Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6,10 Yes 37.7 (37.1, 38.2) 4,081 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.8 (39.7, 39.9) 139,083 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Swain County 6,10 No 60.9 (45.2, 80.5) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-26.3, 44.3)
Warren County 6,10 No 54.9 (42.9, 69.6) 16 stable stable trend 2.8 (-16.5, 26.5)
Washington County 6,10 No 54.5 (40.1, 73.2) 10 stable stable trend -3.6 (-44.7, 68.0)
Vance County 6,10 No 50.9 (42.5, 60.6) 27 stable stable trend -11.2 (-22.5, 1.8)
Granville County 6,10 No 50.3 (42.9, 58.6) 34 stable stable trend -4.6 (-19.1, 12.5)
McDowell County 6,10 No 49.3 (41.3, 58.5) 28 stable stable trend -7.7 (-28.0, 18.2)
Scotland County 6,10 No 48.5 (39.2, 59.5) 20 stable stable trend 9.1 (-12.2, 35.5)
Pasquotank County 6,10 No 47.8 (39.0, 58.0) 22 falling falling trend -13.2 (-23.5, -1.5)
Bladen County 6,10 No 47.5 (38.9, 57.5) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-22.8, 27.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 No 47.3 (37.5, 58.9) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-42.6, 66.8)
Anson County 6,10 No 47.0 (36.9, 59.3) 15 stable stable trend 9.0 (-17.1, 43.4)
Burke County 6,10 No 47.0 (41.5, 53.1) 55 stable stable trend -5.4 (-17.2, 8.0)
Macon County 6,10 No 46.6 (38.2, 56.6) 26 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.3, 10.4)
Martin County 6,10 No 46.5 (36.6, 58.5) 16 rising rising trend 10.1 (1.4, 19.6)
Cleveland County 6,10 No 46.2 (40.8, 52.1) 56 stable stable trend -5.6 (-21.2, 13.2)
Beaufort County 6,10 No 45.6 (38.4, 53.9) 31 stable stable trend -6.8 (-19.6, 8.2)
Wayne County 6,10 No 45.3 (40.2, 50.7) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-12.8, 15.7)
Lee County 6,10 No 45.0 (38.0, 53.0) 30 stable stable trend -4.4 (-18.5, 12.1)
Gaston County 6,10 No 44.8 (41.0, 48.8) 107 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.0, 2.2)
Mitchell County 6,10 No 44.6 (32.9, 59.8) 11 stable stable trend 10.6 (-26.6, 66.8)
Caswell County 6,10 No 44.6 (34.5, 57.0) 14 stable stable trend -13.7 (-38.4, 20.8)
Jackson County 6,10 No 44.2 (35.5, 54.4) 20 stable stable trend -12.9 (-36.3, 18.9)
Halifax County 6,10 No 44.1 (37.3, 51.9) 31 stable stable trend -3.5 (-14.9, 9.5)
Rockingham County 6,10 No 43.8 (38.7, 49.5) 56 stable stable trend -6.3 (-26.8, 19.9)
Davidson County 6,10 No 43.0 (39.0, 47.4) 87 stable stable trend -2.4 (-12.5, 8.9)
Caldwell County 6,10 No 42.7 (37.2, 48.9) 45 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.1, 21.1)
Richmond County 6,10 No 42.3 (34.9, 50.9) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-11.4, 14.5)
Lenoir County 6,10 No 42.2 (35.8, 49.5) 32 stable stable trend -4.6 (-25.0, 21.3)
Rowan County 6,10 No 42.2 (37.8, 46.9) 71 stable stable trend -6.9 (-19.0, 7.0)
Jones County 6,10 No 42.0 (27.6, 62.1) 6 stable stable trend -9.6 (-24.8, 8.7)
Person County 6,10 No 41.8 (33.9, 51.1) 20 falling falling trend -11.5 (-19.9, -2.2)
Alexander County 6,10 No 41.7 (33.7, 51.2) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-23.7, 26.5)
Northampton County 6,10 No 41.7 (31.9, 53.9) 14 stable stable trend -3.7 (-20.9, 17.2)
Catawba County 6,10 No 41.6 (37.5, 46.1) 77 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.9, 12.8)
Randolph County 6,10 No 41.6 (37.3, 46.3) 70 stable stable trend 3.9 (-5.4, 14.2)
Iredell County 6,10 No 41.5 (37.3, 46.0) 76 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.9, 4.1)
Carteret County 6,10 No 41.5 (35.9, 47.8) 42 stable stable trend -2.1 (-18.4, 17.4)
Madison County 6,10 No 41.2 (31.5, 53.4) 13 stable stable trend -10.0 (-36.0, 26.4)
Henderson County 6,10 No 41.1 (36.8, 45.9) 72 stable stable trend -6.9 (-17.0, 4.4)
Chowan County 6,10 No 41.1 (29.5, 56.2) 9 stable stable trend -5.7 (-11.8, 1.0)
Stanly County 6,10 No 41.1 (34.9, 48.1) 32 stable stable trend -7.5 (-22.4, 10.2)
Davie County 6,10 No 40.8 (33.5, 49.4) 23 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.1, 3.9)
Ashe County 6,10 No 40.6 (31.9, 51.3) 17 stable stable trend 11.6 (-9.9, 38.2)
Rutherford County 6,10 No 40.6 (34.9, 47.2) 37 stable stable trend 4.6 (-14.6, 28.1)
Hertford County 6,10 No 40.6 (31.2, 52.2) 13 rising rising trend 10.3 (2.2, 19.0)
Franklin County 6,10 No 40.5 (34.0, 48.0) 28 stable stable trend -0.0 (-6.6, 7.0)
Onslow County 6,10 No 40.4 (35.4, 45.8) 50 stable stable trend -3.4 (-11.9, 6.0)
Stokes County 6,10 Yes 39.7 (32.9, 47.6) 25 stable stable trend 2.5 (-17.9, 28.1)
Wilkes County 6,10 Yes 39.6 (34.1, 45.9) 38 stable stable trend 2.9 (-5.3, 11.8)
Alleghany County 6,10 Yes 39.6 (27.2, 56.8) 7 stable stable trend -14.2 (-46.5, 37.7)
Nash County 6,10 Yes 39.0 (34.0, 44.5) 46 stable stable trend -8.1 (-22.5, 9.0)
Avery County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (28.5, 52.4) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-19.1, 19.9)
Harnett County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (33.7, 44.6) 43 stable stable trend -2.7 (-13.9, 10.0)
Pamlico County 6,10 Yes 38.8 (26.8, 55.1) 8 stable stable trend 43.6 (-10.0, 129.2)
Perquimans County 6,10 Yes 38.5 (26.7, 54.4) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-24.6, 36.4)
Surry County 6,10 Yes 38.3 (32.9, 44.5) 37 stable stable trend 5.3 (-6.1, 18.0)
Robeson County 6,10 Yes 38.2 (33.6, 43.3) 53 stable stable trend 2.7 (-13.2, 21.6)
Forsyth County 6,10 Yes 37.5 (34.8, 40.3) 149 stable stable trend -0.7 (-13.4, 13.7)
Cabarrus County 6,10 Yes 37.3 (33.4, 41.5) 70 stable stable trend -8.8 (-17.5, 0.7)
Graham County 6,10 Yes 37.1 (21.8, 59.5) 4 stable stable trend 17.7 (-41.7, 137.6)
Columbus County 6,10 Yes 36.7 (30.5, 43.8) 26 stable stable trend -8.6 (-25.5, 12.1)
Edgecombe County 6,10 Yes 36.3 (30.0, 43.5) 25 stable stable trend 7.9 (-25.1, 55.5)
Duplin County 6,10 Yes 36.2 (30.0, 43.2) 25 stable stable trend -6.9 (-32.0, 27.4)
Gates County 6,10 Yes 35.9 (23.4, 53.3) 5 stable stable trend 21.3 (-2.1, 50.3)
Transylvania County 6,10 Yes 35.9 (28.5, 44.8) 20 stable stable trend 1.5 (-17.1, 24.2)
Dare County 6,10 Yes 35.7 (27.9, 45.1) 16 falling falling trend -13.3 (-18.4, -7.9)
Cumberland County 6,10 Yes 35.4 (32.3, 38.7) 100 stable stable trend -7.5 (-15.0, 0.6)
Clay County 6,10 Yes 35.4 (23.5, 52.5) 6 stable stable trend 16.4 (-37.0, 115.0)
Union County 6,10 Yes 35.3 (31.5, 39.4) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-21.6, 24.4)
Guilford County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (33.0, 37.6) 191 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.4, 5.3)
Moore County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (30.8, 40.2) 51 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.8, 7.9)
Alamance County 6,10 Yes 35.1 (31.3, 39.2) 64 stable stable trend -1.1 (-10.6, 9.4)
Johnston County 6,10 Yes 35.1 (31.0, 39.5) 59 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.3, 6.4)
Bertie County 6,10 Yes 35.1 (25.7, 47.0) 10 stable stable trend -7.7 (-30.3, 22.3)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 Yes 34.7 (32.9, 36.5) 293 stable stable trend 0.5 (-6.2, 7.7)
Durham County 6,10 Yes 34.4 (31.2, 37.8) 89 stable stable trend -6.9 (-18.9, 6.7)
Yadkin County 6,10 Yes 34.4 (27.4, 42.7) 17 stable stable trend 6.6 (-11.8, 28.9)
Pender County 6,10 Yes 34.3 (28.2, 41.5) 23 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.5, 10.3)
Craven County 6,10 Yes 34.1 (29.6, 39.3) 42 stable stable trend 1.1 (-7.5, 10.5)
Wake County 6,10 Yes 33.8 (32.0, 35.7) 282 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.4, 5.3)
Brunswick County 6,10 Yes 33.7 (29.7, 38.3) 59 stable stable trend 2.3 (-5.1, 10.3)
Haywood County 6,10 Yes 33.5 (28.2, 39.6) 31 stable stable trend 3.2 (-6.3, 13.7)
Pitt County 6,10 Yes 33.5 (29.4, 37.9) 52 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 6.4)
Wilson County 6,10 Yes 33.2 (28.3, 38.9) 33 stable stable trend -8.5 (-24.5, 10.9)
Orange County 6,10 Yes 33.1 (28.7, 38.1) 42 stable stable trend -6.0 (-15.9, 5.2)
Currituck County 6,10 Yes 32.7 (23.3, 44.8) 8 stable stable trend -10.7 (-45.5, 46.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 Yes 32.6 (27.5, 38.6) 30 stable stable trend -11.1 (-22.1, 1.5)
Sampson County 6,10 Yes 32.6 (27.1, 39.0) 25 stable stable trend -3.2 (-10.4, 4.7)
Cherokee County 6,10 Yes 32.3 (25.0, 41.4) 15 stable stable trend -3.0 (-27.3, 29.5)
Buncombe County 6,10 Yes 32.0 (29.2, 35.1) 100 stable stable trend -2.1 (-11.1, 7.7)
Hoke County 6,10 Yes 31.8 (24.0, 41.2) 12 stable stable trend 13.8 (-13.6, 49.9)
Chatham County 6,10 Yes 31.2 (26.1, 37.2) 29 falling falling trend -14.6 (-20.7, -8.1)
Greene County 6,10 Yes 31.2 (21.7, 43.5) 7 falling falling trend -14.7 (-21.1, -7.8)
New Hanover County 6,10 Yes 29.6 (26.5, 32.9) 71 stable stable trend -6.0 (-13.2, 1.8)
Polk County 6,10 Yes 28.4 (20.4, 39.2) 10 stable stable trend -16.8 (-40.2, 15.7)
Yancey County 6,10 Yes 28.4 (20.1, 39.5) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-27.2, 40.1)
Watauga County 6,10 Yes 26.0 (20.0, 33.3) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-28.1, 41.9)
Camden County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2017 2:36 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top