Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Childhood (Ages <20, All Sites) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 17.9 (17.2, 18.7) N/A 466 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.8 (18.6, 18.9) N/A 14,940 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Catawba County 6 13.1 (8.6, 19.3) 42 (13, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.4)
Orange County 6 13.3 (8.4, 20.0) 41 (12, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.2, 5.5)
Pitt County 6 13.7 (9.3, 19.3) 40 (15, 42) 6 falling falling trend -14.3 (-30.4, -3.5)
Cumberland County 6 13.9 (10.7, 17.8) 39 (20, 42) 13 falling falling trend -4.3 (-21.9, -0.5)
Robeson County 6 14.5 (9.5, 21.1) 38 (9, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.2, 5.9)
Wayne County 6 14.6 (9.3, 21.7) 37 (8, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.8, 7.9)
Onslow County 6 15.8 (11.5, 21.2) 36 (10, 42) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.6)
Forsyth County 6 15.8 (12.5, 19.7) 35 (13, 42) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 4.0)
Rowan County 6 16.6 (11.1, 23.8) 34 (5, 42) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.4)
Mecklenburg County 6 17.1 (15.0, 19.4) 33 (15, 38) 49 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.1)
Burke County 6 17.1 (9.8, 27.9) 32 (2, 42) 3 stable stable trend -10.6 (-42.5, 0.2)
Union County 6 17.6 (13.4, 22.7) 31 (7, 41) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 3.0)
Guilford County 6 17.8 (14.8, 21.2) 30 (10, 39) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Harnett County 6 17.8 (12.4, 24.8) 29 (5, 42) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 5.5)
Craven County 6 17.9 (11.2, 27.0) 28 (3, 42) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 6.1)
Wake County 6 18.0 (15.8, 20.3) 27 (12, 36) 52 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Davidson County 6 18.6 (13.1, 25.6) 26 (3, 42) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.3)
Alamance County 6 18.6 (13.3, 25.4) 25 (4, 41) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.5)
Lincoln County 6 18.8 (11.1, 29.7) 24 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Cabarrus County 6 19.1 (14.4, 24.8) 23 (4, 41) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.2, 7.0)
New Hanover County 6 19.2 (14.2, 25.5) 22 (4, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.6)
Rockingham County 6 19.6 (12.0, 30.3) 21 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.9, 9.1)
Caldwell County 6 19.8 (11.7, 31.3) 20 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.4, 5.5)
Gaston County 6 20.0 (15.1, 26.1) 19 (3, 40) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 5.2)
Durham County 6 20.3 (16.1, 25.3) 18 (4, 37) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 5.2)
Franklin County 6 20.4 (11.9, 32.7) 17 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Duplin County 6 20.6 (11.8, 33.5) 16 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Iredell County 6 20.7 (15.2, 27.6) 15 (2, 40) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.5, 5.7)
Randolph County 6 21.0 (14.8, 29.0) 14 (2, 41) 7
*
*
Brunswick County 6 21.1 (13.5, 31.4) 13 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.6, 7.4)
Sampson County 6 21.2 (12.6, 33.5) 12 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.2, 7.8)
Rutherford County 6 21.3 (12.2, 34.6) 11 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Cleveland County 6 21.5 (14.1, 31.6) 10 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (0.0, 8.1)
Chatham County 6 21.6 (12.6, 34.7) 9 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Henderson County 6 21.8 (14.2, 32.0) 8 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.4, 6.7)
Surry County 6 22.5 (13.5, 35.2) 7 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (-2.6, 12.9)
Pender County 6 23.9 (14.1, 37.8) 6 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.8, 11.3)
Buncombe County 6 24.2 (18.7, 30.9) 5 (1, 31) 13 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 7.3)
Stanly County 6 26.9 (16.4, 41.6) 4 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Moore County 6 27.8 (19.0, 39.3) 3 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.3, 11.0)
Johnston County 6 27.9 (22.0, 34.8) 2 (1, 21) 15 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.0, 8.7)
Scotland County 6 37.6 (21.9, 60.2) 1 (1, 36) 3
*
*
Alexander County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lenoir County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nash County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Columbus, Currituck, Dare, Davie, Edgecombe, Gates, Graham, Granville, Greene, Halifax, Haywood, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Lee, Lenoir, Macon, Madison, Martin, McDowell, Mitchell, Montgomery, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Person, Polk, Richmond, Stokes, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Wilkes, Wilson, Yadkin, Yancey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top