Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 17.6 (17.3, 17.9) N/A 2,196 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) N/A 70,394 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -0.9)
Yancey County 6 17.7 (11.7, 26.6) 35 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 2.2)
Yadkin County 6 17.6 (12.9, 23.6) 39 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.9)
Wilson County 6 13.9 (10.8, 17.6) 82 (19, 92) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.4)
Wilkes County 6 16.2 (12.6, 20.5) 53 (7, 90) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.5)
Wayne County 6 16.9 (13.9, 20.3) 51 (8, 86) 25 falling falling trend -14.4 (-24.4, -1.1)
Watauga County 6 14.9 (10.7, 20.4) 70 (7, 92) 9 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.2, -2.1)
Warren County 6 12.9 (7.5, 21.3) 86 (4, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-9.6, 5.0)
Wake County 6 19.2 (18.0, 20.5) 17 (9, 45) 204 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Vance County 6 15.8 (11.5, 21.4) 57 (4, 91) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.0, 2.3)
Union County 6 18.4 (16.0, 21.0) 26 (6, 70) 46 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.2)
Transylvania County 6 14.3 (10.0, 20.1) 77 (7, 92) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.3, 1.1)
Swain County 6 22.7 (14.0, 35.4) 4 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.6, 4.7)
Surry County 6 16.9 (13.5, 21.0) 50 (5, 87) 18 stable stable trend -12.1 (-28.6, 3.6)
Stokes County 6 19.4 (14.8, 25.2) 15 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.4)
Stanly County 6 19.1 (15.0, 24.0) 19 (1, 85) 16 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.1, -2.0)
Scotland County 6 14.5 (9.8, 20.8) 74 (5, 92) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.9)
Sampson County 6 15.6 (11.9, 20.3) 60 (6, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.5)
Rutherford County 6 17.1 (13.4, 21.6) 47 (4, 88) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.2)
Rowan County 6 18.6 (15.8, 21.7) 25 (4, 77) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Rockingham County 6 16.0 (13.0, 19.7) 55 (10, 89) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.7)
Robeson County 6 15.3 (12.5, 18.4) 66 (17, 90) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-12.5, 7.7)
Richmond County 6 15.3 (11.1, 20.7) 63 (4, 92) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-18.2, -1.6)
Randolph County 6 15.5 (13.1, 18.4) 62 (14, 88) 30 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.4)
Polk County 6 11.6 (7.5, 18.3) 91 (20, 92) 5 falling falling trend -22.4 (-44.4, -0.9)
Pitt County 6 15.1 (12.7, 18.0) 67 (17, 89) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 1.0)
Person County 6 17.7 (13.1, 23.5) 38 (1, 90) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 1.3)
Perquimans County 6 12.0 (6.9, 21.0) 90 (9, 92) 3 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.6, -1.3)
Pender County 6 19.1 (15.0, 24.1) 18 (1, 84) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.8)
Pasquotank County 6 12.5 (8.4, 18.1) 88 (15, 92) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 3.4)
Pamlico County 6 17.0 (10.6, 28.0) 48 (1, 92) 5
*
*
Orange County 6 24.1 (20.6, 28.0) 3 (1, 31) 36 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Onslow County 6 21.2 (18.0, 24.8) 8 (1, 58) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.9)
Northampton County 6 16.0 (10.2, 24.6) 56 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.3, 0.9)
New Hanover County 6 19.0 (16.8, 21.5) 21 (5, 64) 55 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.3)
Nash County 6 14.8 (11.9, 18.2) 72 (15, 91) 19 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.9, -4.8)
Moore County 6 17.3 (14.4, 20.8) 44 (5, 83) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Montgomery County 6 19.7 (13.5, 28.0) 13 (1, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.5)
Mitchell County 6 15.3 (8.7, 25.8) 64 (1, 92) 4 falling falling trend -16.7 (-46.8, -1.4)
Mecklenburg County 6 16.9 (15.8, 18.1) 49 (22, 68) 174 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.8, -0.7)
McDowell County 6 17.5 (13.2, 23.0) 41 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 3.7)
Martin County 6 18.6 (12.1, 27.6) 24 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.6)
Madison County 6 17.7 (11.7, 26.3) 36 (1, 92) 6
*
*
Macon County 6 18.2 (13.7, 24.2) 28 (1, 88) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 3.3)
Lincoln County 6 18.8 (15.2, 23.0) 22 (2, 82) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 3.0)
Lenoir County 6 20.4 (15.9, 25.7) 9 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1)
Lee County 6 14.9 (11.1, 19.6) 71 (8, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.9)
Johnston County 6 19.5 (16.9, 22.4) 14 (3, 64) 42 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.4)
Jackson County 6 13.4 (9.1, 19.0) 85 (10, 92) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.8, -0.2)
Iredell County 6 17.4 (15.0, 20.2) 43 (8, 78) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.7)
Hoke County 6 12.2 (7.9, 17.8) 89 (15, 92) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.0, 2.7)
Hertford County 6 14.1 (8.6, 22.0) 81 (3, 92) 5
*
*
Henderson County 6 22.6 (19.4, 26.2) 5 (1, 39) 43 stable stable trend 13.1 (-1.3, 26.1)
Haywood County 6 19.8 (15.8, 24.7) 12 (1, 78) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.3)
Harnett County 6 17.7 (14.6, 21.3) 37 (5, 83) 24 stable stable trend -9.2 (-20.5, 2.3)
Halifax County 6 14.4 (10.5, 19.4) 76 (7, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.9)
Guilford County 6 18.2 (16.7, 19.8) 27 (11, 59) 112 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Greene County 6 15.3 (9.3, 24.0) 65 (1, 92) 4
*
*
Granville County 6 24.5 (19.6, 30.2) 1 (1, 50) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.3)
Gaston County 6 17.5 (15.2, 19.9) 42 (10, 76) 47 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.1)
Franklin County 6 15.7 (12.1, 20.1) 59 (7, 91) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.4)
Forsyth County 6 18.0 (16.3, 19.9) 29 (10, 65) 81 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Edgecombe County 6 12.9 (9.3, 17.6) 87 (18, 92) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.5)
Durham County 6 17.3 (15.3, 19.5) 45 (11, 75) 56 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.8)
Duplin County 6 18.0 (13.9, 22.9) 30 (2, 86) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.8)
Davie County 6 17.1 (12.3, 23.2) 46 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 4.2)
Davidson County 6 17.8 (15.4, 20.6) 32 (7, 76) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Dare County 6 14.1 (9.9, 19.9) 79 (8, 92) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 3.0)
Currituck County 6 10.8 (6.3, 17.4) 92 (19, 92) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.3, 2.0)
Cumberland County 6 16.6 (14.7, 18.8) 52 (17, 80) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.1)
Craven County 6 20.2 (16.7, 24.2) 10 (1, 72) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Columbus County 6 15.1 (11.4, 19.7) 68 (7, 92) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 2.0)
Cleveland County 6 15.6 (12.6, 19.1) 61 (12, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Clay County 6 14.2 (8.1, 25.5) 78 (2, 92) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.0, 8.2)
Chowan County 6 18.7 (11.8, 29.5) 23 (1, 92) 5 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.1, 11.7)
Cherokee County 6 15.0 (10.4, 21.4) 69 (3, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 4.5)
Chatham County 6 24.3 (20.0, 29.3) 2 (1, 42) 27 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.7, 5.8)
Catawba County 6 13.7 (11.5, 16.2) 83 (36, 91) 29 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Caswell County 6 13.7 (8.4, 21.3) 84 (3, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.2, 4.8)
Carteret County 6 14.1 (11.2, 17.7) 80 (21, 91) 18 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.8, 2.4)
Caldwell County 6 19.0 (15.5, 23.2) 20 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 4.0)
Cabarrus County 6 18.0 (15.5, 20.7) 31 (7, 76) 40 falling falling trend -4.5 (-16.9, -1.5)
Burke County 6 14.7 (11.9, 18.2) 73 (17, 91) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.5)
Buncombe County 6 17.5 (15.6, 19.7) 40 (11, 72) 63 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.1)
Brunswick County 6 16.2 (13.8, 18.9) 54 (15, 85) 45 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.4)
Bladen County 6 19.3 (13.7, 26.6) 16 (1, 91) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 7.2)
Bertie County 6 15.7 (9.7, 24.7) 58 (1, 92) 5 rising rising trend 12.8 (3.2, 38.8)
Beaufort County 6 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 33 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.5, 3.1)
Avery County 6 22.2 (14.4, 33.2) 6 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-18.2, 28.9)
Ashe County 6 17.8 (12.2, 25.4) 34 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.5, 5.3)
Anson County 6 14.4 (9.1, 21.9) 75 (3, 92) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.2)
Alexander County 6 19.9 (14.8, 26.3) 11 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 6.0)
Alamance County 6 21.8 (19.0, 24.9) 7 (1, 41) 45 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.5, 14.7)
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/13/2024 11:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Jones, Tyrrell, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top