Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | N/A | 18.0 (17.7, 18.4) | N/A | 2,243 | stable | 0.2 (-1.1, 2.2) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) | N/A | 71,542 | falling | -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5) |
Currituck County 6 | Urban | 10.0 (5.7, 16.6) | 92 (29, 92) | 3 | stable | -3.4 (-8.0, 1.2) |
Perquimans County 6 | Rural | 13.9 (8.3, 23.5) | 87 (3, 92) | 4 | falling | -3.7 (-7.4, -0.2) |
Chowan County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (10.4, 27.9) | 51 (1, 92) | 4 | rising | 4.6 (0.6, 10.1) |
Clay County 6 | Rural | 16.5 (9.9, 28.2) | 61 (1, 92) | 4 | stable | -0.4 (-6.3, 6.3) |
Hertford County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (8.5, 22.2) | 85 (4, 92) | 4 |
|
|
Swain County 6 | Rural | 21.7 (13.2, 34.1) | 10 (1, 92) | 4 | stable | -2.0 (-7.8, 3.8) |
Mitchell County 6 | Rural | 18.0 (10.9, 28.8) | 35 (1, 92) | 4 | stable | 0.4 (-5.9, 7.2) |
Anson County 6 | Urban | 15.4 (9.5, 23.8) | 75 (1, 92) | 5 | stable | 0.0 (-3.2, 3.3) |
Greene County 6 | Rural | 17.7 (11.0, 27.2) | 40 (1, 92) | 5 |
|
|
Bertie County 6 | Rural | 16.5 (10.3, 25.7) | 60 (1, 92) | 5 | rising | 7.4 (0.9, 29.8) |
Martin County 6 | Rural | 15.2 (9.3, 23.7) | 76 (1, 92) | 5 | stable | -0.4 (-4.5, 3.7) |
Polk County 6 | Rural | 12.1 (7.5, 19.7) | 91 (13, 92) | 5 | stable | 0.6 (-4.2, 6.1) |
Warren County 6 | Rural | 17.7 (11.0, 27.5) | 38 (1, 92) | 5 | stable | -0.7 (-7.7, 6.1) |
Caswell County 6 | Rural | 15.7 (10.0, 24.0) | 71 (1, 92) | 5 | stable | -0.8 (-6.1, 4.5) |
Northampton County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (11.1, 26.4) | 49 (1, 92) | 6 | stable | -3.3 (-8.1, 0.8) |
Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 22.1 (14.3, 34.5) | 8 (1, 91) | 6 |
|
|
Avery County 6 | Rural | 23.6 (15.6, 34.9) | 5 (1, 90) | 6 | stable | 2.7 (-2.9, 24.9) |
Madison County 6 | Urban | 18.8 (12.3, 27.8) | 26 (1, 92) | 6 |
|
|
Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 12.9 (8.8, 18.5) | 89 (15, 92) | 7 | stable | -0.4 (-6.3, 5.2) |
Hoke County 6 | Urban | 14.5 (9.8, 20.5) | 84 (5, 92) | 7 | stable | -2.2 (-7.0, 2.8) |
Scotland County 6 | Rural | 15.5 (10.6, 22.0) | 73 (3, 92) | 7 | stable | 0.3 (-2.8, 3.7) |
Yancey County 6 | Rural | 20.4 (14.0, 29.5) | 15 (1, 91) | 7 | stable | -0.5 (-4.5, 3.5) |
Dare County 6 | Rural | 12.4 (8.4, 17.8) | 90 (20, 92) | 7 | stable | -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1) |
Montgomery County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (14.1, 28.8) | 16 (1, 91) | 7 | stable | -0.9 (-4.7, 3.0) |
Ashe County 6 | Rural | 16.1 (11.0, 23.2) | 66 (2, 92) | 8 | stable | -2.0 (-7.9, 3.6) |
Bladen County 6 | Rural | 19.9 (14.0, 27.8) | 18 (1, 91) | 8 | stable | 1.7 (-2.3, 6.7) |
Watauga County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (9.9, 19.3) | 86 (12, 92) | 8 | falling | -4.4 (-7.2, -1.9) |
Jackson County 6 | Rural | 16.0 (11.3, 22.1) | 68 (3, 92) | 9 | stable | -1.7 (-5.5, 2.0) |
Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 16.0 (11.2, 22.6) | 69 (3, 92) | 9 | stable | -1.1 (-5.0, 3.2) |
Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 13.0 (9.3, 18.4) | 88 (19, 92) | 9 | stable | -2.2 (-5.7, 1.2) |
Richmond County 6 | Rural | 17.0 (12.5, 22.9) | 54 (2, 91) | 10 | stable | -1.7 (-4.7, 1.1) |
Vance County 6 | Rural | 18.5 (13.6, 24.8) | 28 (1, 91) | 10 | stable | -0.7 (-4.3, 3.0) |
Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (13.0, 23.6) | 42 (2, 91) | 10 | stable | 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5) |
Davie County 6 | Urban | 18.4 (13.5, 24.7) | 30 (1, 90) | 10 | stable | 0.5 (-3.3, 4.5) |
Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 15.7 (11.4, 21.0) | 72 (7, 92) | 10 | stable | 0.0 (-3.0, 3.0) |
Halifax County 6 | Rural | 15.4 (11.4, 20.6) | 74 (9, 92) | 11 | stable | 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0) |
Person County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (13.5, 24.3) | 33 (2, 90) | 11 | stable | -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4) |
McDowell County 6 | Rural | 16.4 (12.3, 21.6) | 63 (5, 91) | 11 | stable | -0.8 (-4.3, 2.8) |
Lee County 6 | Rural | 14.8 (11.0, 19.4) | 80 (11, 92) | 11 | stable | -1.3 (-4.8, 2.4) |
Alexander County 6 | Urban | 22.1 (16.7, 29.0) | 7 (1, 83) | 12 | stable | 1.7 (-1.6, 5.3) |
Columbus County 6 | Rural | 16.8 (12.7, 21.8) | 57 (5, 91) | 12 | stable | -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0) |
Sampson County 6 | Rural | 16.4 (12.5, 21.3) | 62 (7, 91) | 12 | stable | -0.5 (-2.9, 2.0) |
Macon County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (12.9, 22.8) | 50 (4, 91) | 13 | stable | -1.1 (-4.1, 2.3) |
Duplin County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (14.5, 24.6) | 24 (1, 88) | 13 | stable | 1.9 (-0.2, 4.2) |
Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (15.7, 27.3) | 13 (1, 86) | 13 | stable | -0.4 (-3.8, 3.3) |
Stokes County 6 | Urban | 19.8 (15.2, 25.6) | 20 (1, 88) | 14 | stable | 0.3 (-2.6, 3.6) |
Franklin County 6 | Urban | 17.1 (13.2, 21.7) | 53 (5, 90) | 15 | stable | -0.7 (-2.9, 1.7) |
Wilson County 6 | Rural | 14.7 (11.5, 18.7) | 81 (16, 92) | 15 | stable | 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8) |
Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 19.9 (15.5, 25.3) | 19 (1, 86) | 15 | stable | 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 16.6 (12.9, 21.1) | 58 (7, 90) | 15 | stable | 0.5 (-1.7, 2.9) |
Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 17.3 (13.5, 21.9) | 48 (5, 90) | 16 | stable | 0.6 (-2.9, 4.5) |
Pender County 6 | Urban | 21.4 (17.0, 26.8) | 11 (1, 76) | 17 | stable | -0.6 (-3.5, 2.6) |
Stanly County 6 | Rural | 20.5 (16.3, 25.6) | 14 (1, 79) | 17 | falling | -2.6 (-6.3, -0.6) |
Granville County 6 | Rural | 23.0 (18.3, 28.6) | 6 (1, 69) | 17 | stable | 1.0 (-1.8, 4.0) |
Surry County 6 | Rural | 16.5 (13.2, 20.6) | 59 (9, 91) | 18 | stable | -6.3 (-25.1, 0.7) |
Carteret County 6 | Rural | 14.9 (11.8, 18.7) | 78 (17, 92) | 18 | stable | -2.3 (-6.0, 1.8) |
Nash County 6 | Urban | 14.7 (11.8, 18.2) | 82 (20, 91) | 19 | falling | -10.2 (-17.9, -5.7) |
Burke County 6 | Urban | 14.8 (11.9, 18.3) | 79 (20, 91) | 19 | stable | -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9) |
Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 15.1 (12.2, 18.6) | 77 (15, 91) | 20 | stable | -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8) |
Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 18.4 (14.9, 22.5) | 29 (4, 87) | 21 | stable | 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3) |
Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 16.0 (12.9, 19.6) | 67 (13, 90) | 21 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6) |
Robeson County 6 | Rural | 15.8 (12.9, 19.3) | 70 (13, 90) | 21 | falling | -21.2 (-34.0, -12.1) |
Harnett County 6 | Rural | 16.3 (13.3, 19.7) | 64 (13, 89) | 22 | falling | -10.4 (-19.4, -2.7) |
Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (16.5, 24.7) | 17 (1, 79) | 22 | stable | 0.9 (-1.7, 3.9) |
Haywood County 6 | Rural | 23.8 (19.5, 29.0) | 3 (1, 53) | 24 | rising | 10.9 (0.4, 22.9) |
Wayne County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (14.0, 20.5) | 56 (11, 88) | 24 | stable | 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6) |
Craven County 6 | Rural | 19.4 (16.0, 23.3) | 22 (2, 80) | 26 | stable | 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5) |
Chatham County 6 | Urban | 25.5 (21.1, 30.6) | 1 (1, 30) | 29 | rising | 3.0 (1.1, 5.4) |
Moore County 6 | Urban | 18.9 (15.8, 22.5) | 25 (4, 81) | 29 | stable | 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4) |
Catawba County 6 | Urban | 14.5 (12.2, 17.1) | 83 (31, 91) | 30 | stable | -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2) |
Randolph County 6 | Urban | 16.1 (13.6, 19.0) | 65 (17, 88) | 31 | stable | -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0) |
Onslow County 6 | Urban | 19.8 (16.7, 23.2) | 21 (2, 74) | 31 | stable | 1.0 (-1.8, 4.4) |
Pitt County 6 | Urban | 18.3 (15.5, 21.5) | 31 (7, 82) | 31 | stable | 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3) |
Rowan County 6 | Urban | 17.1 (14.5, 20.1) | 52 (12, 86) | 32 | stable | -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3) |
Orange County 6 | Urban | 23.7 (20.3, 27.6) | 4 (1, 38) | 37 | rising | 1.6 (0.2, 3.3) |
Iredell County 6 | Urban | 17.5 (15.1, 20.2) | 46 (12, 82) | 39 | stable | -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3) |
Johnston County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.5, 20.7) | 36 (9, 80) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-2.5, 2.2) |
Davidson County 6 | Urban | 18.6 (16.0, 21.4) | 27 (7, 76) | 42 | stable | -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5) |
Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 18.0 (15.6, 20.6) | 34 (9, 80) | 42 | falling | -3.6 (-11.7, -1.3) |
Alamance County 6 | Urban | 21.9 (19.0, 25.0) | 9 (1, 53) | 45 | stable | 1.1 (-0.7, 3.2) |
Henderson County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (20.7, 27.5) | 2 (1, 31) | 46 | stable | -0.4 (-2.7, 2.1) |
Union County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (15.9, 20.8) | 32 (10, 78) | 46 | stable | -1.1 (-2.9, 1.0) |
Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 17.4 (15.0, 20.3) | 47 (11, 83) | 48 | stable | -1.0 (-3.2, 1.6) |
Gaston County 6 | Urban | 17.7 (15.5, 20.2) | 39 (12, 79) | 48 | stable | -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3) |
Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (15.0, 19.2) | 55 (16, 81) | 55 | stable | -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3) |
Durham County 6 | Urban | 17.5 (15.5, 19.7) | 44 (15, 78) | 58 | stable | -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8) |
New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 20.9 (18.5, 23.5) | 12 (3, 53) | 59 | rising | 4.1 (1.0, 12.8) |
Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 17.7 (15.7, 19.8) | 41 (15, 77) | 65 | stable | -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0) |
Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (16.0, 19.6) | 37 (16, 75) | 80 | stable | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
Guilford County 6 | Urban | 17.5 (16.0, 19.1) | 45 (20, 73) | 108 | stable | -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (16.5, 18.8) | 43 (21, 68) | 184 | falling | -1.0 (-5.3, -0.1) |
Wake County 6 | Urban | 19.2 (18.0, 20.4) | 23 (12, 53) | 209 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8) |
Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/11/2024 4:58 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/11/2024 4:58 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.