Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 *** 70.0 (69.2, 70.7) 7,704 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 61.2 (61.1, 61.3) 215,604 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 *** 58.0 (55.6, 60.5) 461 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.5, 0.0)
Wake County 6,10 *** 56.0 (53.6, 58.6) 427 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Guilford County 6,10 *** 67.4 (64.2, 70.6) 360 stable stable trend -5.4 (-13.3, 3.2)
Forsyth County 6,10 *** 71.4 (67.7, 75.3) 286 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.5, 4.6)
Gaston County 6,10 *** 87.4 (82.2, 92.9) 215 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 4.1)
Buncombe County 6,10 *** 66.1 (62.2, 70.3) 215 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.1)
Cumberland County 6,10 *** 72.5 (68.0, 77.1) 205 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.3, 9.4)
Davidson County 6,10 *** 81.7 (76.2, 87.5) 170 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.2)
New Hanover County 6,10 *** 64.1 (59.6, 68.8) 158 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.9, 7.4)
Rowan County 6,10 *** 86.9 (80.7, 93.5) 148 stable stable trend 3.1 (-3.9, 10.7)
Randolph County 6,10 *** 83.6 (77.6, 90.1) 146 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.6, 3.3)
Durham County 6,10 *** 58.2 (53.9, 62.7) 145 stable stable trend -6.0 (-20.7, 11.4)
Cabarrus County 6,10 *** 74.3 (68.7, 80.3) 135 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.2, 3.6)
Catawba County 6,10 *** 70.5 (65.2, 76.2) 133 stable stable trend 1.4 (-11.1, 15.6)
Brunswick County 6,10 *** 67.7 (62.3, 73.5) 132 stable stable trend -2.9 (-12.0, 7.2)
Johnston County 6,10 *** 76.1 (70.2, 82.4) 131 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.9, 7.2)
Iredell County 6,10 *** 70.6 (65.2, 76.3) 130 stable stable trend -6.3 (-15.3, 3.8)
Alamance County 6,10 *** 68.2 (63.0, 73.8) 128 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.4, 8.1)
Union County 6,10 *** 61.0 (56.0, 66.4) 116 stable stable trend -6.3 (-19.9, 9.7)
Henderson County 6,10 *** 60.0 (55.0, 65.4) 111 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.7)
Rockingham County 6,10 *** 85.6 (78.5, 93.2) 111 stable stable trend 0.4 (-12.6, 15.3)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 78.0 (71.5, 84.8) 111 stable stable trend 6.5 (-2.2, 16.0)
Moore County 6,10 *** 72.3 (66.1, 79.0) 108 stable stable trend -0.6 (-13.2, 14.0)
Onslow County 6,10 *** 88.3 (80.9, 96.2) 108 stable stable trend 1.2 (-12.2, 16.6)
Craven County 6,10 *** 82.3 (75.4, 89.7) 107 stable stable trend -3.4 (-17.3, 12.9)
Robeson County 6,10 *** 73.3 (66.9, 80.1) 102 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.4, 5.6)
Burke County 6,10 *** 81.3 (74.2, 88.9) 99 stable stable trend -0.7 (-15.8, 17.2)
Pitt County 6,10 *** 64.1 (58.5, 70.1) 99 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.7)
Caldwell County 6,10 *** 84.7 (77.0, 93.0) 93 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.8, 6.5)
Harnett County 6,10 *** 83.3 (75.7, 91.4) 92 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.5, 11.3)
Nash County 6,10 *** 74.7 (67.7, 82.2) 87 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.0, 11.3)
Cleveland County 6,10 *** 68.7 (62.3, 75.6) 87 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.4, -0.1)
Surry County 6,10 *** 79.9 (72.2, 88.2) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-10.8, 13.2)
Wilkes County 6,10 *** 77.2 (69.5, 85.5) 77 stable stable trend 3.6 (-11.0, 20.7)
Rutherford County 6,10 *** 78.1 (70.3, 86.6) 76 stable stable trend -2.5 (-12.3, 8.4)
Carteret County 6,10 *** 72.0 (64.6, 80.1) 74 stable stable trend -9.5 (-19.0, 1.2)
Wilson County 6,10 *** 71.7 (64.4, 79.6) 72 stable stable trend -4.9 (-16.0, 7.7)
Haywood County 6,10 *** 71.0 (63.5, 79.2) 69 stable stable trend 1.2 (-18.1, 24.9)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 72.9 (65.2, 81.3) 69 stable stable trend 2.3 (-6.3, 11.6)
Orange County 6,10 *** 56.5 (50.4, 63.0) 69 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.6, 5.8)
Stanly County 6,10 *** 78.9 (70.3, 88.3) 63 stable stable trend -4.9 (-24.6, 19.9)
Columbus County 6,10 *** 82.0 (73.0, 92.0) 62 stable stable trend -5.3 (-13.2, 3.3)
Sampson County 6,10 *** 76.2 (67.7, 85.5) 60 stable stable trend -2.7 (-16.0, 12.6)
Stokes County 6,10 *** 87.2 (77.3, 98.2) 58 stable stable trend 2.1 (-6.1, 11.0)
Beaufort County 6,10 *** 81.0 (71.5, 91.5) 57 stable stable trend -4.2 (-12.1, 4.3)
Lenoir County 6,10 *** 72.5 (64.2, 81.6) 57 stable stable trend 5.5 (-17.5, 34.9)
Granville County 6,10 *** 81.1 (71.7, 91.4) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.5, 7.9)
Chatham County 6,10 *** 53.6 (47.3, 60.5) 56 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.6, 3.8)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 74.8 (66.0, 84.6) 54 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.8, 6.4)
McDowell County 6,10 *** 86.9 (76.7, 98.2) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-12.8, 15.2)
Halifax County 6,10 *** 69.6 (61.4, 78.7) 53 stable stable trend 4.0 (-4.7, 13.5)
Davie County 6,10 *** 88.2 (77.6, 99.9) 52 stable stable trend 3.4 (-7.9, 16.1)
Pender County 6,10 *** 71.8 (63.1, 81.4) 51 stable stable trend -5.3 (-19.6, 11.6)
Lee County 6,10 *** 73.4 (64.5, 83.2) 50 stable stable trend -2.5 (-12.8, 8.9)
Richmond County 6,10 *** 85.6 (75.1, 97.2) 50 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.1, -2.5)
Duplin County 6,10 *** 66.9 (58.7, 76.1) 49 stable stable trend 7.5 (-7.9, 25.4)
Edgecombe County 6,10 *** 64.5 (56.4, 73.6) 47 stable stable trend 4.4 (-6.4, 16.5)
Macon County 6,10 *** 72.6 (63.2, 83.3) 45 stable stable trend -4.8 (-10.9, 1.8)
Vance County 6,10 *** 77.3 (67.2, 88.6) 43 stable stable trend 4.6 (-14.7, 28.3)
Yadkin County 6,10 *** 81.3 (70.6, 93.3) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-23.0, 31.6)
Person County 6,10 *** 83.0 (72.0, 95.4) 42 stable stable trend -1.2 (-14.0, 13.4)
Cherokee County 6,10 *** 80.8 (69.6, 93.8) 40 stable stable trend -5.1 (-27.0, 23.4)
Scotland County 6,10 *** 89.2 (76.8, 103.2) 38 stable stable trend 13.8 (-0.2, 29.7)
Transylvania County 6,10 *** 56.9 (48.6, 66.7) 35 stable stable trend 9.6 (-10.0, 33.5)
Alexander County 6,10 *** 71.2 (60.8, 83.0) 35 stable stable trend -10.4 (-23.1, 4.4)
Hoke County 6,10 *** 95.2 (80.9, 111.3) 35 stable stable trend -10.7 (-29.3, 12.8)
Pasquotank County 6,10 *** 73.3 (62.6, 85.4) 34 stable stable trend -6.0 (-19.3, 9.5)
Bladen County 6,10 *** 69.2 (58.8, 81.1) 33 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.5, 16.9)
Dare County 6,10 *** 68.7 (58.3, 80.5) 33 stable stable trend 6.2 (-9.4, 24.6)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 60.8 (51.5, 71.5) 32 stable stable trend -14.9 (-36.0, 13.3)
Watauga County 6,10 *** 53.3 (44.7, 63.1) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-24.0, 29.7)
Ashe County 6,10 *** 63.9 (53.5, 76.1) 28 stable stable trend 1.7 (-14.9, 21.5)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 74.5 (62.5, 88.4) 28 stable stable trend -5.4 (-18.4, 9.7)
Martin County 6,10 *** 72.7 (60.5, 87.0) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-20.9, 24.7)
Yancey County 6,10 *** 90.1 (74.9, 108.0) 26 stable stable trend -4.4 (-41.0, 54.8)
Anson County 6,10 *** 77.7 (64.6, 92.9) 26 stable stable trend 7.3 (-6.4, 22.9)
Northampton County 6,10 *** 71.9 (59.3, 86.8) 24 stable stable trend -4.6 (-24.1, 19.9)
Warren County 6,10 *** 72.5 (59.6, 87.8) 23 stable stable trend -13.4 (-30.7, 8.2)
Currituck County 6,10 *** 77.2 (63.1, 93.6) 23 falling falling trend -7.0 (-12.8, -0.8)
Caswell County 6,10 *** 66.5 (54.5, 80.8) 22 stable stable trend -8.4 (-32.6, 24.4)
Pamlico County 6,10 *** 93.4 (75.9, 114.6) 21 stable stable trend 14.0 (-14.7, 52.4)
Mitchell County 6,10 *** 81.9 (66.7, 100.3) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-20.2, 26.4)
Greene County 6,10 *** 82.3 (66.7, 100.5) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-30.6, 50.1)
Bertie County 6,10 *** 64.9 (52.5, 79.7) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-24.6, 34.9)
Hertford County 6,10 *** 58.5 (47.3, 71.9) 19 stable stable trend -9.6 (-19.5, 1.5)
Polk County 6,10 *** 48.6 (38.9, 60.8) 19 stable stable trend -11.8 (-43.4, 37.5)
Madison County 6,10 *** 58.2 (46.7, 72.0) 18 stable stable trend 4.4 (-23.8, 43.2)
Swain County 6,10 *** 86.1 (68.7, 107.0) 17 stable stable trend -10.1 (-25.5, 8.4)
Avery County 6,10 *** 62.4 (49.4, 78.4) 16 stable stable trend 9.3 (-1.9, 21.7)
Chowan County 6,10 *** 65.6 (51.0, 83.6) 15 stable stable trend -13.1 (-26.5, 2.7)
Alleghany County 6,10 *** 73.8 (57.2, 94.8) 14 stable stable trend 9.4 (-14.9, 40.7)
Perquimans County 6,10 *** 60.1 (46.4, 77.5) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-15.2, 21.5)
Jones County 6,10 *** 80.0 (61.4, 103.5) 13 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.8, 14.1)
Washington County 6,10 *** 67.2 (51.4, 87.1) 13 stable stable trend 8.1 (-19.6, 45.3)
Clay County 6,10 *** 58.3 (44.0, 77.4) 12 stable stable trend -21.6 (-47.8, 17.8)
Graham County 6,10 *** 67.8 (49.2, 92.2) 9 rising rising trend 38.9 (11.1, 73.6)
Gates County 6,10 *** 51.0 (36.4, 70.2) 8 stable stable trend -11.0 (-27.2, 8.8)
Camden County 6,10 *** 53.9 (36.8, 76.9) 7 rising rising trend 27.9 (11.9, 46.0)
Hyde County 6,10 *** 83.8 (56.9, 120.4) 6 stable stable trend -12.8 (-30.5, 9.3)
Tyrrell County 6,10 *** 74.7 (46.8, 115.6) 4 stable stable trend -7.5 (-57.3, 100.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/22/2017 6:55 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top