Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 29.8 (29.2, 30.5) N/A 1,932 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 29.4 (29.3, 29.5) N/A 57,125 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Yancey County 6 24.7 (14.3, 41.3) 55 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Yadkin County 6 19.4 (12.8, 28.8) 71 (23, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.8, 5.2)
Wilson County 6 14.1 (10.0, 19.4) 79 (59, 80) 8 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.3, -2.2)
Wilkes County 6 18.8 (13.4, 25.8) 72 (31, 80) 10 stable stable trend 12.8 (-14.3, 48.5)
Wayne County 6 28.1 (22.9, 34.2) 34 (8, 68) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Watauga County 6 19.8 (13.1, 29.0) 70 (18, 80) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.7, 2.2)
Warren County 6 31.5 (18.9, 50.2) 20 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 6.8)
Wake County 6 31.5 (29.5, 33.6) 19 (12, 38) 187 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Vance County 6 26.8 (18.9, 37.0) 42 (3, 78) 8 stable stable trend -17.7 (-32.7, 0.6)
Union County 6 38.4 (33.8, 43.5) 3 (1, 26) 52 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Transylvania County 6 26.9 (18.1, 39.3) 41 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.8)
Surry County 6 25.0 (19.0, 32.6) 52 (9, 76) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 3.9)
Stokes County 6 24.9 (17.2, 35.1) 53 (3, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.5)
Stanly County 6 21.1 (15.4, 28.5) 66 (20, 80) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Sampson County 6 22.3 (16.1, 30.3) 62 (12, 80) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 2.9)
Rutherford County 6 21.5 (16.0, 28.5) 65 (22, 79) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 1.8)
Rowan County 6 34.2 (28.8, 40.3) 15 (1, 49) 31 stable stable trend -9.3 (-18.6, 0.9)
Rockingham County 6 33.4 (27.3, 40.6) 16 (1, 55) 23 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.5)
Robeson County 6 15.7 (11.9, 20.3) 78 (57, 80) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.1)
Randolph County 6 36.9 (31.6, 42.9) 7 (1, 35) 37 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.4, 6.9)
Polk County 6 13.6 (7.8, 25.1) 80 (46, 80) 3 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.7, 0.8)
Pitt County 6 25.2 (20.9, 30.3) 49 (17, 72) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Person County 6 21.5 (14.4, 31.3) 64 (11, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.8)
Pender County 6 29.2 (21.9, 38.3) 31 (2, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Pasquotank County 6 36.6 (26.6, 49.3) 8 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Orange County 6 36.3 (30.5, 42.8) 9 (1, 43) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Onslow County 6 29.6 (24.3, 35.7) 29 (4, 64) 23 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.4)
New Hanover County 6 26.5 (22.8, 30.7) 44 (18, 66) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Nash County 6 25.9 (20.5, 32.5) 48 (12, 75) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2)
Moore County 6 21.0 (16.3, 26.7) 67 (30, 79) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
Mecklenburg County 6 39.0 (36.7, 41.4) 2 (1, 15) 229 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
McDowell County 6 25.2 (17.9, 35.0) 50 (5, 79) 8 rising rising trend 28.8 (7.1, 54.7)
Martin County 6 29.9 (19.2, 45.2) 27 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 4.1)
Madison County 6 26.0 (14.7, 43.0) 47 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.3, 8.2)
Macon County 6 32.8 (22.9, 46.0) 18 (1, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.2, 6.9)
Lincoln County 6 30.5 (24.3, 37.9) 25 (2, 66) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.6)
Lenoir County 6 22.9 (16.4, 31.2) 60 (13, 80) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.3)
Lee County 6 17.3 (11.4, 25.1) 77 (31, 80) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.8, -0.1)
Johnston County 6 21.8 (18.1, 26.1) 63 (34, 77) 25 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.3)
Jackson County 6 18.7 (10.9, 29.8) 73 (11, 80) 4
*
*
Iredell County 6 27.8 (23.5, 32.8) 35 (11, 66) 30 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Hoke County 6 20.1 (13.1, 29.5) 69 (14, 80) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.0, 2.3)
Hertford County 6 18.2 (9.6, 31.8) 75 (7, 80) 3 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.3, -0.4)
Henderson County 6 23.1 (18.6, 28.6) 58 (23, 76) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Haywood County 6 20.9 (15.3, 28.2) 68 (22, 80) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.3, 0.3)
Harnett County 6 24.6 (19.7, 30.5) 57 (16, 76) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.3)
Halifax County 6 18.7 (13.0, 26.4) 74 (30, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.1, 3.0)
Guilford County 6 37.4 (34.5, 40.6) 4 (1, 21) 124 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.6)
Granville County 6 26.4 (19.6, 34.9) 45 (4, 77) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.2)
Gaston County 6 31.5 (27.4, 36.0) 21 (5, 51) 45 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 3.9)
Franklin County 6 28.4 (21.6, 36.7) 33 (3, 74) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Forsyth County 6 35.2 (31.9, 38.9) 12 (2, 30) 85 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 1.9)
Edgecombe County 6 29.6 (21.9, 39.4) 28 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.1)
Durham County 6 28.4 (25.0, 32.3) 32 (13, 59) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Duplin County 6 17.5 (12.0, 24.9) 76 (35, 80) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.0)
Davie County 6 26.7 (18.8, 37.2) 43 (2, 79) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.0)
Davidson County 6 27.1 (22.8, 32.0) 40 (15, 68) 30 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.7)
Dare County 6 29.3 (20.3, 41.5) 30 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.2)
Currituck County 6 24.6 (14.5, 39.5) 56 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.6, 3.0)
Cumberland County 6 30.4 (26.7, 34.4) 26 (8, 53) 52 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.2)
Craven County 6 26.2 (20.7, 32.9) 46 (9, 74) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Columbus County 6 27.3 (20.2, 36.4) 39 (3, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.8)
Cleveland County 6 22.9 (17.7, 29.3) 59 (20, 78) 15 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.0)
Chowan County 6 27.8 (15.1, 48.6) 36 (1, 80) 3 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.6, 3.4)
Chatham County 6 37.3 (29.7, 46.4) 6 (1, 49) 20 stable stable trend -8.0 (-19.2, 4.7)
Catawba County 6 35.3 (30.1, 41.1) 11 (1, 46) 36 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.5, 5.2)
Caswell County 6 35.5 (23.1, 53.1) 10 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.1)
Carteret County 6 27.5 (20.8, 35.9) 37 (3, 74) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.6)
Caldwell County 6 30.7 (24.3, 38.4) 24 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Cabarrus County 6 30.8 (26.4, 35.6) 23 (5, 54) 37 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Burke County 6 34.3 (27.8, 42.1) 14 (1, 53) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.5)
Buncombe County 6 35.1 (31.1, 39.5) 13 (1, 39) 63 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.4)
Brunswick County 6 27.4 (22.4, 33.2) 38 (11, 69) 33 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.4)
Bladen County 6 22.6 (15.3, 32.8) 61 (10, 80) 7
*
*
Bertie County 6 37.4 (23.4, 57.7) 5 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.4, 4.9)
Beaufort County 6 25.1 (18.0, 34.3) 51 (6, 79) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Ashe County 6 24.9 (15.7, 38.3) 54 (2, 80) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.6, 9.6)
Anson County 6 30.8 (19.9, 46.3) 22 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Alexander County 6 33.1 (23.2, 46.1) 17 (1, 73) 8 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.2, 10.5)
Alamance County 6 40.8 (35.5, 46.9) 1 (1, 21) 44 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.3, 6.5)
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/29/2023 4:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Avery, Camden, Cherokee, Clay, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hyde, Jones, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Perquimans, Richmond, Scotland, Swain, Tyrrell, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top