 (10, 63) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.4)
Sampson County 6 Rural 6.5 (4.0, 9.9) 35 (2, 63) 5
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.9, 19.1) 1 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Transylvania County 6 Rural 9.2 (5.4, 14.9) 5 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.9, 8.2)
Davie County 6 Urban 9.8 (6.1, 14.9) 4 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.8, 1.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.3, 15.7) 3 (1, 60) 5 rising rising trend 12.4 (3.1, 41.4)
Granville County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.6, 11.0) 19 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.5, 4.8)
Pender County 6 Urban 7.4 (4.7, 11.0) 16 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.0, 4.6)
Duplin County 6 Rural 10.6 (6.9, 15.7) 2 (1, 57) 5 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.4, 11.4)
Lenoir County 6 Rural 6.5 (4.2, 9.9) 33 (2, 63) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 4.0)
Wilson County 6 Rural 5.7 (3.7, 8.4) 53 (5, 63) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.1, 8.0)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 4.6 (3.0, 6.9) 61 (16, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 2.7)
Surry County 6 Rural 6.0 (3.9, 9.0) 47 (5, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.0, 5.2)
Nash County 6 Urban 5.3 (3.6, 7.7) 57 (10, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 6.1)
Robeson County 6 Rural 4.6 (3.1, 6.7) 60 (18, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.4)
Stanly County 6 Rural 8.5 (5.6, 12.3) 8 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 4.8)
Wayne County 6 Urban 4.6 (3.1, 6.6) 62 (19, 63) 6 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.3, -4.8)
Franklin County 6 Urban 8.3 (5.6, 12.0) 9 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 5.3)
Carteret County 6 Rural 6.1 (4.1, 9.1) 43 (5, 63) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.2, 2.8)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.0, 8.7) 46 (5, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.4, 4.1)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 6.7 (4.6, 9.5) 26 (3, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.9, 3.6)
Cleveland County 6 Rural 6.1 (4.1, 8.7) 44 (5, 63) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.6)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 8.2 (5.6, 11.8) 11 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
Harnett County 6 Rural 5.7 (4.0, 7.8) 51 (8, 63) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.1)
Chatham County 6 Urban 6.3 (4.3, 9.0) 37 (4, 63) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 5.4)
Craven County 6 Rural 6.6 (4.7, 9.2) 28 (4, 63) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.4, 0.3)
Burke County 6 Urban 7.1 (4.9, 9.8) 21 (3, 62) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.3)
Orange County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 41 (6, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.3)
Moore County 6 Urban 8.1 (5.9, 11.0) 12 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.5)
Henderson County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.0, 9.2) 24 (4, 61) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.1)
Pitt County 6 Urban 7.1 (5.3, 9.2) 20 (4, 60) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 6.4)
Alamance County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.7, 8.1) 42 (7, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 2.1)
Onslow County 6 Urban 7.5 (5.6, 9.7) 14 (3, 58) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.4)
Randolph County 6 Urban 7.3 (5.5, 9.5) 18 (3, 58) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 1.2)
Rowan County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.9, 8.5) 34 (6, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Catawba County 6 Urban 6.8 (5.2, 8.8) 25 (4, 60) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.3)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 39 (6, 62) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 4.1)
Davidson County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.1, 8.5) 31 (6, 60) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.6)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 6.3 (4.9, 7.9) 38 (9, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 2.0)
Iredell County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 23 (4, 58) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.6)
Johnston County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.4) 27 (6, 60) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.4)
Gaston County 6 Urban 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 49 (12, 63) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
New Hanover County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.9, 7.9) 40 (8, 61) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 9.3)
Union County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.3, 8.3) 29 (7, 60) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.7)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 5.5 (4.4, 6.8) 55 (19, 62) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.7)
Durham County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 52 (14, 62) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.7)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 5.5 (4.6, 6.7) 54 (20, 62) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 7.9 (6.5, 9.5) 13 (3, 46) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.4)
Guilford County 6 Urban 6.0 (5.1, 7.0) 45 (17, 59) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 5.7 (5.1, 6.4) 50 (26, 59) 62 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wake County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.9, 7.3) 32 (14, 49) 74 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Alexander County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/10/2024 10:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Caswell, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hertford, Hyde, Jones, Madison, Martin, McDowell, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Perquimans, Polk, Swain, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Yadkin, Yancey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top