Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County
Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | N/A | 31.7 (31.1, 32.4) | N/A | 2,081 |
rising 
|
1.1 (0.5, 1.8) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) | N/A | 57,211 |
stable 
|
1.5 (-1.1, 3.7) |
| Yancey County 6 | Rural | 45.4 (27.9, 70.1) | 1 (1, 76) | 5 |
|
|
| Union County 6 | Urban | 42.7 (37.9, 47.9) | 2 (1, 17) | 59 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.2, 3.8) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 41.9 (39.6, 44.3) | 3 (1, 11) | 250 |
rising
|
2.2 (1.0, 3.7) |
| Orange County 6 | Urban | 40.6 (34.5, 47.5) | 4 (1, 33) | 34 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.1, 3.6) |
| Guilford County 6 | Urban | 40.3 (37.2, 43.5) | 5 (1, 18) | 135 |
stable
|
1.0 (-9.3, 3.2) |
| McDowell County 6 | Rural | 38.3 (28.6, 50.5) | 6 (1, 61) | 12 |
rising
|
20.1 (6.5, 53.1) |
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 37.7 (24.1, 56.8) | 7 (1, 79) | 6 |
stable
|
3.0 (-2.5, 9.7) |
| Caswell County 6 | Rural | 37.0 (24.2, 55.0) | 8 (1, 78) | 6 |
stable
|
0.5 (-2.7, 4.0) |
| Durham County 6 | Urban | 36.7 (32.8, 40.9) | 9 (2, 34) | 69 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.8, 2.2) |
| Alamance County 6 | Urban | 36.0 (31.0, 41.6) | 10 (1, 43) | 40 |
rising
|
2.6 (0.1, 5.7) |
| Henderson County 6 | Urban | 35.2 (29.4, 42.0) | 11 (1, 51) | 32 |
rising
|
21.3 (1.4, 35.8) |
| Bertie County 6 | Rural | 35.0 (20.8, 56.1) | 12 (1, 79) | 5 |
stable
|
10.6 (-18.5, 48.2) |
| Burke County 6 | Urban | 35.0 (28.4, 42.8) | 13 (1, 55) | 22 |
stable
|
-2.8 (-27.8, 4.0) |
| Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 34.8 (31.5, 38.5) | 14 (5, 39) | 85 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-6.4, 0.7) |
| Gaston County 6 | Urban | 34.7 (30.4, 39.4) | 15 (3, 43) | 51 |
rising
|
2.2 (0.2, 4.5) |
| Wake County 6 | Urban | 34.5 (32.4, 36.6) | 16 (7, 33) | 215 |
rising
|
7.8 (2.9, 11.7) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 34.4 (25.6, 45.3) | 17 (1, 69) | 12 |
stable
|
2.1 (-2.0, 6.6) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 34.2 (30.3, 38.4) | 18 (4, 42) | 59 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.2, 3.8) |
| Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 34.2 (30.3, 38.4) | 19 (4, 43) | 64 |
stable
|
1.9 (-0.5, 4.7) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 33.9 (29.5, 38.8) | 20 (3, 47) | 43 |
stable
|
1.5 (-1.4, 4.9) |
| Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 33.8 (27.5, 41.2) | 21 (2, 60) | 23 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.5, 5.6) |
| Randolph County 6 | Urban | 33.5 (28.4, 39.3) | 22 (3, 52) | 33 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.7, 7.0) |
| Catawba County 6 | Urban | 33.5 (28.6, 39.0) | 23 (3, 52) | 36 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.2, 5.7) |
| Anson County 6 | Urban | 33.1 (21.3, 50.0) | 24 (1, 79) | 5 |
|
|
| Chatham County 6 | Urban | 33.0 (25.9, 41.6) | 25 (1, 66) | 18 |
stable
|
-6.1 (-17.7, 2.4) |
| Harnett County 6 | Rural | 32.8 (27.0, 39.5) | 26 (2, 62) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.7, 2.5) |
| Iredell County 6 | Urban | 32.7 (28.0, 38.0) | 27 (4, 53) | 37 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.3, 3.7) |
| Macon County 6 | Rural | 32.5 (22.4, 45.9) | 28 (1, 77) | 9 |
stable
|
1.9 (-2.6, 7.0) |
| Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 31.9 (22.9, 43.6) | 29 (1, 77) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-4.7, 2.8) |
| Pender County 6 | Urban | 30.8 (23.3, 40.2) | 30 (2, 74) | 12 |
stable
|
1.5 (-1.0, 4.4) |
| Wayne County 6 | Urban | 30.8 (25.1, 37.4) | 31 (5, 67) | 22 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) |
| Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 30.7 (25.5, 36.7) | 32 (6, 66) | 39 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.8, 5.2) |
| Rowan County 6 | Urban | 30.3 (25.2, 36.2) | 33 (6, 64) | 28 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.7, 4.6) |
| Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 29.9 (23.6, 37.5) | 34 (4, 71) | 17 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.7, 2.9) |
| Onslow County 6 | Urban | 29.7 (24.5, 35.7) | 35 (7, 66) | 24 |
stable
|
1.9 (-0.1, 4.3) |
| Bladen County 6 | Rural | 28.8 (19.8, 41.1) | 36 (1, 79) | 7 |
|
|
| Franklin County 6 | Urban | 28.8 (22.0, 37.1) | 37 (6, 76) | 13 |
rising
|
7.7 (0.7, 23.2) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 28.7 (22.7, 35.9) | 38 (6, 74) | 17 |
stable
|
1.3 (-2.0, 5.3) |
| Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 28.1 (19.5, 39.6) | 39 (2, 80) | 8 |
stable
|
0.2 (-5.5, 6.4) |
| New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 27.8 (24.1, 31.9) | 40 (18, 65) | 44 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.1, 2.6) |
| Granville County 6 | Rural | 27.7 (21.0, 36.3) | 41 (6, 78) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-4.5, 2.3) |
| Halifax County 6 | Rural | 27.3 (19.7, 37.1) | 42 (3, 79) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.9, 4.1) |
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 27.0 (16.4, 42.7) | 43 (1, 80) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-6.9, 4.0) |
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 26.8 (20.5, 34.8) | 44 (7, 77) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-6.1, 2.4) |
| Carteret County 6 | Rural | 26.7 (20.4, 34.6) | 45 (8, 77) | 15 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.4, 4.7) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 26.6 (20.0, 35.0) | 46 (7, 78) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-5.4, 4.6) |
| Hertford County 6 | Rural | 26.4 (15.9, 42.2) | 47 (1, 80) | 4 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-7.2, 1.4) |
| Stokes County 6 | Urban | 26.2 (17.8, 37.3) | 48 (3, 80) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-4.6, 4.1) |
| Nash County 6 | Urban | 26.1 (20.6, 32.7) | 49 (13, 77) | 17 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.5, 3.8) |
| Pitt County 6 | Urban | 26.0 (21.5, 31.3) | 50 (19, 74) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.6, 1.1) |
| Ashe County 6 | Rural | 25.7 (16.8, 38.8) | 51 (2, 80) | 6 |
stable
|
3.5 (-2.6, 11.1) |
| Sampson County 6 | Rural | 25.6 (18.7, 34.4) | 52 (7, 80) | 10 |
stable
|
0.8 (-3.6, 5.4) |
| Watauga County 6 | Rural | 25.3 (17.5, 35.7) | 53 (7, 80) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.0, 3.7) |
| Vance County 6 | Rural | 25.2 (16.9, 36.1) | 54 (4, 80) | 7 |
rising
|
3.4 (0.3, 7.0) |
| Duplin County 6 | Rural | 25.2 (17.9, 34.6) | 55 (7, 80) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.8, 3.3) |
| Columbus County 6 | Rural | 25.1 (18.0, 34.3) | 56 (8, 80) | 9 |
stable
|
1.0 (-2.9, 5.1) |
| Davie County 6 | Urban | 24.7 (17.2, 34.7) | 57 (6, 80) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-5.5, 3.6) |
| Craven County 6 | Rural | 24.4 (19.1, 30.9) | 58 (20, 79) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.3, 2.4) |
| Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 23.5 (16.4, 32.9) | 59 (11, 80) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-3.7, 2.6) |
| Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 23.3 (16.9, 31.5) | 60 (15, 80) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-4.9, 3.9) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 23.0 (19.1, 27.4) | 61 (34, 78) | 27 |
falling 
|
-13.5 (-33.0, -0.5) |
| Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 22.9 (13.0, 43.5) | 62 (2, 80) | 3 |
|
|
| Johnston County 6 | Urban | 22.8 (19.1, 26.9) | 63 (36, 78) | 28 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-4.0, 0.7) |
| Stanly County 6 | Rural | 22.7 (16.1, 31.0) | 64 (15, 80) | 9 |
stable
|
0.4 (-3.7, 4.8) |
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 22.4 (11.6, 40.5) | 65 (1, 80) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-8.3, 4.7) |
| Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 22.2 (14.6, 33.2) | 66 (10, 80) | 7 |
stable
|
0.0 (-3.4, 3.5) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 22.0 (13.7, 33.4) | 67 (8, 80) | 5 |
|
|
| Surry County 6 | Rural | 21.6 (16.0, 28.8) | 68 (27, 80) | 11 |
falling
|
-10.2 (-38.7, -1.3) |
| Northampton County 6 | Rural | 21.3 (11.3, 38.3) | 69 (3, 80) | 4 |
|
|
| Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 21.3 (15.4, 28.9) | 70 (26, 80) | 10 |
falling
|
-5.9 (-39.0, -1.8) |
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (11.0, 37.9) | 71 (4, 80) | 3 |
stable
|
1.1 (-3.7, 6.4) |
| Alexander County 6 | Urban | 21.0 (13.9, 31.0) | 72 (17, 80) | 6 |
stable
|
3.7 (-1.1, 10.0) |
| Moore County 6 | Urban | 20.6 (15.9, 26.5) | 73 (34, 80) | 15 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-5.1, 1.3) |
| Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 20.6 (15.8, 26.4) | 74 (38, 80) | 14 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.9, 5.6) |
| Person County 6 | Urban | 20.5 (13.9, 29.8) | 75 (20, 80) | 7 |
stable
|
0.4 (-2.8, 4.0) |
| Robeson County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.8, 25.8) | 76 (38, 80) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.1, 2.0) |
| Hoke County 6 | Urban | 19.1 (12.4, 28.2) | 77 (26, 80) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-6.1, 3.6) |
| Wilson County 6 | Rural | 18.3 (13.5, 24.5) | 78 (42, 80) | 10 |
falling
|
-5.5 (-10.7, -2.7) |
| Dare County 6 | Rural | 18.0 (11.3, 27.8) | 79 (29, 80) | 5 |
falling
|
-26.4 (-56.1, -2.8) |
| Lee County 6 | Rural | 16.8 (11.3, 24.1) | 80 (46, 80) | 7 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-7.3, -0.9) |
| Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Avery County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cherokee County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Chowan County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clay County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currituck County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greene County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jones County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitchell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Montgomery County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perquimans County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Richmond County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Scotland County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Swain County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 10:11 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Avery, Camden, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hyde, Jones, Mitchell, Montgomery, Perquimans, Richmond, Scotland, Swain, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 10:11 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Avery, Camden, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hyde, Jones, Mitchell, Montgomery, Perquimans, Richmond, Scotland, Swain, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.